UPDATE: article removed: Twin Towers jumpers that Americans will not talk about

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

rakzum

Banned
Sep 12, 2011
290
0
0
LOL, this is a new one.

One thing the nutjobs can never explain is how could the government gets hundreds of airline workers to go along with this without murdering them afterward?

The flights were published months prior. Tickets were sold. Crews scheduled, maintenance work done, etc... there is an unimaginably large paper trail where the FAA is concerned. Not to mention the number of people who would actually touch an airplane taking off on a scheduled flight.

But somehow this was a secret government operation.

They had the technology to teleguide an airplane.
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,420
1,600
126
LOL, this is a new one.

One thing the nutjobs can never explain is how could the government gets hundreds of airline workers to go along with this without murdering them afterward?

The flights were published months prior. Tickets were sold. Crews scheduled, maintenance work done, etc... there is an unimaginably large paper trail where the FAA is concerned. Not to mention the number of people who would actually touch an airplane taking off on a scheduled flight.

But somehow this was a secret government operation.

but what about the thermite? YOU CAN'T EXPLAIN IT. that's right, straight OWNED son.
 

rakzum

Banned
Sep 12, 2011
290
0
0
LOL, this is a new one.

One thing the nutjobs can never explain is how could the government gets hundreds of airline workers to go along with this without murdering them afterward?

The flights were published months prior. Tickets were sold. Crews scheduled, maintenance work done, etc... there is an unimaginably large paper trail where the FAA is concerned. Not to mention the number of people who would actually touch an airplane taking off on a scheduled flight.

But somehow this was a secret government operation.

Prove it wasn't possible.
 

rakzum

Banned
Sep 12, 2011
290
0
0
I don't know, but I doubt the office fire could have done better than how some demolition teams do.
 

Brovane

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2001
6,372
2,578
136
this may sound like a stupid question, but when i visited the WTC you could go outside onto a roof top observation deck. would it not have been possible to get to this from the upper floors and have a helicopter pick people up?

The doors to reach the roof using the stairs where locked so nobody was able to get onto the roof. Also because of the TV antennas on the roof it would have been difficult to get anybody except by using a sling from a helicopter. Also the biggest reason is that nobody thought the buildings would go down. When people on the upper floors called 911 the operators would tell them to shelter in-place and wait for rescue. The firefighters where trying to go in teams to knock down the fires on the upper floors to clear a router to trapped civilians. It wasn't much a consideration that the buildings would collapse until they actually collapsed. The play book that was being followeed that day was that if the building survived the initial hits that it would remain standing.
 

Wyndru

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2009
7,318
4
76
You can thank the pedo-conspiracy nut rutzam for that, but my guess he was banned at approximately 3:04 PST. Could be wrong, just guessing based on his pedo thread being locked.

They need to run an IP check on that one, it has to be a banned or alt account. He came right into OT all fired up and ready to troll.
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,420
1,600
126
how did WTC7 collapse, son?

super stealth ninjas that planted explosives, escaped, blew up the building at the right time, then removed all the evidence afterwards. YOU CAN'T DISPROVE THIS. I GOT THERMITE CHIPS TO BACK IT UP.

straight owned again. you should just stop.
 

kranky

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
21,019
156
106
It was bad enough that they sent up two essentially unarmed pilots to ram Flight 93 without having a fully armed and airborne squadron of planes ready to intercept anyone who might fly a jetliner into a building, but why didn't they have a team of people with large instantly inflatable airbags there to be deployed to safely catch jumpers in case of such an event? Because it was an inside job!
 

dwell

pics?
Oct 9, 1999
5,185
2
0
My recruiter placed that guy. She was totally broken up about it for years. Must be a terrible feeling.
 
Aug 23, 2000
15,509
1
81
Jumper = suicide = no life insurance

Technically it was classified as an act of terrorism, which lots of policies don't cover. However, since the ME declared them all homicides, life insurance was paid out.


Just the other day someone asked me how long it would take for America as a whole to treat 9/11 like most Americans treat D-Day or the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Judging by the idiotic comments in this thread, I guess 10 years is about it. I wonder how many of you making snide, self proclaimed witty remarks, were even out of grade school then?

I dare any one of you to have your attitude in NYC or Washington D.C. cause you'd rightly get your ass kicked.
 

rakzum

Banned
Sep 12, 2011
290
0
0
super stealth ninjas that planted explosives, escaped, blew up the building at the right time, then removed all the evidence afterwards. YOU CAN'T DISPROVE THIS. I GOT THERMITE CHIPS TO BACK IT UP.

straight owned again. you should just stop.

People resort to personal attacks because they have nothing to say.
 

rakzum

Banned
Sep 12, 2011
290
0
0
Probably because it had a 110 story building fall on it.

I love hearing about the consipracies. They are so fanciful and wild that they can't be disproven.

explaining why all the buildings around the twin towers still had columns or walls standing.
 
Oct 27, 2007
17,009
5
0
Judging by the idiotic comments in this thread, I guess 10 years is about it. I wonder how many of you making snide, self proclaimed witty remarks, were even out of grade school then?

I dare any one of you to have your attitude in NYC or Washington D.C. cause you'd rightly get your ass kicked.
I haven't seen anyone proclaim themselves to be witty. Please show me where this has happened.

Stop being such a pussy. It has been 10 years.
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
They had the technology to teleguide an airplane.

And how exactly did this technology make its way onto the airplane?

Prove it wasn't possible.

If this were the case, Bush would have had the operatives use a fly-by-wire Boeing 777 or Airbus. Not a Boeing 767 where the plane is a fly-by-cable system.

lol, perhaps the chemtrails made people hallucinate and it was really a missile that hit the WTC.
 
Last edited:

rakzum

Banned
Sep 12, 2011
290
0
0
And how exactly did this technology make its way onto the airplane?



If this were the case, Bush would have had the operatives use a fly-by-wire Boeing 777 or Airbus. Not a Boeing 767 where the plane is a fly-by-cable system.

lol, perhaps the chemtrails made people hallucinate and it was really a missile that hit the WTC.

You can't prove they didn't replace the system and you can't prove they could have never had the opportunity to replace it. /thread