Originally posted by: Blooz1
I remember a while back that a few people made the observation that Bartons OC'd better after a few days of running as opposed to "right out of the box". Have any of you people found that to be true?
I've been running SETI on my 1700 DUT, and I'd like to get a 2500 to be able to run at lower voltage than my present 1.8V. I'm also curious as to whether the extra cache would have any effect with the 3.03 SETI client...
Yupper! My Seti@home dropped about 1/4 off of the time required to process a result when I went to a Barton chip.