unions continue to show their scumbaggery

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

bctbct

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2005
4,868
1
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: bctbct
If you live in CA you should worry that that would happen.

Without the Unions lobbying on the behalf of all workers, you could see some drastic changes evolve in worker protections at the state level.

Of course you dont belong to a Union so those changes would never effect you.
Yea... the second the unions go away we are going to eliminate all work force protection laws... to hell with the voters or the people... :roll:


BTW the power of the unions have been on the decline for decades and yet we continue to get more laws aimed at protecting workers... why is that??


What specific new laws protecting workers are you talking about?

In recent years things that come to mind where there is not enough worker protection

whistle blowers have been terminated
If you work for Bud and drink Coors you can be fired
If you smoke outside the work place you can be fired

Business is not going to lobby to enact laws that limit their authority over workers, where do you think these laws come from? 10 random employees dont ban together to protect injured workers benefits etc.

Organized Labor Unions lead the way in addressing workers concerns.

 
Jul 10, 2007
12,041
3
0
Originally posted by: redgtxdi
I despise today's unions and cannot wait til the day they are gone!

Wait til Cali goes broke and unions are forced to suck it, laying the groundwork for all new terms for unions around the country.

:D

exactly.
look no further than the big 3 in detroit for an example.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: dainthomas
Originally posted by: n yusef
Originally posted by: AyashiKaibutsu
Originally posted by: JeepinEd
Now, they're just out to squeeze every last penny from whomever they can.

Damn straight they are just like employers are trying to squeeze every penny out of their workers. I won't say I particularly like Unions and that they're never overpaid, but it's a result free market (employees have nowhere near the power of employers and thus need to band together to have equal bargaining power) and it works both ways. To go against unions is to support communism. You're not a Communist/Marxist/Socialist are you?

Umm, labor unions are strongly connected with socialism. That doesn't mean that there's anything wrong with either.

Why do socialist governments always outlaw unions?

Only room for one group of thugs?
 

Hacp

Lifer
Jun 8, 2005
13,923
2
81
Originally posted by: SigArms08
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: SigArms08
You mention bill collectors from the phone company - if a person or company is unsatisfied with the service and/or cost provided by said phone company, they can easily switch to another company that can better meet their needs. Same is true of credit cards, unless you're too ignorant and have charged up some massive debt that is unmanageable. Using the IRS as a comparison is incredibly poor as paying taxes is a legal requirement of each citizen. Are you suggesting that it should be a legal requirement to utilize unionized labor?

You really missed what the analogy was about. The discussion was about the statement that corporations not 'liking' to deal with unions, and my pointing out how silly it was.

I don't care what phone company or credit card company you pick, you aren't expected to 'like' dealing with their bill collectors. That was the point.

That the corporations 'liking' to deal with the unions isn't the issue, of *course* they don't 'like' to deal with people that are going to negotiate for higher wages. So what?

JeepinEd addressed your concern over wages. What say you to the professions that aren't unionized? Are those people, including myself, all working for slave wages?

No, first, unions have an effect on non-union industries; non-union companies are still competing for workers with union shops. Second, unions aren't the whole story.

There are a variety of things that cause wages to increase, including a variety of government policies that support it. Unions are just one part.

I don't know, Craig.....does everybody deserve a blanket raise when its time for review? Those who have worked harder, been more responsible and productive in their roles should earn a higher wage than the individual who is a chronic dirtbag. On many occasions, its incredibly difficult, if not impossible, for an employer to get rid of the few undesirables due to the blanket protection that unions typically offer (I'm refering to the UAW here as I personally have years of experience working as a salaried person within that absurd environment). As a manager or company, would you like dealing with unions when the expectation is that your business unit is profitable in a competitive marketplace?
I have a few friends who own and manage their own businesses. I'll run your analogy by them to gain an understanding of their perspective, too.

"Non-union companies are still competing for workers with union shops."
In this global economy? I'm not gung-ho on free trade like NAFTA, mind you. Would be nice if we had fair trade, though.

"There are a variety of things that cause wages to increase, including a variety of government policies that support it. Unions are just one part"
Increasing wages beyond that of inflation without sufficient cause and/or increased productivity is not a great thing for the economy.

You're already supposed to work your hardest for your salary. That's whats expected of you. If you don't work your hardest, you should be in line for a paycut. No one owes you anything for doing your job.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Hacp
[
You're already supposed to work your hardest for your salary. That's whats expected of you. If you don't work your hardest, you should be in line for a paycut. No one owes you anything for doing your job.
They owe me what we agreed they'd compensate me for my effort.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: bctbct
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: bctbct
If you live in CA you should worry that that would happen.

Without the Unions lobbying on the behalf of all workers, you could see some drastic changes evolve in worker protections at the state level.

Of course you dont belong to a Union so those changes would never effect you.
Yea... the second the unions go away we are going to eliminate all work force protection laws... to hell with the voters or the people... :roll:


BTW the power of the unions have been on the decline for decades and yet we continue to get more laws aimed at protecting workers... why is that??


What specific new laws protecting workers are you talking about?

In recent years things that come to mind where there is not enough worker protection

whistle blowers have been terminated
If you work for Bud and drink Coors you can be fired
If you smoke outside the work place you can be fired

Business is not going to lobby to enact laws that limit their authority over workers, where do you think these laws come from? 10 random employees dont ban together to protect injured workers benefits etc.

Organized Labor Unions lead the way in addressing workers concerns.

This is where PJ usually becomes scarce. He said it because it was convenient at the time. Usually, he has little to back it up. I asked the same question of him.
 

nobodyknows

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2008
5,474
0
0
Originally posted by: BlahBlahYouToo
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
So what do you guys propose, that we outlaw workers from organizing ?

how about, competing on price, quality of work, etc. instead of unethical strongarm practices as mentioned in the article?

You mean to say that if they're honest, trustworthy, and true they will get their just reward??


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA, you're quite the comedian.
 
Jul 10, 2007
12,041
3
0
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Originally posted by: BlahBlahYouToo
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
So what do you guys propose, that we outlaw workers from organizing ?

how about, competing on price, quality of work, etc. instead of unethical strongarm practices as mentioned in the article?

You mean to say that if they're honest, trustworthy, and true they will get their just reward??


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA, you're quite the comedian.

:roll:
 

Hacp

Lifer
Jun 8, 2005
13,923
2
81
Originally posted by: nobodyknows
Originally posted by: BlahBlahYouToo
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
So what do you guys propose, that we outlaw workers from organizing ?

how about, competing on price, quality of work, etc. instead of unethical strongarm practices as mentioned in the article?

You mean to say that if they're honest, trustworthy, and true they will get their just reward??


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA, you're quite the comedian.

You could be honest trustworthy and true and still be extremely lazy and fat and dumb. The traits are not mutually exclusive.
 

ChunkiMunki

Senior member
Dec 21, 2001
449
0
0
nice to see the fat lazy and dumb union stereotype is alive and well. Millionaire CEO's. presidents, vice-presidents and assorted lazy and dumb management can rape a company and take millions in bonuses, but god forbid a union workforce get a .25 cent an hour raise.