Well, here's my PATHETIC score.
Still not sure whats wrong but pretty certain I should score highers than this. With two 780s Oh well
![]()
1320/1851
![]()
Bastardlips! You just knocked me from 3rd place D: . Nice score btw :thumbsup:
If that's all stock then its not entirely pathetic as you say. Given your score can massively be improved upon should you investigate further your current score is more an opportunity than a failure..
This is the Unigine Valley 1.0 Benchmark Thread...
Speaking of, I realized I had FXAA enabled globally in my driver control panel, so I reset my driver to default values and got a couple more fps:
3450 with clocks @ 1280/6500
![]()
i5-2500k @ 4.2
7950 @ 1040/1550
![]()
![]()
Yo face2face
Come on 4.2GHz and 1040/1550??? Try atleast! :twisted
So, inspired by Ranger, I set my CPU voltage up a bit and went to 4.6.
I could only get the GPU to 1075/1550.
Upping the GPU beyond 1075 and the machine would freeze.
I did not add more volts to the GPU.
I netted an additional 1 fps ( 42.7 ) with those mods - didn't seem like it was worth the extra power.
You are correct. However, Valley actually will scale noticeably with cpu clock speeds unlike Heaven which doesn't really seem to care if you're running 3.8GHz or 5GHz....same score.I would say Valley responds more to GPU increases than CPU.
Perhaps he's like me and only benches at stable clock speeds. I find little point in benchmarking at speeds that are entirely unusable.