Originally posted by: BoomerD
I've only done a couple of freshwater planted aquariums. They can be pretty labor intensive, depending on the exact set up.
You are VERY limited as to how many/what kind/how large of fish you can have. (high nutrient load creates nuisance algaes and problems.)
You'll probably need to use water treated by reverse osmosis and probably also deionization to remove the methyl-ethyl bad stuff in the tap water...then, add certain trace elements and minerals back into the water for the plants.
Be ready for your electric bills go go through the roof. MOST planted tanks use metal halide lighting, 250 watts, 2 x 250 watts, and even 400 watt set ups aren't uncommon. (the types of plants you want will determine the amount of lighting necessary.
Some people manage to keep less-light demanding plants with compact fluorescent lighting in the proper spectrum. I never liked the power compacts, and instead, I used VHO fluorescents over my planted tanks. (4 x 110 watts)
These tanks can be as demanding as salt-water reef tanks...but like reef tanks, they're gorgeous.
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Some people manage to keep less-light demanding plants with compact fluorescent lighting in the proper spectrum. I never liked the power compacts, and instead, I used VHO fluorescents over my planted tanks. (4 x 110 watts)
Its one of those Chinese Algae Eaters, isn't it?Originally posted by: djheater
Alright, I wasn't going to post but I'll go ahead and open myself up to the crazy criticism aquariasts have for goldfish owners.
I've got a 20 gallon tank with 2 goldfish and an algae eater that has been humming along for over a year with now problems. Everyone is happy and healthy though the algae eater is a territorial ass and likes to harass the goldies.
Will post pics.
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
WTF is so special about the 250W MH's on that site? 1100 for a 250W metal halide with specialized reflector is fucking insane...
Originally posted by: Rubycon
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Some people manage to keep less-light demanding plants with compact fluorescent lighting in the proper spectrum. I never liked the power compacts, and instead, I used VHO fluorescents over my planted tanks. (4 x 110 watts)
Ice cap ballast?
Originally posted by: Rubycon
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
WTF is so special about the 250W MH's on that site? 1100 for a 250W metal halide with specialized reflector is fucking insane...
Yes they are much cheaper in the back of High Times mag but the bulbs aren't the best. 4300K Ventures are just south of a C note. A 400W magnetic Advance or Magnetek MH ballast is about $75, wire and mogul socket another few bucks. You can use a metal flower pot for a reflector and bam you have a nice HID system for a fraction of that price!
Originally posted by: Rubycon
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
WTF is so special about the 250W MH's on that site? 1100 for a 250W metal halide with specialized reflector is fucking insane...
Yes they are much cheaper in the back of High Times mag but the bulbs aren't the best. 4300K Ventures are just south of a C note. A 400W magnetic Advance or Magnetek MH ballast is about $75, wire and mogul socket another few bucks. You can use a metal flower pot for a reflector and bam you have a nice HID system for a fraction of that price!
Originally posted by: BoomerD
I did a lot of my lighting supply business with these folks:
http://www.hellolights.com/
http://www.marinedepot.com/PFO_Lighting-PF-vd.html
I preferred the PFO ballasts, whether electronic or tar ballast.
(even though usually, the internal components are the same as most other manufacturers)
They did a quality job in the build, very "user friendly" in design.
There are some "not so expensive" alternatives on the web, especially ebay, but you really gotta watch what you buy. With lighting, especially metal halides, you get what you pay for.
(there's one cheapo Chinese-made brand that's notorious for starting fires) :shocked:
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
do these put out more lumens, or a better spectrum? I know there are differences in build quality, and construction, but i just found a 2x price difference to be insane... though i wonder how CMH bulbs would work on these gardens...
Originally posted by: her209
Its one of those Chinese Algae Eaters, isn't it?Originally posted by: djheater
Alright, I wasn't going to post but I'll go ahead and open myself up to the crazy criticism aquariasts have for goldfish owners.
I've got a 20 gallon tank with 2 goldfish and an algae eater that has been humming along for over a year with now problems. Everyone is happy and healthy though the algae eater is a territorial ass and likes to harass the goldies.
Will post pics.
Originally posted by: Rubycon
A friend of mine who kept sharks in medium to larger tanks (15K gallon circular tanks) used high pressure Xenon lighting that's super brilliant white light that was crazy powerful. He built his own ballasts (he called them drivers) using RF amplifiers The larger lamps were 30kW. He had scaled designs using a klystron that could drive over 200kW but never needed that much light. :shocked:
He also experimented with 2.4GHz microwave rotary globe lamps but was not satisfied with their (lack of) blue output which always had to be supplemented with mercury arc and was peaky.
Originally posted by: Rubycon
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
do these put out more lumens, or a better spectrum? I know there are differences in build quality, and construction, but i just found a 2x price difference to be insane... though i wonder how CMH bulbs would work on these gardens...
There's so many different types of bulbs these days. The cheaper eye (Iwasaki) ones tend to be quite green. Reef bulbs at 20K are quite blue and lack efficacy compared to the 5500K bulbs which look quite similar to afternoon daylight. Do remember that a reef in real life (or a BIG tank hehe!) at 20 meters is going to quite filtered and the light will have a bluer cast. Twice the number of 20K bulbs would be needed or stepping up to 400W bulbs would probably be better.
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Here's some VERY GOOD lighting links:
http://www.cnidarianreef.com/lamps.cfm
In the above link, you'll find a group of photos taken of the same tank with different lighting. (different ballasts and different bulb combinations)
here's a site put together that allows you to compare them side by side:
http://chrismorris.ca/250wcolour/
And, from Dr. Sanjay Joshi:
http://www.manhattanreefs.com/lighting
Originally posted by: Rubycon
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Here's some VERY GOOD lighting links:
http://www.cnidarianreef.com/lamps.cfm
In the above link, you'll find a group of photos taken of the same tank with different lighting. (different ballasts and different bulb combinations)
here's a site put together that allows you to compare them side by side:
http://chrismorris.ca/250wcolour/
And, from Dr. Sanjay Joshi:
http://www.manhattanreefs.com/lighting
Don't forget the spectral shift to warmer as the lamps age. Also if proper shutdown and positioning is not observed the lamp output is changed - sometimes permanently.
LED definitely has a bright future. Heat is not completely absent either! Higher powered arrays will throw heat into a body of water. Of course an arc tube running at 1700C is quite the producer of heat!![]()
