Underestimate Marco Rubio at your own peril

[Indus]

I think Trump might win. I'm not the only liberal who will vote for him.

I'm a liberal too but let me know on your thinking for coming to that conclusion.

For me even though I want Sanders's change to education and minimum wage, I figure no change is better than the ass backwards change Trump or Cruz is offering.

Kasich or Ryan are my wildcards though.. if they get in vs Hillary.. I might vote for them since I find them more honest than her.

 

[werepossum]

while (Rubio==Robot) //wtf speech
{
    While we were on the right side, we will not be on the winning side. 
    While today my campaign is suspended.
    While the politics of resentment against other people won't just leave  us as a  fractured party, they're going to leave us as a fractured nation.
    While we try to figure out why I keep saying while, while my programmers keep updating my code...
} //end while loop

He's a while and crazy guy!

lmao +1

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Is this the end of Getty? Or will he/she hitch his/her crazy cart onto the cruz-mobile?

He's lookin' at you big boy!

 

[Moonbeam]

Is this the end of Getty? Or will he/she hitch his/her crazy cart onto the cruz-mobile?

He's lookin' at you big boy!

I don't know how to make that face. All I see is a nut case.

 

[wirelessenabled]

If you've been bested by Ryan, a feather floating in the breeze, you're a hot air balloon with no balloon, an unrestrained puff of air expanding into nothingness.

Another +1 :thumbsup:

I just cannot see what anybody sees in Rubio. He is such an obvious pandering lightweight to me. Good speaker? How? He has these canned snippets that he repeats in a weird sequence, usually not pertaining to the topic at hand, or even the general flow of his speech.

 

[Brian Stirling]

I don't know how to make that face. All I see is a nut case.

A face like that reminds me of Jeffery Dahmer.


Brian

 

[SP33Demon]

I'm a liberal too but let me know on your thinking for coming to that conclusion.

For me even though I want Sanders's change to education and minimum wage, I figure no change is better than the ass backwards change Trump or Cruz is offering.

Kasich or Ryan are my wildcards though.. if they get in vs Hillary.. I might vote for them since I find them more honest than her.

What if Kasich or Ryan are Veep?

 

[Indus]

What if Kasich or Ryan are Veep?

Fuck no. I'm not voting for a VP. What the fuck do they do besides fluff the main candidate like Sarah Palin?

 

[wirelessenabled]

I'm a liberal too but let me know on your thinking for coming to that conclusion.

For me even though I want Sanders's change to education and minimum wage, I figure no change is better than the ass backwards change Trump or Cruz is offering.

Kasich or Ryan are my wildcards though.. if they get in vs Hillary.. I might vote for them since I find them more honest than her.

Kasich maybe but Ryan? For a "wonk" he is remarkably uninformed about the budget and the how and why of the money being spent.

And now he is being an idiot for continuing the so-called Hastert Rule, ie majority of the majority voting in the House. For someone who professes to be a Constitution kind of guy Ryan should show us where the Constitution says anything about the Hastert Rule.

I think the Founders set up our Government the way they did in large part because they wanted to get away from the Parliamentary system, ie majority of the majority, ie Hastert Rule.

Following the Hastert Rule has given us the absurd situation where a small minority of way out of the mainstream conservative House members dictate policy to the mainstream. That situation is stupid and Paul Ryan is carrying that forward.

Maybe Janesville will get smart this year and throw Ryan out of office.:thumbsup:

 

[Brian Stirling]

Kasich maybe but Ryan? For a "wonk" he is remarkably uninformed about the budget and the how and why of the money being spent.

And now he is being an idiot for continuing the so-called Hastert Rule, ie majority of the majority voting in the House. For someone who professes to be a Constitution kind of guy Ryan should show us where the Constitution says anything about the Hastert Rule.

I think the Founders set up our Government the way they did in large part because they wanted to get away from the Parliamentary system, ie majority of the majority, ie Hastert Rule.

Following the Hastert Rule has given us the absurd situation where a small minority of way out of the mainstream conservative House members dictate policy to the mainstream. That situation is stupid and Paul Ryan is carrying that forward.

Maybe Janesville will get smart this year and throw Ryan out of office.:thumbsup:

Say, whatever happened to Hastert?


Brian

 

[blankslate]

A face like that reminds me of Jeffery Dahmer.

Not Jeffrey Dahmer...

 

[werepossum]

Say, whatever happened to Hastert?


Brian

Ran out of money to pay his blackmailers, pled guilty to bank structuring to conceal paying his blackmailers, had a major stroke, had a VERY major blood infection, and is now trying to argue that he's too sick to go to prison. (Which, merely coincidentally, is practically devoid of hot children.)

 

[Brian Stirling]

Ran out of money to pay his blackmailers, pled guilty to bank structuring to conceal paying his blackmailers, had a major stroke, had a VERY major blood infection, and is now trying to argue that he's too sick to go to prison. (Which, merely coincidentally, is practically devoid of hot children.)

OK, then what ever happened to the Hastert Rule?


Brian

 

[Fern]

OK, then what ever happened to the Hastert Rule?


Brian

The Hastert rule remains in effect.

Fern