• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Underclocking?

TwoFlower

Junior Member
I whant to quite down a computer to a minimum. Is there possible to underclock a CPU so that you dont need to have a fan on it? Which CPU should I go for then (I whas hoping for a value system)?
 
I'd be interested too - I want to build a cheapish box with tv out for watching divx/dvds, so it doesn't need to be too fast. My K6/533 almost can handle it, but some higher quality divxs choke it. I'm thinking either C3 or a Celeron if I can get the Celeron to run cool enough to use just a heat sink with no fan. I figure the C3 & the Celerons are about the same price but Celeron would probably be more useful down the road. Anyone running one with just passive cooling?
Thanks,
Bobby
 
If you undervolt a celeron Tualatin, have a large, efficient heatsink, and decent case airflow, it should be quite possible.

The C3's do it no problem. Tualatin celeron's need a bit more attention.

This thread contains a little more info from someone who has actually done it.

If you need a bit of power, I agree the Tualatin would be the best bet. You can probably run a 1.2 Gig at 1.2V if you get really lucky. Even at 1.3 it shouldn't be too bad.
 
What is easier to do instead of aiming for a fanless CPU heatsink would be to aim for a quieter fan. I think this would be much easier to do. For instance, get a Tualatin Celeron (any speed, though my guess is that the slower ones like the 1.0A run cooler), undervolt it slightly and run the retail box HSF using the 7 volt trick. This should run really quiet, yet be fairly powerful.
 
Back
Top