Unarmed black 17 year old shot by Neighborhood watch captain in gated community...

Page 1540 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Words. Words are wind.

No one has answered why we arrest, detain, then try suspected law breakers if everyone is automatically innocent?

The state has to prove guilt.
The defendant has to show that the state can not prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

At times the state can prove; other times they can not.

the judge also determines if the state might have a chance or will it be a waste of time based on information the state has presented to the court.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
If everyone is automatically innocent of any crime they're suspected of committing, why do we arrest and detain anyone, and why do we have trials? I guess like Emperus said, the Aurora shooter is innocent, then. He should be released.

Given that you do not understand the concept of PROOF how can one explain it to you.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
doesnt seem like the new judge is a walk in the park, was reading she is pretty harsh.

The 5 second biography indicated such.

I expect that she will bend over backward to ensure fairness; no judge likes to be overruled and she has Lester as an example of not exposing bias.
 

OCNewbie

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2000
7,596
24
81
Also, if the court cannot prove you are guilty, you are found "not guilty", which isn't the same as "innocent". The reason they call it "not guilty" and not "innocent" is because it reflects the goal of the court, and that is to prove guilt. When it's "not guilty" that shows that the court failed to prove the charged guilt (beyond a reasonable doubt). That doesn't mean someone is innocent of the crime they are accused of, it just means there wasn't sufficient evidence to convict the alleged criminal for the alleged crime.
 
Last edited:

tashatexas

Golden Member
Jun 21, 2012
1,039
0
0
I'm still waiting for even a single shred of evidence Zimmerman committed a crime.

So far there is none.

You aren't looking for anything, stop lying.

If a grown ass 50 pound heavier and armed man killing an unarmed CHILD who screamed for his life per two independent experts isn't ekough for you then fact finding is the least of your interest in this case.
 

tashatexas

Golden Member
Jun 21, 2012
1,039
0
0
Zimmerman supporters live with their heads in a hole. The bottom line is if the jury believes Trayvon screamed for his life Zimmerman is fucked.
 

tashatexas

Golden Member
Jun 21, 2012
1,039
0
0
Who was screaming is so much at the center of this case that Zimmerman supporters REFUSE to admit it could have been Trayvon though two experts have said it absolutely was him. Zimmerthug was UNABLE to reproduce the screams because it wasn't him. He did not hear the 911 screams until after he gave his voice sample after which he said, "that's not me screaming." Well no shit Sherlock!
 
Sep 7, 2009
12,960
3
0
You aren't looking for anything, stop lying.

If a grown ass 50 pound heavier and armed man killing an unarmed CHILD who screamed for his life per two independent experts isn't ekough for you then fact finding is the least of your interest in this case.


Child... ROFL... No kidding, you aren't with a gaggle of friends boasting about shit they don't know. Nobody here can logically and honestly consider trayvon a "child". In my state he would be charged as an adult for his vicious attack on zimmerman.

If you're old enough to be breaking into houses, trafficking jewelry between cities, brutally attacking innocent people... You a grown man. You're making big boy choices, and are treated as such.
 

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
Too bad the FBI said the poor quality and length (without talk over) of the screams on the 911 call prevents analysis of the voice sample. Owens had a 48% match with this poor quality voice sample.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
You aren't looking for anything, stop lying.

If a grown ass 50 pound heavier and armed man killing an unarmed CHILD who screamed for his life per two independent experts isn't ekough for you then fact finding is the least of your interest in this case.

Yet those experts had a stake in the process.

FBI stated that results are inconclusive.
Martins dad stated it was not his son when first presented with the tapes.
(Politics forces a rescinding of his statement; just like who was screaming, etc.)
 

OCNewbie

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2000
7,596
24
81
He did not hear the 911 screams until after he gave his voice sample after which he said, "that's not me screaming." Well no shit Sherlock!

GZ never said what you put in quotes. GZ's words were: "That doesn't even sound like me." In other words, he knew the screams were his own, but he was shocked at what he heard; probably because he had never before screamed like that in his life, because he had never felt that amount of fear before.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
GZ never said what you put in quotes. GZ's words were: "That doesn't even sound like me." In other words, he knew the screams were his own, but he was shocked at what he heard; probably because he had never before screamed like that in his life, because he had never felt that amount of fear before.

Bingo. A man who is truly in fear for their life will squeel, not yell, just like you hear in the 911 tape. The call further proves self defense as it is yet more evidence he truly feared for his life.

This adds to the mounds of evidence showing and in fact proving, self defense with nothing saying it wasn't. Way beyond a preponderance of evidence showing self defense. JUSTICE FOR ZIMMERMAN! Justice is tossing it out at the immunity hearing, he's immune from criminal and civil liability.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
She is apparently pretty conservative. She is probably more likely to err on the side of caution and let a jury decide his fate.

Umm, she can't "err", she MUST follow the law. The law says if there is 51% chance, shown by evidence, that it was self defense she MUST dismiss it as zimmerman is immune from prosecution. She can't just go "oh well, there's overwhelming evidence of self defense and nothing showing a crime but I want to send it to a jury".
 

JKing106

Platinum Member
Mar 19, 2009
2,193
0
0
Umm, she can't "err", she MUST follow the law. The law says if there is 51% chance, shown by evidence, that it was self defense she MUST dismiss it as zimmerman is immune from prosecution. She can't just go "oh well, there's overwhelming evidence of self defense and nothing showing a crime but I want to send it to a jury".

Maybe President Perry will pardon Zimmerman after he's sentenced.
 

Geosurface

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2012
5,773
4
0
Who was screaming is so much at the center of this case

Agreed. I've always been the foremost voice in this thread stressing the importance of who was screaming. It is the one thing which has the most power to indicate what was happening, the dynamic of what was going on prior to the shot.

Zimmerman supporters REFUSE to admit it could have been Trayvon

Correct. There is almost no possible way, within the known evidence and logic/common sense, that it was Trayvon screaming. It just simply wasn't.

- GZ had the injuries
- GZ said it was him screaming immediately
- A witness said he saw GZ screaming
- That same witness expressed what should go without saying, the logic of why he would deduce it was GZ (the person on bottom being beaten) screaming.
- The voice is not that of an African American male. Black males have a deeper voice, with a distinctive sound to it. This is why black voice actors are hired to voice black characters. There are exceptions, some whites can do a convincing black voice, some blacks speak with a more stereotypically white voice, however, Trayvon did in fact have a stereotypically black voice, just as his father does.
- It would not make any sense for the attacker to scream, especially to scream like that.
- It actually, and simply IS George Zimmerman's voice. Just listen to the god damned recording. It's his voice.

two experts have said it absolutely was him.

Incorrect. Two voice analysis guys contracted by the Orlando Sentinel said they didn't think it was Zimmerman, when comparing a scream to a calm speaking voice, with their heads completely filled with the mythos and urban legends which surrounded this case at the time. They had inadequate samples and disparate samples and a valid comparison could not be made, according to their own science's governing principles. They did it anyway because it was a good opportunity for publicity. They gave the answer that was common wisdom at that point, playing it safe and covering their ass by saying they couldn't be sure. They didn't even have a sample of Trayvon's voice.

They promised another analysis once they had Trayvon's voice, and the family of Trayvon said they'd provide it. We've not heard a peep about that in months. Use your brain and think why that might be.

Zimmerthug was UNABLE to reproduce the screams because it wasn't him.

Zimmerman was not asked by the investigators to scream, he was asked to repeat the word "help" over and over and over and over and over again in a monotone, low volume voice. This was an extremely flawed way for the investigators to do their "reenactment" and they should've known better. Zimmerman should've pointed this out, and said "wait, that's not what is on the recording... why don't I scream the same way?" but as we know he's not that bright.

Of course, it's difficult to recreate that kind of raw terror and fear for your life, and GZ certainly isn't some sort of Julliard trained actor or something.

He did not hear the 911 screams until after he gave his voice sample after which he said, "that's not me screaming." Well no shit Sherlock!

As OCNewbie indicated, GZ said "that doesn't even sound like me" which is actually just about the most candid, normal, expected possible thing someone in that situation would say. It says a lot about his honesty and candor to me, and to anyone not wearing racial vengeance blinders, which I'm pretty sure you've actually put about 5 pairs of on.

He was expressing disbelief that he could sound that way. He wasn't saying it wasn't him screaming.
 
Last edited:

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Umm, she can't "err", she MUST follow the law. The law says if there is 51% chance, shown by evidence, that it was self defense she MUST dismiss it as zimmerman is immune from prosecution. She can't just go "oh well, there's overwhelming evidence of self defense and nothing showing a crime but I want to send it to a jury".

only in Stand your ground hearing. wich could get everything dropped (wont surprise me actually). otherwise it will get to a jury there is enough for that. very rarely does a judge dismiss it after the state (though it does happen) i just don't see it happening here.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
only in Stand your ground hearing. wich could get everything dropped (wont surprise me actually). otherwise it will get to a jury there is enough for that. very rarely does a judge dismiss it after the state (though it does happen) i just don't see it happening here.

The judge is bound by law to declare zimmerman immune from prosecution if there is a preponderance of evidence he acted in self defense. There is WAY beyond the 51% preponderance of evidence, she MUST, by law, declare him immune from prosecution. That is the only outcome if we are to have justice for zimmerman.

There's a freaking witness to everything needed for it to be self defense.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
The judge is bound by law to declare zimmerman immune from prosecution if there is a preponderance of evidence he acted in self defense. There is WAY beyond the 51% preponderance of evidence, she MUST, by law, declare him immune from prosecution. That is the only outcome if we are to have justice for zimmerman.

There's a freaking witness to everything needed for it to be self defense.


I suspect you are right on that. Though with how this case is going who knows. i expect it to get thrown out with the stand your ground hearing. BUT if it goes to trial it will go to the jury.

At least its not like the Drew Peterson case with the state doing a bunch of BS lol
 

Geosurface

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2012
5,773
4
0
The judge is bound by law to declare zimmerman immune from prosecution if there is a preponderance of evidence he acted in self defense. There is WAY beyond the 51% preponderance of evidence, she MUST, by law, declare him immune from prosecution. That is the only outcome if we are to have justice for zimmerman.

There's a freaking witness to everything needed for it to be self defense.

To shield yourself from disappointment I would strongly advise you to stop thinking of this in terms of what the law, the truth, or morality would dictate.

We are off the map in terms of that, and have been for a while now. Anything goes, and political correctness, white guilt, lynch mob vengeful bloodlust... these are the forces that guide this process now.

Or else he wouldn't have even been charged or arrested, after all.

There MAY be enough sunlight on this thing now, and enough people in the system who still fear to violate their oaths in such dramatic, blatant ways... for the correct outcome to still result.

However even if, in the end, Zimmerman has his life restored to him, expect it to be done in such a way as to cover asses and attempt to still appease those who won't be satisfied with anything but his head on a stick. They will try nonetheless to appease them in some way though.

Prepare for disappointment.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
I'm preparing more for the riots when he's declared immune, got the wife down to where she can reload a 30 round mag in under a minute. That will go along with the 50 ones that are full and ready for the hoarde.
 

classy

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
15,219
1
81
I'm preparing more for the riots when he's declared immune, got the wife down to where she can reload a 30 round mag in under a minute. That will go along with the 50 ones that are full and ready for the hoarde.

LOL, boy are so silly. Your posts are truly a joy to read, they really are. Hunkerdown Spidey, they are coming for you :)
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
LOL, boy are so silly. Your posts are truly a joy to read, they really are. Hunkerdown Spidey, they are coming for you :)

Do you not think there will be massive riots when he's declared immune from prosecution and corey gives that speech where she says by law nothing more can be done? Right now a large majority of the black population think zimmerman chased him down and shot him in the back from 20 feet for walking while black, and no amount of evidence or fact is going to change that perception/belief.