Everytime I watch something about GZ, I notice more contradicitons.
That's because you're specifically looking for them.
Everytime I watch something about GZ, I notice more contradicitons.
"IMO", in your OPINION, is not "a known fact" like you put it earlier. Therefore, because it's not a known fact, it won't hold the weight in a civil trial like you implied it would/will. Besides, they never said "go back to your vehicle, sir." They basically said "it's not necessary for you to continue following him", and he gave them an affirmative/acknowledging reply.
Everytime I watch something about GZ, I notice more contradicitons.
1.) Frank Taiffe. Frank Taiffe obviously spoke to GZ after the incident, that's why he was so detailed when talking to reported. When he was going through the crime scene with a reporter. He states GZ parked with his headlights away from the cut through. He makes a point of describing the direction. But in his walkthrough and in his statements, GZ says he parked with his headlights facing the cut through. Which way was he parked? Taiffe's inital version would make sense as that is the direction of traffic. If GZ parked the other way he was parking on the wrong side of the street.
2.) After thinking about that, it led me to a 2nd thought. GZ claims he didn't follow TM. But how and why did he drive from the club house to the cut through? In his reeneactment, he claims the dispatcher asked him if "to get to somewhere where he can see him". The dispatcher never said that. So the question becomes, if he wasn't following TM, why did he end up at the T?
Maybe teenage boys should learn not to attack another person as that person maybe armed.
Maybe old people should stop shooting Teens?
I think an important witness is the lady who saw a chase. She has never said she didn't know if she saw two people or not, she has always said it was two people, she just didn't know who was chasing whom. If the jury believes what she saw was associated with this crime then Zimmerman is toast. Obviously we know for 100% sure it was Zimmerman chasing Martin. Zimmerman has already locked himself down to a story that does not include being chased.
Are you insane? JKwhatever (forget the other one, he/she is quite obviously just an idiot with an agenda) is the best thing to hit this forum since The Mooner, Fail234, SuperSmartPoliticalGuy, and PeopleNeedTrainingOnHowToPickGarbageUpOffTheGround. Heck, I think he's probably the greatest thing to hit this forum yet. It's so rare we get someone so lacking in intelligence they don't hide their White Guilter and/or Bleeding Heart behind some smarmy liberal logic to not just outright be (correctly) labeled a White Guilter and/or Bleeding Heart.
Here we have someone who clearly is a White Guilter - and I think we can all agree, a textbook example of one - and we get to see the inner workings of the White Guilter mind, unencumbered by...well, anything.
Sh1t man, really, you're blocking this guy? If you were smart you'd be copying all his posts and making a book called, 'White People: Avoid Being Overly PC With Your Child, This is the Result'. It would sell like hotcakes...
Chuck
Also Druid - John's "MMA" statement - Prosecution can site the lack of blood and bruising on TM's hands - the lack of anything on GZ's face other than one punch to the nose, and the complete lack of any defensive wounds on GZ's hands and arms.
Again, the two of them wrestling for control of the gun makes far more sense than a prolonged beating.
Also Druid - John's "MMA" statement - Prosecution can site the lack of blood and bruising on TM's hands - the lack of anything on GZ's face other than one punch to the nose, and the complete lack of any defensive wounds on GZ's hands and arms.
Again, the two of them wrestling for control of the gun makes far more sense than a prolonged beating.
Geo - I'm not sure why you think who was yelling is so important - I think only Tasha at this point is claiming it wasn't GZ - and if you want to go back and forth with that, be my guest.
As to your comment about GZ being "unguarded.." - it points towards only his ignorance - nothing else.
this "fight" was a struggle over a gun and I don't blame TM one bit for mounting and trying to disarm the lying asshole who had a history of being a thug like person.
Maybe teenage boys should learn not to attack another person as that person maybe armed.
If GZ goes to prison he better become somone's bitch real quick.
and the state needs to convince 100% of the jurors as well
Maybe adults shouldn't go running after strangers at night for no reason while carrying a deadly weapon, he put a 17 yr old in that situation and anyone's shocked he reacted badly? were you mature enough at 17 to know what to do if a stranger stalks and pursues you? I HIGHLY DOUBT IT...
Someone pulls a gun on you so you attack them? Highly unlikely.
Yeah, just let them break your nose and then look the other way... that is if your still alive after they finish beating on you.Maybe old people should stop shooting Teens?
I was certainly mature enough at that age to have went straight home and not take the chance of a confrontation with a stranger following me.
I seriously doubt TM knew GZ had a gun until seconds before he was shot. No one in their right mind would try to attack someone that had a gun on them.
I was certainly mature enough at that age to have went straight home and not take the chance of a confrontation with a stranger following me.
I agree, but several posters seem to think that GZ initiated the confrontation by pulling a gun, but who in their right mind would attack someone who had a gun pointed at them?
Teen boys do crazy things to impress a girl.
One - turn off common sense
Teen boys do crazy things to impress a girl.
One - turn off common sense
True statement, but attack someone with a gun pointing at them? Not me. TM may have well confronted GZ to impress the girl, but not if he had a gun out. Not IMO anyway.