Originally posted by: Skoorb
Went into circuit city, and then best buy. Honestly the displays at bestbuy are screwed up. They are not at the correct angle (half the tvs are way up pointed at the ground), so they look like ass. Plus, well they just look like ass. The ones in circuit city were in fact not too bad. I still need to see one up close with regular satellite and what not and some xbox games, etc. However, 65" was deemed by mrsskoorb as too big and I nearly agree. I suppose 56" would probably suffice.
One major problem with most is that there is nowhere for stereo equipment. I think one of the hitachis had a space underneath the tv (not big, but adequate), and then the more expensive tvs, that have no built in speakers, have a bunch of room under the tv. We have no need for built in speakers, but we were not psyched about the extra room required if we have to get standalone stands for the stereo equipment. Mrsskoorb insisted we check out a dining room table and I'm fearful that one purchase can't occur without the other, which jacks up the price quite significantly indeed!
I couldn't imagine dropping $2000 into a TV. My car cost me $3500, and I need that to get to work. A car helps me earn money. A TV doesn't.
Well, my take is that I spend enough time in front of the tv that $2k spent on one is not overdoing it at all. the average new purchase price of a car in the US is in the mid to high 20's. People generally spend more time in front of the tv than in their car, but the average new tv sells for under $1k. My 93 sentra, worth $1200, gets me from point A to B just as well as a car costing 20X as much, so why not save a bit of money there (heck, if I keep the car for 6 months it will pay for a tv, vs. a new car) and put it into something sweet like a 56" tv compared to a 27"?