• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Uber. The bully business model.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Skel said:
I just don't get how Uber is really anything special. Maybe I'm just not using it enough to care, but I can say that I've used both in various cities and they're shades of each other.
Click to expand...

It's pretty city dependent. I've had lots of random issues with taxis - my favorite practice are the various sanctioned non-compete agreements taxis have with each other. "Oh you want to go to that address? Thats 2x fare as we aren't allowed to pick people up in that neighborhood"

Then the 'broken' meters or the 'card reader not working' claim that magically works when you say you don't have cash or a debit card (after they get pissed off at you. One guy yelled at me "Why you not carry cash?! You knew you get cab ride!"). I can see shades of eachother as they serve the same purpose but you're much less likely to get ripped off with one over the other
 
Mai72 said:
I've lived in South Korea and Thailand, and in both countries the cabs were clean. The drivers were courteous and in SK they never expect a tip. In Thailand, they expect tips especially if you're a fa-lang (foreigner). In SK, you can even use your credit card. Oh, and in both countries riding in a cab is cheap. Unlike here in NJ. And many of the cabs are filthy.

I know in SK, Uber has been outlawed. I know they have Uber black which still runs in SK. In Thailand, they are everywhere. It's only a matter of time before people get upset I guess. But for now, I think Uber is great.
Click to expand...

Interesting.
 
thrilling said:
http://gizmodo.com/why-uber-is-losing-money-faster-than-any-tech-company-e-1785736918
Why Uber Is Losing Money Faster Than Any Tech Company Ever

The biggest cost to the company is the fee it pays out to drivers. According to the Bloomberg report, driver subsidies account for a majority of losses in the first half of 2016.
Hmmm. Driverless uber rides seems like it might be higher on their agenda they are letting on.
Click to expand...

Uber must subsidize > 50% of all pool rides.
 
I thought the point of Uber wasn't to eliminate taxi service, but to eliminate (most) people owning cars, since like 90% of a cars life is spent parked.

I must say, despite whomever thinks they are evil, it's quite a genius business model. All your assets are basically owned/leased by your contractors. Besides paying contractors, their liabilities must be extremely low, no?
 
z1ggy said:
I thought the point of Uber wasn't to eliminate taxi service, but to eliminate (most) people owning cars, since like 90% of a cars life is spent parked.
Click to expand...


71319481.jpg
 
norseamd said:
Link, or can you give some more details?
Click to expand...

Goes back more than 30 years. Those brain cells are dormant I guess, so cannot come up with the name of the company. Wiki didn't have it either. Last night over dinner, I did ask a couple tech old timers. They couldn't come up with a name either.
 
Ns1 said:
71319481.jpg
Click to expand...
Well taxi services might go belly up, but cars as mass transit are here to stay. Our country is much too spread out and horrible planned to make mass public transit even a remote possibility except for a few major cities.

We ruined that ish about 80 years ago and haven't looked back since.
 
z1ggy said:
Well taxi services might go belly up, but cars as mass transit are here to stay. Our country is much too spread out and horrible planned to make mass public transit even a remote possibility except for a few major cities.

We ruined that ish about 80 years ago and haven't looked back since.
Click to expand...

For people that live in surburbia or rural areas I agree, but Uber can easily replace car ownership in dense urban areas with a low enough $/mile cost.
 
Ns1 said:
For people that live in surburbia or rural areas I agree, but Uber can easily replace car ownership in dense urban areas with a low enough $/mile cost.
Click to expand...
Maybe. A lot of people who live in very dense population areas don't even have cars anyway. So replacing a taxi with an Uber, doesn't really do much.

All I've ever used it for is getting a ride when I'm drunk. I can't see taking one every day to work plus to the other random places I go.
 
Ns1 said:
For people that live in surburbia or rural areas I agree, but Uber can easily replace car ownership in dense urban areas with a low enough $/mile cost.
Click to expand...

Eh, thats just replacing the current taxi industry. Mass transit is so much more useful than car usage in urban areas.
 
z1ggy said:
Maybe. A lot of people who live in very dense population areas don't even have cars anyway. So replacing a taxi with an Uber, doesn't really do much.

All I've ever used it for is getting a ride when I'm drunk. I can't see taking one every day to work plus to the other random places I go.
Click to expand...

FWIW once dedicated electric self driving taxis get here the cost per passenger mile is supposed to get below current public transit. So if you do live in an area with public transit and use it, uber could very well become an option for everyday random trips.
 
norseamd said:
Eh, thats just replacing the current taxi industry. Mass transit is so much more useful than car usage in urban areas.
Click to expand...

In LA, an Uber Pool ride to the airport is cheaper than the mass transit options to the airport. So there's that...
 
TheGardener said:
Goes back more than 30 years. Those brain cells are dormant I guess, so cannot come up with the name of the company. Wiki didn't have it either. Last night over dinner, I did ask a couple tech old timers. They couldn't come up with a name either.
Click to expand...
Were you thinking of Wang?
 
Midwayman said:
FWIW once dedicated electric self driving taxis get here the cost per passenger mile is supposed to get below current public transit. So if you do live in an area with public transit and use it, uber could very well become an option for everyday random trips.
Click to expand...
Yeah self driving cars are the way of the future. However, I'm not so certain they will be coming our way very soon for mainstream use. There will probably be extreme lobbying against it by the auto industry as a whole, not to mention the extreme infrastructure changes that need to take place to support it on a mass scale.

I'm in no way rooting against it, I'm just skeptical it will become mainstream in my life time. Maybe on a smaller scale like only for taxi service in 1 city, etc.

PS I just read Uber lost over 1 billion so far this year. What's going on there? Costs rising? People using the service less?
 
When tipping point happens, the changes can no longer be stopped.

Historically, we can find many such examples where countless experts could not see technical breakthrough making a sea change in the world.

Tony Seba has few youtube videos where he shows photos of NYC Easter Sunday photos 13 years apart and the contrast is striking. He also points out AT&T's early estimate of cell phone penetration in 2000 to be off by 12 orders of magnitude!
 
There's also the whole "big brother" aspect to fully autonomous vehicles. And the fact that some people actually enjoy driving cars.

It also drives down competition among car makers. If people don't actually need to drive the car, why do they care about how fast it can go, or how it sounds (if it even has a gas engine) or how it handles. All speed limits would be obeyed, etc. The only things that would really matter were interior/exterior design & safety.

This is all assuming fully auto car though. My guess is there would be an optional "driver" mode where the person can still take over if they wanted.
 
sontakke said:
When tipping point happens, the changes can no longer be stopped.

Historically, we can find many such examples where countless experts could not see technical breakthrough making a sea change in the world.

Tony Seba has few youtube videos where he shows photos of NYC Easter Sunday photos 13 years apart and the contrast is striking. He also points out AT&T's early estimate of cell phone penetration in 2000 to be off by 12 orders of magnitude!
Click to expand...

Have a link to these videos? I looked up Tony Seba and the titles are cryptic enough to not know what to look at.
 
Here is an article based upon Tony Seba's presentation

http://mountaintownnews.net/2015/08/20/tony-sebas-startling-view-of-market-disruptions/

Here is the youtube presentation that I was talking about. He provides rational reasoning and previous data for his predictions. If your livelihood depends upon technology, you really need to hear him out. But it IS controversial and some of you are going to strongly disagree with him. Hopefully, we will get some intelligent discussion going.

 
Ns1 said:
In LA, an Uber Pool ride to the airport is cheaper than the mass transit options to the airport. So there's that...
Click to expand...

Cause LA mass transit is trash lol. Uber is prevalent in Paris but there are direct airport routes on their buses for 14 euro vs Uber for 30.
 
TheGardener said:
New York City is experiencing a surge in car accidents involving ride sharing cars. In two recent months this year, the city has seen 5 fatalities. There were just 7 in all of 2015. Other crashes have more than tripled in the last two years.

http://nypost.com/2016/08/25/avoid-car-services-if-you-want-to-survive-in-nyc/
Click to expand...

I didn't even bother clicking the link. The URL tells me the article is a waste of time -- /avoid-car-services-if-you-want-to-survive-in-nyc. Okay, a few people die out of how many rides over that 2 month period?
 
KnightBreed said:
I didn't even bother clicking the link. The URL tells me the article is a waste of time -- /avoid-car-services-if-you-want-to-survive-in-nyc. Okay, a few people die out of how many rides over that 2 month period?
Click to expand...

Up to you if you don't want to read the article. Just will say that never judge an article by the byline. Especially when it come to a tabloid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top