• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Two motorcyclists killed...

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Riding a motorcycle is, for the most part, as dangerous as you make it.

1. A significant amount of risk can be eliminated by wearing the proper gear all the time, no matter where you go. It won't help you from an impact but if you get thrown from the bike or go down and end up skidding around like a pinball you'll be much safer. This one always makes me shake my head in frustration when I see cruiser riders, Harley riders specifically because it seems that's the "culture", riding in jeans, a t-shirt, and a bandana. I understand that they aren't moving as fast as a sportbike rider, but they're also on a MUCH heavier and slower responding machine.

2. Riding in traffic is a calculated risk depending on speed and congestion. Throw in tired or distracted drivers and the risk percentage increases, however a large amount of risk can be eliminated by keeping your head on a swivel and never getting complacent. I've been tempted a whole lot of times to pull up next to a car and just start berating the driver because they couldn't wait 5 minutes to text their BFF about what so and so was wearing today at work (not to mention that texting is now illegal in San Antonio). I don't do it because I don't know how the stupid ass driver will respond.

3. Riding in the country can be even more dangerous because of the added risk of critters and random vehicles. Went out this past weekend and ran across a couple of deer and a dog during the ride. When you throw in tight corners where vehicles can haul ass around a corner and cut into your lane the percentage goes up even more.

With all the above said, I will still continue to ride my bike. I wear proper gear when riding around town, and on the weekends when I go out to have fun, I wear a leather 1-piece racing suit. As I experienced this weekend, I will bake my ass off, but the extra protection I have makes it all worthwhile.

I don't want to look back in 10 years and ask myself why I led a sheltered life inside so I could stay "safe". I want to be 50-60 years old and still be able to throw my leg over a sport bike or jump out of a otter and pull my own chute. I know it's a bit overused but:

“Life is not a journey to the grave with intentions of arriving safely in a pretty well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out and loudly proclaiming ... WOW! What a ride!”
 
Last edited:
Wait, you think motorcycles shouldn't ride side by side?

Don't put words in my mouth. I said nothing about what motorcyclists "should" do.

My post is about jumping to the conclusion that the car driver is solely at fault in this incident. And then saying she should die.

I've ridden bikes for 40 years, I don't see any reason why 2 bikers would run head on into a car. For them both to hit the car, I assume they were riding close to each other, as in side by side, through a chicane. There's a possibilty that they were paying attention to each other rather than looking down the road.

I don't see in the photos any real impediment to avoiding a head on collision. Looks like painted lines to me. At least one of the riders ended up on a path, why didn't he go there to avoid the collision ?

The easiest explanation for this crash is the riders didn't see the car or make any better decisions than the driver of the car did.

Which is probably what the jury thought too.

I'd like to reiterate, this road design is beyond stupid. It is the real reason for these deaths.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top