• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Trumps "last night in Sweden"

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Capt Caveman said:
More likely less than a year when we learn more about Russia running Trump. You post something from a year ago to back up Trump's comment about last night in Sweden. That's stupid.
Click to expand...
Which comes from the same network, show and even host who bribed kidnappers to steal a Middle Eastern child for a story they were shooting. Using sensationalist and extremely petty and shameful antics like this puts his source in a very bad light, so I wouldn't be surprised at all if the story was made up w/ paid actors. I mean, if you're willing to pay armed men to kidnap a child from their dad, then there's no shame in paying for actors.
 
Chiropteran said:
Nah. What is stupid is denying that there is anything at all going on in Sweden.
Click to expand...

This is actually correct. Sweden has been dealing with extremist terrorism for the last couple of decades, and they there was indeed an attack less than 3 weeks ago. http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/three-neo-nazi-suspected-bomb-attack-against-refugee-centres-sweden-1604686

They've been dealing with these shitheads for quite a while now. https://www.theguardian.com/world/1999/jul/03/garyyounge

So yes Trump is right it's terrible what's happening in Sweden.
 
Breaking News :

ISIS claims responsibility for the attacks happening inside Donald Trumps head. White House officials have backed ISIS claims, saying it is further proof that travel must be restricted from any nation capable of fabricating an attack inside the President’s head.

A spokesperson explained, “Inside the President’s head many terrible things are happening, terrible things. Lots of people are saying so. It is up to us to take any steps necessary to prevent these many terrible things happening in his imagination.

Anyone want to lay bets on where the next imaginary attack will take place?

I'm guessing Vulgaria, elbania, or Latveria or maybe even the American outpost colony on Mars
 
It's hard to believe this is an actual tweet from the President:
"Give the public a break - The FAKE NEWS media is trying to say that large scale immigration in Sweden is working out just beautifully. NOT!"

200.gif

Jaskalas said:
This is probably where Trump got his Sweden remark from
Click to expand...
He did confirm this as well...
 
So Trump sputters some demented shit and followers then scramble to find the thing that looks like the most. Yes, same play as yesterday before yesterday before yesterday ...........
 
Jaskalas said:
Obama was no stranger to slamming "right wing" media. Is the mirror of that really so shocking or disparaging?
Click to expand...

Did he go to the lengths Donald has, outright claiming war on the media? There's something between black and white. I don't really agree with Obama speaking out against certain media sources, but Donny has taken it to a new level of stupidity. Chris Wallace said as much himself, and considering his employer that carries some weight.
 
jman19 said:
Did he go to the lengths Donald has, outright claiming war on the media?
Click to expand...

So it's a measure of tone... and importance given by them.
Was Obama's a lash of anger, a moment in time... Was Trump's a lasting appeal, a political tool / rallying cry?
I think Obama meant it, and was consistent at calling out his opponents from start to end. Trump just has more opponents, and his style is not to speak carefully. Is he appealing to those divisions to some end? Sure... the media talks Trump 24/7 with full saturation. If anything, his "obsession" mirrors their own with him. It appears, to me, to be a simple matter of back and forth.

A thin skinned President who can't help but speak... poorly.
 
Jaskalas said:
So it's a measure of tone... and importance given by them.
Was Obama's a lash of anger, a moment in time... Was Trump's a lasting appeal, a political tool / rallying cry?
I think Obama meant it, and was consistent at calling out his opponents from start to end. Trump just has more opponents, and his style is not to speak carefully. Is he appealing to those divisions to some end? Sure... the media talks Trump 24/7 with full saturation. If anything, his "obsession" mirrors their own with him. It appears, to me, to be a simple matter of back and forth.

A thin skinned President who can't help but speak... poorly.
Click to expand...

I don't think he is just speaking poor - I think he legitimately cannot stand feeling like his character is being assailed, deserving or not. He's an ego maniac.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top