Trump would take foreign help in election and not tell FBI: "They have information. I think I'd take it"

[Fanatical Meat]

Stop making excuses for hilary.

Ran some more quick numbers
Jhhhnn one of our apex liberal posters has 1,000 Hillary Clinton search matched as of now an even 53,000 posts. Weird they are both even numbers...

1000/53000 = 1.88%

He mentions Hillary 25% less than Starbuck

Surprisingly SlowSpyder doesn’t mention Hillary much however I’d bet the numbers would change if I added Hilderbeast

66 Hillary mentions with 15,829 posts

66/15829 = 0.41%

Slow barely speaks her name.

Edit: apologies to slow, search says he has never used “Hilderbeast”. I think it may be Brandon who uses that term. Sorry slow I thought it was you.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Glenn’s results:
144 matched Hillary Clinton mentions
24,093 total posts

144/24,093 = 0.6% with a little rounding.

HomerJS:
64 search results
18,565 posts

64/18,565 = 0.35% with a little rounding

Starbuck still leads the pack.

 

[ch33zw1z]

Ran some more quick numbers
Jhhhnn one of our apex liberal posters has 1,000 Hillary Clinton search matched as of now an even 53,000 posts. Weird they are both even numbers...

1000/53000 = 1.88%

He mentions Hillary 25% less than Starbuck

Surprisingly SlowSpyder doesn’t mention Hillary much however I’d bet the numbers would change if I added Hilderbeast

66 Hillary mentions with 15,829 posts

66/15829 = 0.41%

Slow barely speaks her name.

Edit: apologies to slow, search says he has never used “Hilderbeast”. I think it may be Brandon who uses that term. Sorry slow I thought it was you.

*shrug*,

 

[Jhhnn]

Stop making excuses for hilary.

Aww, man, you know what the mere mention of her name does to Starbuck. Just stop it. You know he can't help himself. His brain just goes haywire.

 

[Starbuck1975]

Glenn’s results:
144 matched Hillary Clinton mentions
24,093 total posts

144/24,093 = 0.6% with a little rounding.

HomerJS:
64 search results
18,565 posts

64/18,565 = 0.35% with a little rounding

Starbuck still leads the pack.

Go me!

 

[Starbuck1975]

Aww, man, you know what the mere mention of her name does to Starbuck. Just stop it. You know he can't help himself. His brain just goes haywire.

All I need is for you to use the term “agitprop” and I have @Jhhnn bingo.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Go me!

There you go own it

 

[Jhhnn]

All I need is for you to use the term “agitprop” and I have @Jhhnn bingo.

The fact that you still get agitated over she who must not be named years after the fact indicates that you're a victim of it, for sure.

 

[Jhhnn]

Having established that he'd break the law to win re-election, Trump goes on to tell us he'd violate the 22nd amendment if given the chance-

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...416efdc0803_story.html?utm_term=.e77924c319ef

Whose brain did we put in the Oval Office? Abby Somebody? Abby Normal?

 

[Starbuck1975]

The fact that you still get agitated over she who must not be named years after the fact indicates that you're a victim of it, for sure.

And I can always count on you to be right there to make the usual tired excuses any time there is criticism of she who won’t be named.

I’ll make a deal with you. I’ll never criticize Hillary again. The outcome of her political career speaks for itself.

 

[cytg111]

If you want a fact based rundown on Steele dossier and why its not "Russia if you are mistening"... Read this

https://twitter.com/x/status/1140076913202884608

 

[darkswordsman17]

Stop making excuses for hilary.

But some book says that allegedly Obama said she ran a soulless campaign!

 

[ch33zw1z]

There you go own it

He's broken free of his denial. It's the first step to admitting there's a problem. Obsession.

 

[ch33zw1z]

And I can always count on you to be right there to make the usual tired excuses any time there is criticism of she who won’t be named.

I’ll make a deal with you. I’ll never criticize Hillary again. The outcome of her political career speaks for itself.

Are you ready for that kind of commitment?

 

[Starbuck1975]

He's broken free of his denial. It's the first step to admitting there's a problem. Obsession.

I am not in denial. I simply have a strong opinion. There is certainly an obsession with that opinion.

Are you ready for that kind of commitment?

Sure, its not like these conversations are ever productive. I won’t mention her again.

 

[ch33zw1z]

I am not in denial. I simply have a strong opinion. There is certainly an obsession with that opinion.

Right, you're not in denial as long as your accept that you have a problem.

Your "strong opinion" is your basis for changing discussions to fit your obsessive view.

Sure, its not like these conversations are ever productive. I won’t mention her again.

why would they be? no matter how many times you bring it up, the result is still the same. You don't engage the topics in good faith, regularly digress into Hilary hate, I mean...she lost, get over it.

 

[Starbuck1975]

Right, you're not in denial as long as your accept that you have a problem.

Your "strong opinion" is your basis for changing discussions to fit your obsessive view.



why would they be? no matter how many times you bring it up, the result is still the same. You don't engage the topics in good faith, regularly digress into Hilary hate, I mean...she lost, get over it.

I’ve already made the commitment. You can put down your buckets and finally rest.

 

[ch33zw1z]

I’ve already made the commitment. You can put down your buckets and finally rest.

Yea, now you're just being an idiot while attemping to be clever. You're welcome to point out exactly where I've picked up any buckets in this thread, you won't, but I'm sure you can try to spin something somehow, and maybe make it about how the Democrats are to blame as well.

 

[Starbuck1975]

Yea, now you're just being an idiot while attemping to be clever. You're welcome to point out exactly where I've picked up any buckets in this thread, you won't, but I'm sure you can try to spin something somehow, and maybe make it about how the Democrats are to blame as well.

I guess you decided you would rather continue carrying them. Proceed.

 

[ch33zw1z]

I guess you decided you would rather continue carrying them. Proceed.

yawn, like i said, you can't

 

[ch33zw1z]

regarding the actual topic at hand:

 

[Starbuck1975]

yawn, like i said, you can't

I marked with a heart the post where you picked up your buckets.

 

[glenn1]

Yes, particularly when the person in question worked for an allied govt. There's no issue of hidden obligation because he was paid in full for his work. The Dems don't owe Steele anything, which can't be said for Trump's relationship with Russian interests.

Then the next time Trump gets information from Russia or wherever he pays them some token sum (like a dollar, or even a penny) and therefore they're "paid in full for their work" and thus he's in the clear. The Kremlin should make it easier and set up their own Tax ID number so the Trump campaign can provide them a 1099 form to provide investigators next go around.

 

[ch33zw1z]

I marked with a heart the post where you picked up your buckets.

Except I didn't. I merely pointed out how you present things. Oh well. Maybe you should check that double sided mirror again. While you're at it, tell us again how the republican party is the party of personal responsibility and strong moral fiber.

 

[Starbuck1975]

Except I didn't. I merely pointed out how you present things. Oh well. Maybe you should check that double sided mirror again.

No. You did what many do, which is dismiss people who don’t align to your worldview with a snarky condescending remark, because that is easier than acknowledging you might be wrong.

Mirrors don’t work on me, I am a vampire.