News Trump weaponizes Social Security in Maine, putting newborns at risk

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,251
9,724
136
Yeah—reread that post title two more times so that you understand the gravity of the situation we’re in.


On Feb. 21, Maine's Democratic governor, Janet Mills, publicly upbraided Donald Trump over his transgender policies.

Here's what happened after that. Out of the blue, the Trump administration canceled a contract that allowed parents in the state to apply for Social Security numbers for their newborns by simply checking a box on a form at the hospital—the way parents in all 50 states have done for decades, as the Social Security Administration has said.

The change meant that new parents would have to bring their infants to one of only eight Social Security field offices in Maine, sometimes by traveling for hours, exposing the newborns to infectious diseases in public.


“That nasty woman said some mean things about me. It’d be a shame if something happened to your state’s social security application process that forced parents with newborns to travel several hours and put babies at risk! Oh well, not my problem. Blue state governors better take note before you criticize me!”
 
Dec 10, 2005
27,466
11,777
136
Well this is what approximately 45% of the people in Maine voted for. We need to continually remind people of this.
EC has to go, popular vote is the way.
People should take their civic responsibility of voting more seriously. Your voting choices ultimately matter, and a lot of people treat it more like a team sport than something that can have very serious outcomes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

GodisanAtheist

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2006
7,886
8,979
136
You have so much technology and IT companies, but your public sector seems hugely ineffective.

Here in Denmark the midwife simply add the data of the child into the IT system and then the social security number is given to the child.

-NO YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE ARE TOTALLY DIFFERENT AND WE CANT DO THE THINGS YOU GUYS DO OVER THERE OVER HERE BECAUSE THINGS ARE DIFFERENT.

DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?!
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
21,699
6,138
136
Well this is what approximately 45% of the people in Maine voted for. We need to continually remind people of this.
EC has to go, popular vote is the way.
Trump won the popular vote.
Also, it appears that the decision has been reversed. People in Main can check the box again.
 
Last edited:

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,018
29,097
136
Trump won the popular vote.
Also, it appears that the decision has been reversed. People in Main can check the box again.
Doesn’t it bother you even a little bit that there was such a decision made in the first place?
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
71,884
31,962
136
You have so much technology and IT companies, but your public sector seems hugely ineffective.

Here in Denmark the midwife simply add the data of the child into the IT system and then the social security number is given to the child.
Your system is flawed because it doesn’t provide the opportunity for the government to confirm that the baby is white and therefore worthy of a social security number.
 

Lanyap

Elite Member
Dec 23, 2000
8,242
2,329
136
Your system is flawed because it doesn’t provide the opportunity for the government to confirm that the baby is white and therefore worthy of a social security number.



Some people say trump is working on an EO to only give partial SS#s to non-white and female babys.
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
21,699
6,138
136
Does it ever bother you that you can never post in good faith and seem to like being a dishonest shithead?
So because you don't have an answer you resort to personal insults based on your own anger and stupidity.
I'll go ahead and answer for you, Trump got more votes than Harris, that means he won the popular vote. There is no ambiguity, there is no contrived logic that allows you to work around that fact, nor can you create some new definition of winning the popular vote. 50% + 1 makes the grade.
 
Dec 10, 2005
27,466
11,777
136
So because you don't have an answer you resort to personal insults based on your own anger and stupidity.
I'll go ahead and answer for you, Trump got more votes than Harris, that means he won the popular vote. There is no ambiguity, there is no contrived logic that allows you to work around that fact, nor can you create some new definition of winning the popular vote. 50% + 1 makes the grade.
Still not a majority of the votes cast because plurality!= Majority. Words have meanings.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,778
17,319
136
Trump won the popular vote.
Also, it appears that the decision has been reversed. People in Main can check the box again.
Correct and popular vote should equal win.
Point still stands this is what 45% of the people in Maine voted for.
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
21,699
6,138
136
Still not a majority of the votes cast because plurality!= Majority. Words have meanings.
The only meaning here is votes cast for Harris or Trump. The 2% they didn't get were throwaway's, they don't count in the Harris/Trump race.
Trying to come up with some sort of logic that diminishes Trump is a foolish waste of time. He won the election, he's the President of the United States, get over it.