News Trump weaponizes Social Security in Maine, putting newborns at risk

[Brainonska511]

The only meaning here is votes cast for Harris or Trump. The 2% they didn't get were throwaway's, they don't count in the Harris/Trump race.
Trying to come up with some sort of logic that diminishes Trump is a foolish waste of time. He won the election, he's the President of the United States, get over it.

Sorry, no matter how you try to define it, he didn't get a majority. You don't get to rewrite the dictionary.

 

[Indus]

Sorry, no matter how you try to define it, he didn't get a majority. You don't get to rewrite the dictionary.

Delay
Deny
Distract
Dismiss
Denigrate

Their usual M.O.

 

[feralkid]

That wouldn't have saved us from Trump 2.0. but it would have stopped 1.0 in its tracks.

True, and that likely could have precluded 2.0.

 

[mindless1]

Did I miss it, or is everyone still in TDS mode and they missed it, that this has been fixed?

Press Release | Press Office | SSA

2025 Press Releases

www.ssa.gov

 

[nickqt]

The only TDS are people who support open treason by the Russian asset cosplaying as a US President.

 

[mindless1]

The only TDS are people who support open treason by the Russian asset cosplaying as a US President participate in these topics.

FTFY

Do I agree with everything Trump does? Absolutely not. I didn't agree with everything Biden did either, nor Obama or Bush, and so on, though Clinton getting BJs was hilarious. I didn't get my panties in a knot and whine about it, hoping someone would agree.

 

[WilliamM2]

FTFY

Do I agree with everything Trump does? Absolutely not. I didn't agree with everything Biden did either, nor Obama or Bush, and so on, though Clinton getting BJs was hilarious. I didn't get my panties in a knot and whine about it, hoping someone would agree.

Aren't you participating?

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Sorry, no matter how you try to define it, he didn't get a majority. You don't get to rewrite the dictionary.

We’ve been over this, Trump received the most votes.
We can bicker about wording but regardless if you want the candidate that gets to most votes winning Trump won by getting the most votes.

 

[Brainonska511]

We’ve been over this, Trump received the most votes.
We can bicker about wording but regardless if you want the candidate that gets to most votes winning Trump won by getting the most votes.

Yes, Trump won a plurality of votes and the EC. He doesn't have some insane "mandate" to do whatever the fuck he wants, like weaponizing the federal government against his perceived enemies. (You know, doing all the things Greenman claimed he (Greenman) was against for years).

 

[HomerJS]

So did Trump get more votes than Harris or not? Why do we suddenly need to redefine winning?

You still don't get the fact you are still justifying Trump’s henious acts by just saying “he won the election”

You didn’t comment at all on what he did. Still don’t get it?

If Trump has protesters killed in the streets will your only response be, “well he won”?

 

[APU_Fusion]

You still don't get the fact you are still justifying Trump’s henious acts by just saying “he won the election”

You didn’t comment at all on what he did. Still don’t get it?

If Trump has protesters killed in the streets will your only response be, “well he won”?

Yes, greenman will justify anything vile to live in his bubbled reality of willful ignorance

 

[fskimospy]

FTFY

Do I agree with everything Trump does? Absolutely not. I didn't agree with everything Biden did either, nor Obama or Bush, and so on, though Clinton getting BJs was hilarious. I didn't get my panties in a knot and whine about it, hoping someone would agree.

You would agree that Trump is a criminal though, right?

 

[fskimospy]

You still don't get the fact you are still justifying Trump’s henious acts by just saying “he won the election”

You didn’t comment at all on what he did. Still don’t get it?

If Trump has protesters killed in the streets will your only response be, “well he won”?

Dude seriously go search his history. When the popular vote was brought up in the past his response was it is irrelevant.

Funny how the popular vote is irrelevant when conservatives lose it but suddenly relevant when they win it.

 

[Brainonska511]

Dude seriously go search his history. When the popular vote was brought up in the past his response was it is irrelevant.

Funny how the popular vote is irrelevant when conservatives lose it but suddenly relevant when they win it.

Legitimacy is whatever gives Republicans an advantage, at least according to Greenman.

 

[DZero]

Trump will bury us, unless we ALL stop him.

Sadly a civil war is unavoidable. Those "pro" life are also pro human experiment too.

 

[dank69]

Did anyone check the Susan Collins Furrowed Brow Index?

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Did anyone check the Susan Collins Furrowed Brow Index?

Yes

Page 2193 - P&Ns middle name is and

Page 2193 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

forums.anandtech.com

 

[Lanyap]

Like 3/5 of a number?

Yes, that's the number I heard from some people.

 

[Lanyap]

Trump won the popular vote.
Also, it appears that the decision has been reversed. People in Main can check the box again.

Why do you think the trump administration took that action in the first place.

 

[ivwshane]

Yes, greenman will justify anything vile to live in his bubbled reality of willful ignorance

Not really, he just won’t comment on it or acknowledge it in any meaningful way. His posts are less useful than the typical trolls we get. At least with the trolls we have an opportunity to address talking points.