Trump University - a fraud according to students

[jackstar7]

I do find the cc part interesting. We will see how it plays out.

What exactly are you waiting to see play out before you adjust your opinion?

Or is it, as we all suspect, that nothing will do that?

 

[LegendKiller]

What exactly are you waiting to see play out before you adjust your opinion?

Or is it, as we all suspect, that nothing will do that?

Change my mind to what? What are the alternatives?

 

[jackstar7]

Change my mind to what? What are the alternatives?

Well, instead of thinking Trump unassailable, you might see him as assailable. That'd be a start.

I'd accept baby steps.

 

[emperus]

Change my mind to what? What are the alternatives?

You can accept that he is a con man. You can do that and still decide to vote for him.

 

[Charmonium]

You can accept that he is a con man. You can do that and still decide to vote for him.

Definitely. You're free to make any decision you want, even if to many of us it seems irrational. We're going to object to some extent because if Donald really is the crazy douche bag we think he is, your decision also affects us. But on principle, I don't think anyone is going to object to your voting for him.

What bothers me and what bothers a lot of others here is the idea that you can somehow justify a vote for Trump when he has the attention span of a fruit fly and can't seem to come up with a single cogent policy on virtually anything that doesn't fit into 140 characters or less.

 

[LegendKiller]

You can accept that he is a con man. You can do that and still decide to vote for him.

As opposed to a con woman and a communist?

 

[LegendKiller]

Well, instead of thinking Trump unassailable, you might see him as assailable. That'd be a start.

I'd accept baby steps.

I never said he was unassailable.

 

[emperus]

As opposed to a con woman and a communist?

Again, here we go with the deflection.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

As opposed to a con woman and a communist?

stay on target....

this is about drumpf and his prestigious univer... ahh fuck it, I can't finish that sentence.

But the thread is about drumpf and that 'school'

 

[LegendKiller]

stay on target....

this is about drumpf and his prestigious univer... ahh fuck it, I can't finish that sentence.

But the thread is about drumpf and that 'school'

He asked me to consider an alternative, I asked what.

I love this new tactic you lefties use. Pretty funny.

 

[MongGrel]

He asked me to consider an alternative, I asked what.

I love this new tactic you lefties use. Pretty funny.

Staying on topic ?

It is a silly ruse.

 

[jackstar7]

As opposed to a con woman and a communist?

No one is saying you cannot vote for whomever you please.

But reality wants to be involved in the decision making process.

 

[LegendKiller]

Staying on topic ?

It is a silly ruse.

I haven't been the one to veer from the topics. Lefties do their lefty thing, veer from the topic and blame me for it.

 

[jackstar7]

I haven't been the one to veer from the topics. Lefties do their lefty thing, veer from the topic and blame me for it.

Disagree.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

He asked me to consider an alternative, I asked what.

I love this new tactic you lefties use. Pretty funny.

let me help, cause this 'lefty' wants to try to help those in need, and brother, do you need some help.

how about being more critical of drumpf and his misbegotten messages? that could be an alternative, no?

 

[LegendKiller]

let me help, cause this 'lefty' wants to try to help those in need, and brother, do you need some help.

how about being more critical of drumpf and his misbegotten messages? that could be an alternative, no?

How about you do the same for hillbilly and we'll meet in the middle.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

How about you do the same for hillbilly and we'll meet in the middle.

stay on target.
or just go rub one out in the corner with speedy and mikey, not even worth the effort anymore.

 

[jackstar7]

How about you do the same for hillbilly and we'll meet in the middle.

You keep assuming that all of your enemies are blind to the faults of Hilary. That's a pretty poor assumption.

Embrace skepticism, not cynicism.

 

[LegendKiller]

You keep assuming that all of your enemies are blind to the faults of Hilary. That's a pretty poor assumption.

Embrace skepticism, not cynicism.

If they attacked her with the zeal they want me to attack trump I might be more likely to attack trump. I have yet to see somebody like eskimospy admit that her school ties are equally as bad. Which, in my mind, is putting it mildly since I think they are actually far worse.

 

[MongGrel]

If they attacked her with the zeal they want me to attack trump I might be more likely to attack trump. I have yet to see somebody like eskimospy admit that her school ties are equally as bad. Which, in my mind, is putting it mildly since I think they are actually far worse.

And still off topic, you're trying to get that last word in.

 

[jackstar7]

If they attacked her with the zeal they want me to attack trump I might be more likely to attack trump. I have yet to see somebody like eskimospy admit that her school ties are equally as bad. Which, in my mind, is putting it mildly since I think they are actually far worse.

No one wants you to attack Trump.

You are actually supporting my position that you find him (or just want him) unassailable with that kind of rhetoric.

Also, stop asking for false equivalencies. That's not a productive road to travel rhetorically either.


EDIT: But do whatever you want. Just don't expect or demand that people respect your arguments when you don't demonstrate that you do.

 

[LegendKiller]

And still off topic, you're trying to get that last word in.

Has nothing to do with the last word. I am just addressing posts as they come.

 

[LegendKiller]

No one wants you to attack Trump.

You are actually supporting my position that you find him (or just want him) unassailable with that kind of rhetoric.

Also, stop asking for false equivalencies. That's not a productive road to travel rhetorically either.


EDIT: But do whatever you want. Just don't expect or demand that people respect your arguments when you don't demonstrate that you do.

Again, I have posted criticisms of him before and will continue to do so


It isn't a false equivalency. Talk about rhetorical fallacies. You face intellectual dishonesty by applying a double standard. You hold yourself above continual criticism of your candidate when faced with the inevitable juxtaposition require it of others for their opinion to be valid.

 

[brycejones]

This thread is delivering

 

[DrPizza]

Hey, speaking of the money coming... and to put this thread back on track (I can see why you want to derail it, since you're a Trump fanatic)...

It appears that Trump University was under investigation by Greg Abbott. He dropped the investigation, and then received a $35,000 donation for his campaign. Gee, that doesn't look suspicious does it? Looks like he was bribed by Trump to drop the Trump University investigation.

http://www.twcnews.com/tx/austin/po...xas-dropped.html?cid=facebook_TWC_News_Austin

If you ask me, THIS is deserving of a federal probe.

Holy shit! Trump and several politicians are crooks!

[/FONT]
"Oh, thanks for the bribe. Hey everyone, we don't have sufficient grounds to proceed." Looks like several officials need to be investigated.

Since Legendkiller keeps derailing, let's get back on topic. Legendkiller, how do you respond to this??? (And, please don't start your sentence with, "buh, Hillary...")