Trump University - a fraud according to students

[brycejones]

A weak candidate? She's a slut shaming feminazi hag that is a way bigger whore than any of the women bill fucked.

That he won't appoint liberal feminist or complete cuck as a SCOTUS judge is a 100% plus.

Be a man and tell us exactly what you mean by complete cuck.

 

[LegendKiller]

Be a man and tell us exactly what you mean by complete cuck.

You know what it means. Dont play coy.

 

[ivwshane]

Read this first: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-donor-sensitive-intelligence-board/story?id=39710624

I've already read it. What was illegal about it?

 

[brycejones]

You know what it means. Dont play coy.

So you are afraid to define it here. It has several possible meanings. I find it funny that people who use this word are afraid to fess up to what they mean by it.

Wonder why that is?

 

[jackstar7]

I've already read it. What was illegal about it?

I'm not familiar enough with the law to know how placing someone unqualified into that position breaks a law, but considering it looks like he paid his way into the position, it might come down to simple bribery.

If the guy used his access to further his own interests that would also be troubling.

One way or another, it is bad optics for the Clinton campaign if this story gets traction for a cycle or two.

 

[jackstar7]

A weak candidate? She's a slut shaming feminazi hag that is a way bigger whore than any of the women bill fucked.

That he won't appoint liberal feminist or complete cuck as a SCOTUS judge is a 100% plus.

So yeah... too much emotion.

You might want to dial that back a bit and get some perspective.

 

[jackstar7]

You know what it means. Dont play coy.

I have no idea what it means. So please do explain.

 

[LegendKiller]

So yeah... too much emotion.

You might want to dial that back a bit and get some perspective.

I'm just going to play the woman card. It's sexist to claim somebody is too emotional.

 

[jackstar7]

I'm just going to play the woman card. It's sexist to claim somebody is too emotional.

I don't expect that to work out really well for you. But go ahead and see how it plays.

 

[ivwshane]

I'm not familiar enough with the law to know how placing someone unqualified into that position breaks a law, but considering it looks like he paid his way into the position, it might come down to simple bribery.

If the guy used his access to further his own interests would also be troubling.

One way or another, it is bad optics for the Clinton campaign if this story gets traction for a cycle or two.

That's not how bribery works.

http://bribery.uslegal.com/federal-laws-on-bribery/

I've also already have my opinion on the matter in the other thread.

 

[jackstar7]

That's not how bribery works.

http://bribery.uslegal.com/federal-laws-on-bribery/

I've also already have my opinion on the matter in the other thread.

Fair enough.

This still appears to be one of Clinton's sloppier moves. The guy had to be vetted for the position. That they couldn't even fake a reasonable reason to have him in there is sad. Even if he was just able to construct or advise on the construction of algorithms that might show reasonable simulations of threat levels on a global scale... I mean I just did it right here. Them having basically nothing to say for this guy and him not being comfortable defending himself and stepping down... it all looks pretty damning.

Again, she is likely well-insulated from any of the potential wrong-doing, so this likely won't really hurt her campaign. Basically she'd have to fumble things to make it a story that lasts beyond the weekend.

Meanwhile Trump will surely keep digging his way down deeper with Trump U and all the related fiascos.

 

[agent00f]

No, the point is that you can't understand relative severity. You think that the size of the amount matters across the board. You fail shillary .

People who live in reality can understand why the difference between 1 and 1000 matters. Someone here claimed that I see the world in black and white, I suspect they've never figured out what that means.

Never figuring things out is a common theme with political sycophants. For example they believe everyone else is like them, so if they're a shill for some candidate, then whoever opposes them must be a shill for some other candidate.

 

[agent00f]

Because it is a donation until you can show that it is a bribe. There may be a conflict of interest but 25k is peanuts if it is a bribe.

Consider for example what LegendKiller and you consider a bribe in the Laureate case. Per the page I linked, Laureate paid Bill $16 million. Then the State Dept grants to a nonprofit run by the CEO of Laureate increased by 5/10million a year.

First, this accusation involves many tentative links all of which need evidence to be true, and so far none have. Or in simple terms, the prosecution must have all these ducks in a row, when not a single duck actually exists.

Second, the accusation makes no sense. The extra state dept money (to some other org) is revenue, only a portion of which is profit. The money paid to bill comes out of profit. Even assuming Hillary has complete control over established dept grant committees which is far fetched, and assuming a healthy profit margin which is rather difficult for a non-profit, whoever's making the bride isn't coming out ahead.

Unfortunately trying to figure out whether things make sense or not involves minimal thinking that's still typically well beyond the sort who make these types of accusations.

 

[brycejones]

You know what it means. Dont play coy.

I have no idea what it means. So please do explain.

As usual LK refuses to define it. So I guess this must be the meaning:

Short for cuckservative. The word cuck is most commonly used on Twitter to describe anti-white whites. While it was originally formed with the original meaning of cuck hold the use of the word cuck does not necessarily denote a sexual connotation. Cucks do not care about Islamic countries throwing gays off buildings or hanging them as much as the cake baker who is Christian and won't serve gay wedding customers. Cucks give a free pass to anyone who criticizes them for fear of looking racist or homophobic. The word originated from White nationalists vocabulary but it is widely used by all.


An interesting insight into how extreme he has become.

 

[LegendKiller]

Consider for example what LegendKiller and you consider a bribe in the Laureate case. Per the page I linked, Laureate paid Bill $16 million. Then the State Dept grants to a nonprofit run by the CEO of Laureate increased by 5/10million a year.

First, this accusation involves many tentative links all of which need evidence to be true, and so far none have. Or in simple terms, the prosecution must have all these ducks in a row, when not a single duck actually exists.

Second, the accusation makes no sense. The extra state dept money (to some other org) is revenue, only a portion of which is profit. The money paid to bill comes out of profit. Even assuming Hillary has complete control over established dept grant committees which is far fetched, and assuming a healthy profit margin which is rather difficult for a non-profit, whoever's making the bride isn't coming out ahead.

Unfortunately trying to figure out whether things make sense or not involves minimal thinking that's still typically well beyond the sort who make these types of accusations.

You're not great at maths, are you?

25.5 - 9 = 16.5mm.

It doesn't involve any tentative links at all. The link is no more than what is already there, we have seen her do this numerous times. Pay for play. Same with the guy who got on the nuke board.

It doesn't matter if it is profit, it is influence. Just because they donate to the CGI, or the WJCF, doesn't mean that BillyBob and HillBilly get all of the money, does it? No, but that money goes a long way to creating influence, bribes...etc

Let's see what type of attacks you've managed so far? You claim I don't know math, but you have utterly fucking failed at every aspect of math. Then you claim you're smarter, or that somebody is a redneck, if they don't agree with you. You aren't smart and not everybody is a redneck, as evidenced by the fact that you don't really have any good retort to anything other than *I'M SMARTER THAN YOU, YOU MEANIE!*. Your debate tactics are quite pathetic, which is why you can't win at anything but calling somebody stupid or a redneck.

Since you refuse to give up your prior account, then the only logical summary is that you're one of Hillary's paid shills, intended to go out on the internet and do this shit.

 

[LegendKiller]

As usual LK refuses to define it. So I guess this must be the meaning:

Short for cuckservative. The word cuck is most commonly used on Twitter to describe anti-white whites. While it was originally formed with the original meaning of cuck hold the use of the word cuck does not necessarily denote a sexual connotation. Cucks do not care about Islamic countries throwing gays off buildings or hanging them as much as the cake baker who is Christian and won't serve gay wedding customers. Cucks give a free pass to anyone who criticizes them for fear of looking racist or homophobic. The word originated from White nationalists vocabulary but it is widely used by all.


An interesting insight into how extreme he has become.

Cucks don't care. It's why they equate anybody who is a non-cuck to, say, ISIS. Because in their minds anybody who isn't out to fuck their own country is a "nationalist". That is the point of a cuck, they work against their own interests merely because they have some form of self-hate, or at least self denial, about the reality of the world. They are almost akin to Libertopians, they believe that the free market actually exists outside of those who practice it. And they believe that even if 1% practice it, the 1% benefits. That ain't how it works.

Ohh, gosh no, "nationalists". Such a bad word. yes, I love my country, is that such a horrible thing now?

Do you not love your country?

 

[jackstar7]

You love your country, but you don't think it's great.

 

[LegendKiller]

You love your country, but you don't think it's great.

A lot of people are actively working to make it less great.

 

[jackstar7]

A lot of people are actively working to make it less great.

Funny. I remember when there was much hostility towards people who said things could be better and American was anything less than perfect. How the times change...

I assume Trump isn't on your list. Also funny.

 

[buckshot24]

Consider for example what LegendKiller and you consider a bribe in the Laureate case. Per the page I linked, Laureate paid Bill $16 million. Then the State Dept grants to a nonprofit run by the CEO of Laureate increased by 5/10million a year.

I have no idea what you're talking about. I don't think anything about this payment as I've not read up on it, at all.

Unfortunately trying to figure out whether things make sense or not involves minimal thinking that's still typically well beyond the sort who make these types of accusations.

First you assume I am making an accusation then insult me for making an accusation I'm not making. What a swell addition to the forum you're becoming!

 

[buckshot24]

Hey jackstar7, Lets assume Trump paid off the AG as you believe. Is it worse to accept a bribe or to give a bribe?

 

[jackstar7]

Hey jackstar7, Lets assume Trump paid off the AG as you believe. Is it worse to accept a bribe or to give a bribe?

Why is that distinction required? Why does one have to be worse?

 

[buckshot24]

Why is that distinction required? Why does one have to be worse?

It doesn't. You can say there is no difference if you want.

 

[jackstar7]

It doesn't. You can say there is no difference if you want.

Great, so why did you ask?

 

[OverVolt]

I gotta say when protesters at trump rallies start burning the make america great again hats and start posting them online like dumb twats they make themselves look pretty bad.