Paratus
Lifer
- Jun 4, 2004
- 17,636
- 15,822
- 146
In the midst of your sarcasm you are missing one critical point in all of this. Having the oil in a pipeline has minimized the contamination area versus transport by tanker car which exposes much more of the environment to the risk of contamination.
You don't understand the benefits and risk trade off between a pipeline and a tank car.
Tank cars have failures at about twice the rate of pipelines. They can also cause fires if they crash a speed.
Pipelines leak until someone stops the flow. Tank cars can only leak what it's in the tank.
I believe the IEA puts total gallons leaked via pipeline at multiples of loss via tank car spills.
So no, you are incorrect, this pipeline "did not minimize the contamination area". It's only benefit was the reduced likelihood of failure which it lost when it leaked.