• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Trump Slams Hillary - Full Text

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
emperus said:
Yeah an elected one. My point being, it's pretty rare to have major political figures in your party write op-eds saying they are voting for the other parties nominee or give interviews saying they won't back their parties nominee.

They are trying for a floor fight by getting enough delegates to agree to nominate someone else.
Click to expand...

They're trying to disentangle themselves from the Donald, to somehow claim the the Party doesn't stand for the same things he does. They're trying to disavow responsibility for the mind fuck they've worked on the base for decades.

Republicans built that base, turned people's best qualities against them while the true Bush constituency has been looting the middle class & the whole country in pursuit of that trickle down goodness. In voting for Donald, the base contends that the false promises they still believe in can come true. He's their Messiah.
 
emperus said:
It seems you don't know the meaning of hack. Hack is by definition the majority of your posts in this forum including this one.
Click to expand...
Well brother, don't forget we are brothers, I most definitely come from a certain perspective but I call out Trump when he deserves it.
Now, you seem incapable of staying on topic. But I'll bite. This is what I wrote.
Click to expand...
You're using polls as justification for thinking Trump is a bad person. On what planet does this make sense? It's like arguing that chocolate chip cookies are the best because more people like them. It makes zero sense. All it means is more people like chocolate chip cookies it says nothing whatsoever about the cookies themselves.
If you can find me a significant Democrat who has distanced themselves from Hilary, or are trying to take the nomination away from her, then you may have a point. But you won't. The view of Trump is consistent across party lines.
Click to expand...
So one need to try and take the nomination away from Hillary or it doesn't count? You're completely insane on this issue. Trump has made lots of people completely insane. And you make these arbitrary requirements as if they mean anything. In ANY case, other people's opinion of Trump says nothing whatsoever about who Trump really is which is what I was asking you about.
You sound like a zealot and treat Trump as an idol. If you confined your argument to; "Trump is an idiot, but I care more about conservative justices". Maybe people would respect you more. But arguments like this, make you sound like the zealot you are. Get it together.
Click to expand...
Trump is not my idol. He is a very flawed person, I've told you this in PM, so I'm not understanding why you'd say this. You act as if what you believe about Trump is absolute fact when it is nothing more than your opinion and you use other opinions of him as justification!

You don't know who Trump really is you have beliefs about who Trump really is. You'd do better by making that distinction in your own head.
 
emperus said:
Yeah an elected one. My point being, it's pretty rare to have major political figures in your party write op-eds saying they are voting for the other parties nominee or give interviews saying they won't back their parties nominee.

They are trying for a floor fight by getting enough delegates to agree to nominate someone else.
Click to expand...
In emperus world this means he's right about who a person really is. :thumbsdown:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top