• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Trump: No Judges of Mexican Descent Allowed

Page 26 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
buckshot24 said:
I've been critical of Trump on that issue. What more do you want?
Somebody lied about what Trump said about Muslim judges. You don't care about the truth.
Click to expand...

Topic? What topic?

Will bigotry make America great again?

Vote Vulgarian so we can show the world what we believe in!
 
buckshot24 said:
Well, it is obviously false to say Trump said that a Muslim simply couldn't be objective in a case involving him. Since one side won't admit that then it seems pretty obvious who is being objective about this.
Click to expand...

This was the post Moonbean replied to. There was nothing in that post that was inaccurate.

Jhhnn said:
Dancin' fool, huh?

Trump said that Curiel was biased against him because Curiel is a Mexican who doesn't want the Wonder Wall. He attacked Curiel's citizenship, loyalty & integrity while pandering to bigotry.

Just the facts.

In your head, you'll find a way around that to vote for him anyway, right? Of course you will.
Click to expand...
 
Has ES acknowledge that he called me stupid while being a complete incompetent bafoon about the meaning of "la raza" and how it doesn't mean the human race yet? Does he have the integrity to apologize or not?
 
emperus said:
This was the post Moonbean replied to. There was nothing in that post that was inaccurate.
Click to expand...
I didn't say there was anything "inaccurate" in that post. I said he is refusing to acknowledge that Trump has been misrepresented about the Muslim judge not being able to be impartial. To me, it is him who isn't being objective since he can't even admit this minor detail.
 
Jhhnn said:
So what? Buckshot's purpose in life is to drag every thread critical of Trump off topic.
Click to expand...
Except I have agreed that he shouldn't have mentioned the judge's heritage. He was wrong.

In this thread somebody lied about what Trump said about Muslim judges. I point that out and I'm trying to drag the thread off topic?
 
buckshot24 said:
Except I have agreed that he shouldn't have mentioned the judge's heritage. He was wrong.

In this thread somebody lied about what Trump said about Muslim judges. I point that out and I'm trying to drag the thread off topic?
Click to expand...

Still trying, obviously. If you want to talk about that it's easy enough to start a thread, isn't it?

The judge's heritage? Trump has doubled & tripled down on the bigotry he expressed while his supporters try desperately to keep people talking about anything else. Your own shameless efforts have been epic.
 
Jhhnn said:
Still trying, obviously. If you want to talk about that it's easy enough to start a thread, isn't it?
Click to expand...
We don't need another thread, those who have stated that Trump said Muslim judges can't be objective in his cases are lying and that has happened in this thread. I didn't bring it up.
The judge's heritage? Trump has doubled & tripled down on the bigotry he expressed while his supporters try desperately to keep people talking about anything else. Your own shameless efforts have been epic.
Click to expand...
You're an insane person.
 
buckshot24 said:
We don't need another thread, those who have stated that Trump said Muslim judges can't be objective in his cases are lying and that has happened in this thread. I didn't bring it up.
Click to expand...

It was off topic & you'll use any excuse to stay off topic.

You're an insane person.
Click to expand...

I wasn't crazy enough to reveal my bigotry to the world while running for president. Your hero obviously was & you're lame enough to be his advocate in spite of that.
 
buckshot24 said:
Well, it is obviously false to say Trump said that a Muslim simply couldn't be objective in a case involving him. Since one side won't admit that then it seems pretty obvious who is being objective about this.
Click to expand...
You're right. Trump didn't specifically say that. However, what Trump said about Hispanic judges certainly can be applied to Muslims. It would be like someone saying, "Dogs are biased against me, because they know I'm against things that have fur." And you saying, "he didn't say it about cats! Therefore, it's not true that his logic extends to cats."
 
The funny thing is if you'd just have admitted the lie this would have all been over a long time ago.

But think about this for a second, you think I am deliberately trying to steer the conversation away from a specific area. What the heck is that going to accomplish? Everybody is going to forget what Trump said about this judge? I'm not insane and I'm not stupid. That would be an epic waste of time.

What Trump said about Muslim judges is not what was conveyed in this thread. He didn't say a Muslim judge couldn't be fair to him, period.

The judge's heritage should have never been brought by Trump, I've said that from the beginning.
 
DrPizza said:
You're right. Trump didn't specifically say that. However, what Trump said about Hispanic judges certainly can be applied to Muslims. It would be like someone saying, "Dogs are biased against me, because they know I'm against things that have fur." And you saying, "he didn't say it about cats! Therefore, it's not true that his logic extends to cats."
Click to expand...
We have a statement about "cats", we don't need to conjecture over it. He said it was "possible" that a "cat" could be biased against him in response to a direct question.

And he didn't say all Hispanic judges are biased either.
 
Jhhnn said:
It was off topic & you'll use any excuse to stay off topic.



I wasn't crazy enough to reveal my bigotry to the world while running for president. Your hero obviously was & you're lame enough to be his advocate in spite of that.
Click to expand...


But isn't it odd that I think he is right and you guys doing all the name calling are wrong. Partisan blind. You have lost your minds because Trumbgazi. Jesus it's funny too.
 
buckshot24 said:
We have a statement about "cats", we don't need to conjecture over it. He said it was "possible" that a "cat" could be biased against him in response to a direct question.

And he didn't say all Hispanic judges are biased either.
Click to expand...
You're right. He didn't say all Hispanic judges would be biased against him. Just the ones that are are of Mexican heritage because he's building a wall, you know. A great big wall. It's going to be wonderful. It's going to be fantastic. And that's why a Hispanic would be biased against him.
 
Last edited:
DrPizza said:
You're right. He didn't say all Hispanic judges would be biased against him. Just the ones that are Hispanic because he's building a wall, you know. A great big wall. It's going to be wonderful. It's going to be fantastic. And that's why a Hispanic would be biased against him.
Click to expand...
Don't forget about the big beautiful door.

Seriously, he made comments about 1 judge and you're trying to extrapolate that into all Hispanic judges. Not justified.
 
buckshot24 said:
Don't forget about the big beautiful door.

Seriously, he made comments about 1 judge and you're trying to extrapolate that into all Hispanic judges. Not justified.
Click to expand...

One was entirely enough to let the bigotry show. He laid Curiel's supposed bias to the "fact" that Curiel is a Mexican. Because Wall, of course.
 
DrPizza said:
You're right. He didn't say all Hispanic judges would be biased against him. Just the ones that are are of Mexican heritage because he's building a wall, you know. A great big wall. It's going to be wonderful. It's going to be fantastic. And that's why a Hispanic would be biased against him.
Click to expand...

You jokers are funny. Not one of you would go into a black ghetto and tell people they could do better if they paid more attention to education. Trump would tell you openly what you might not so readily admit. People can be sensitize about certain issues and have certain biases and they can be easily stereotyped. What could be more scummy that to call somebody who points that out a racist. It's demonization which is what racism is.
 
I am going to bet that most low information Latino voters, God I hope that doesn't sound racist, will not be voting for trump. Why, heard he has it in for Mexicans. That is bias.. Republicans are freaking out, naturally, because Latino bias is going to kill them
 
Moonbeam said:
You jokers are funny. Not one of you would go into a black ghetto and tell people they could do better if they paid more attention to education. Trump would tell you openly what you might not so readily admit. People can be sensitize about certain issues and have certain biases and they can be easily stereotyped. What could be more scummy that to call somebody who points that out a racist. It's demonization which is what racism is.
Click to expand...

Racism is judging someone negatively based on their race, which Trump did pretty blatantly here and has done consistently throughout his campaign/life. He's said various derogatory things about Mexicans, and now fears retribution from someone of Mexican descent; which is something that many of his followers can relate to.

It's important for his supporters to explain this away because clear pandering to racists paints them negatively; they're well aware that it's socially unacceptable to be "racist".

To be clear, there's a spectrum of racism from somewhat insensitive, to Paula Dean, to the Klan. Most racists tend to draw the line somewhere above themselves, ie they're not racist because they're not Klan members; in the same way that Paula denies racism.
 
agent00f said:
Racism is judging someone negatively based on their race, which Trump did pretty blatantly here and has done consistently throughout his campaign/life. He's said various derogatory things about Mexicans, and now fears retribution from someone of Mexican descent; which is something that many of his followers can relate to.

It's important for his supporters to explain this away because clear pandering to racists paints them negatively; they're well aware that it's socially unacceptable to be "racist".

To be clear, there's a spectrum of racism from somewhat insensitive, to Paula Dean, to the Klan. Most racists tend to draw the line somewhere above themselves, ie they're not racist because they're not Klan members; in the same way that Paula denies racism.
Click to expand...

Welcome to Anandtech Forums.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top