dank69
Lifer
- Oct 6, 2009
- 35,421
- 28,863
- 136
Speaking of treating people differently:I didn't say that he should be treated differently.
Weird, right?
Speaking of treating people differently:I didn't say that he should be treated differently.
He didn't. He can't just say out loud, "I hereby declassify these documents"Probability is that he could just have declassified those docs... but because arrogant ignorant he didnt. Now the feds get a tip that there is classified docs in civilian circulation, what are they supposed to do?
It is if that person is looking for future leverage using state secrets or selling to the highest bidder.So I'm a little confused, there had been reports for at least a year now of people saying Trump was notorious for flushing important documents that could land him in trouble. Now I'm seeing info saying the FBI removed maybe 12 boxes worth of documents. Seems like a person who's prone to flush evidence wouldn't have 12 boxes of it in his house? This is all just speculation on my part though, as I've never known, or heard of a person who flushes important documents down the shitter. I didn't know such a thing existed, doesn't everyone use a paper shredder? Maybe the plumbing at MAL wasn't up to the task of handling the constant flushing of classified documents.
Trumpers who voted for him in 2016 and now claim they wouldn't again, still won't admit 2016 was a mistake.I really wonder what Taj's view on this issue would be. Every Republican supporter on these forums agree on one thing, but their explanation of their agreement is always different.
He didn't. He can't just say out loud, "I hereby declassify these documents"
There is a formal process that was not followed. Even if they were he still needs permission to take any documents from the White House per the Presidential Records Act.
Trumpers who voted for him in 2016 and now claim they wouldn't again, still won't admit 2016 was a mistake.
Of course I didn't mean me."But but but, I didn't know it said that when I signed that."
"Ignorance of the law is no excuse, particularly when it's a law because you decided to sign it into law." "Hand-cuff him and take him away."
Hypocrites say what?Speaking of treating people differently:
Weird, right?
You do know Trump has the warrant. If it were just personal notes don't you think he would have released a copy?
So, your beef is that traitors like Roger Stone may be inconvenienced? As for carrying firearm, someone correct me if I am wrong but federal agents are required to carry while on duty.
Which again means that you can't accurately judge the appropriate way to obtain those documents.And neither you nor I know what it says.....
Cops do that for regular people all the time - if anything we should be happy that Roger Stone didn't get special treatment.Watch the video I posted of the Stone arrest. Many agents going in with Assault rifles at the ready like they were going after an armed killer or a drug cartel member.
As I said Drama for the masses and silly.
Watch the video I posted of the Stone arrest. Many agents going in with Assault rifles at the ready like they were going after an armed killer or a drug cartel member.
As I said Drama for the masses and silly.
Cops do that for regular people all the time - if anything we should be happy that Roger Stone didn't get special treatment.
that would be the most useful thing they could do.
Damn, I wanted the Pubs to go into meltdown.Garland scheduled to speak at 2:30
Hey maybe Garland plans to announce the immediate arrest of the orange monkey 🤪Damn, I wanted the Pubs to go into meltdown.