• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Trump and team were on the menu at the correspondent dinner.

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
OEscKO3.png



President grab them by the pussy and his fans are upset now ?

D84iNSF.png


ZmhGVlh.gif
 
KMFJD said:
OEscKO3.png



President grab them by the pussy and his fans are upset now ?
Click to expand...

To be clear they said fuck YOUR feelings. They want you to be very concerned about THEIR feelings though.

Remember, conservatives have repeatedly tried to make the argument that they voted for an unstable, unqualified, incompetent racist because liberals said mean things to them.
 
Media needs to stop apologizing, pull a Trump and double down. Criticizing someone for pointing out actual events is intellectually dishonest.

It would be like the media apologizing for reporting on the story Trump lied about his inaugural crowd size.
 
Conservatives have won more Victim Card Championships than Tom Brady has won Super Bowls.
 
qliveur said:
All too easy:



Perhaps your argument is not as strong as you originally thought.

Fucking. Yuck.

Enjoying the usual circle-jerk, though.
Click to expand...

Speaking of circle jerks, you and Herr Trump should start a club for socially retarded males who still think they are in high school.

“Look at that face! Would anyone vote for that? Can you imagine that, the face of our next president?! I mean, she’s a woman, and I’m not supposed to say bad things, but really, folks, come on. Are we serious?”
 
soulcougher73 said:
Was pretty funny overall. Her delivery on a lot of jokes was bad though with the timing and pace of her voice.
Click to expand...
Yeah, she definitely screwed up some of her jokes and laughed a bit too much at her own, similar to how I have difficulty watching Trevor Noah on the Daily Show now because he giggles at himself too much. Also, I have to say, I really find Wolf's voice annoying.
That being said Sarah Huckabee Sanders deserved every joke fired her way because she is one ugly fucking woman, and that comment has nothing to do with her looks.
 
qliveur said:
No excess bags other than the ones under her eyes.
Click to expand...
So, bags under her eyes which anyone can have especially from the stress of preparing for a big tv appearance. No excessive bags and she still has her teeth. She's sounding less and less like your bag lady what with all the specifications/clarifications you've had to make to fit her in to your description of a bag lady. Wanna cut your losses and just admit you were making a poorly thought out joke just to be a prick?

*Interesting note: Wolfe's jokes were well thought out.
 
The WH Correspondents dinner is not really a roast, it is traditionally a time of good natured, bipartisan ribbing and a celebration of the role of the Free Press. People going to a roast know what to expect and have a chance to respond. There was nothing good-natured about Michelle Wolf's material. More future presidents will skip this event as long as they're these Hollywood starfecking type shitshows.

And the Republican reaction...what I’m taking away from this WHCD episode is that it is only okay to call people liars, insult their appearances, and criticize their characters if you do it from the safety of Twitter.
 
qliveur said:
Don't let reality stop them from white-knighting for their unfunny crack-baby "comedienne."
Click to expand...
You are such an imbecile. Shouldn't you be setting an example of the correct way to talk about a person while in the midst of scolding someone for doing so in what you deem an unacceptable way? Is that concept too difficult for you to comprehend?

Of course it is.
 
boomerang said:
No surprise but you're very confused. Roast... um, no it's not.

The president of the White House Correspondents' Association has apologized for Michelle Wolf's 'divisive' monologue.

Margaret Talev full statement on controversial WHCA dinner
Dear Members:

I want to tell you how much your kind words meant to me following my personal remarks at last night's White House Correspondents' Dinner about the roots of my belief in journalism's essential role.

I have also heard from members expressing dismay with the entertainer's monologue and concerns about how it reflects on our mission. Oliver Knox, who will take over this summer as our president, and I, recognize these concerns and are committed to hearing from members on your views on the format of the dinner going forward. Last night's program was meant to offer a unifying message about our common commitment to a vigorous and free press while honoring civility, great reporting and scholarship winners, not to divide people. Unfortunately, the entertainer's monologue was not in the spirit of the mission.

Every day we are working hard to advocate for our members and ensure coverage that benefits the public, and the dinner is an important opportunity to highlight and maintain our essential work. The White House Correspondents' Association remains dedicated to that mission.

Margaret Talev
Click to expand...
She shouldn't have done that.
 
VRAMdemon said:
The WH Correspondents dinner is not really a roast, it is traditionally a time of good natured, bipartisan ribbing and a celebration of the role of the Free Press. People going to a roast know what to expect and have a chance to respond. There was nothing good-natured about Michelle Wolf's material. More future presidents will skip this event as long as they're these Hollywood starfecking type shitshows.
Click to expand...

We celebrate the role of the free press by having an expensive dinner for members of that press to rub elbows with the powerful people they're supposed to be holding to account? The only way to improve on what Michelle Wolf did on Saturday would be to have the MC ridicule the event itself and everyone participating as much Wolf did to the administration and the press secretary.

And the Republican reaction...what I’m taking away from this WHCD episode is that it is only okay to call people liars, insult their appearances, and criticize their characters if you do it from the safety of Twitter.
Click to expand...

Yeah, they're a bunch of pathetic snowflakes, but what else is new.
 
VRAMdemon said:
The WH Correspondents dinner is not really a roast, it is traditionally a time of good natured, bipartisan ribbing and a celebration of the role of the Free Press. People going to a roast know what to expect and have a chance to respond. There was nothing good-natured about Michelle Wolf's material. More future presidents will skip this event as long as they're these Hollywood starfecking type shitshows.

And the Republican reaction...what I’m taking away from this WHCD episode is that it is only okay to call people liars, insult their appearances, and criticize their characters if you do it from the safety of Twitter.
Click to expand...
If that's your take away, you're kind of simple.
 
Blackjack200 said:
It was an absolutely certainty that she would. The WHCA is a craven, pathetic organization that assumes a position of total submission for the executive branch.
Click to expand...
Well, access is important so I guess I get it but I would have preferred if the organization had opted to get Wolfe's back 100%.
 
Holy shit, I did not know how good this speech was top to bottom.

We've got our friends at CNN here. Welcome, guys, it's great to have you. You guys love breaking news, and you did it. You broke it. Good work.

The most useful information on CNN is when Anthony Bourdain tells me where to eat noodles.

LMAO. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...e-white-house-correspondents-dinner-annotated

Younigue said:
Well, access is important so I guess I get it but I would have preferred if the organization had opted to get Wolfe's back 100%.
Click to expand...

"Access Journalism" isn't journalism at all.
 
Blackjack200 said:
Holy shit, I did not know how good this speech was top to bottom.

We've got our friends at CNN here. Welcome, guys, it's great to have you. You guys love breaking news, and you did it. You broke it. Good work.

The most useful information on CNN is when Anthony Bourdain tells me where to eat noodles.

LMAO. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...e-white-house-correspondents-dinner-annotated



"Access Journalism" isn't journalism at all.
Click to expand...
If it were access journalism alone I'd agree but I have more faith in the bulk of mainstream news media than that. I think the majority of them work hard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top