Trump and House Republicans trying to kill deal underway on the border.

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,773
8,348
136
This is definitely amusing to watch.

House GQP needs something to run on in November just as much (if not more so) as Trump does. They've done NOTHING for the entire congress. So they need "OMG the boarder!!!!!" issue to instill fear and scream about during their klan, er, I mean campaign rallies. Otherwise, they're going to get smoked even more than is already in the cards.

If they actually do the things their corrupt benefactors really want them to do it'll expose how they are totally in the pockets of their oligarch power brokers that are looking for ways to legitimize their efforts at seizing the nation and creating a plutocracy directly rather than indirectly as they do now. The Republican party is nothing but a front, a hoax showcase window dressing that their actual unelected bosses operate their shadow gov't through. And they've got an army of millions of dupes keeping them in the business of influencing gov't policy in their favor. What a racket that is.
 

Franz316

Golden Member
Sep 12, 2000
1,024
543
136
The GQP is constantly finds ways to hit rock bottom. Their only natural behavior is to resist and obstruct. They are literally incapable of governing or making a bold decision that benefits more than their political goals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dank69

gothuevos

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2010
3,439
2,397
136
The GQP is constantly finds ways to hit rock bottom. Their only natural behavior is to resist and obstruct. They are literally incapable of governing or making a bold decision that benefits more than their political goals.
No, this is what their voters want.
 

emperus

Diamond Member
Apr 6, 2012
7,824
1,583
136
Can y'all explain this madness? Can't say I'm will versed enough in senate procedure to make sense of this

McConnell asked Lankford to negotiate this bill. In the Senate they need 60 votes(cloture) in order to move most bills forward. The cloture would effectively end any filibuster. So McConnell is basically asking Senators to not vote for cloture on a bill he asked one of his members to negotiate and he publically supported earlier that morning. Or basically filibuster the bill. So the bill will not come up for a vote.
And because McConnel is asking everyone not to vote for cloture, Lankford who wrote the bill may not even vote for cloture or for the Bill to be able to voted on. Nutty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iRONic

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,282
32,777
136
Timeline to date

Trump 2018 says he needs an Immigration Reform bill. Doesn't get it done. Does not close the border
Biden 2021 Submits a Bill Jan 21 for Immigration reform. Says it is needed.
Republicans May 2023 HR-2. Build wall asylum changes, e-verify requirements and more border agents
Dec 2023 Republican insist Israel, Ukraine and border be combined. Senate negotiates.
Jan 2024 Trump starts calling the House to reject bill. Trump also says he wants the border to fail to help him
Jan 2024 Speaker of the House and Trump start trashing the bill BEFORE they read it.
Feb 2024 Senate releases bill. Republicans start lying about it's contents. Mitch McConnell who helped craft the bill now tells member they can vote against it. Republicans NOW say a bill isn't needed.

How did we get here???
 
Last edited:

gothuevos

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2010
3,439
2,397
136
Sadly I think dems have scored 5 own goals here.

Yup, this is where you wish Biden had had some foresight into this. Why remove the Remain in Mexico policy to give your opponents more ammo against you? And then you promote "bipartisan " legislation that may not have been even been necessary if the prior law had not been revoked in the first place. Silly run around games.

For once it would be nice to see the Dems try to proactively take away GOP talking points before letting it turn into a potential issue.
 
Dec 10, 2005
28,609
13,703
136
Yup, this is where you wish Biden had had some foresight into this. Why remove the Remain in Mexico policy to give your opponents more ammo against you? And then you promote "bipartisan " legislation that may not have been even been necessary if the prior law had not been revoked in the first place. Silly run around games.

For once it would be nice to see the Dems try to proactively take away GOP talking points before letting it turn into a potential issue.
Remain in Mexico wasn't a law, it was an executive policy, and a fairly bad one at that.

Biden could now get points for trying to work in a bipartisan fashion, which idiots in this country really love, and Republicans get to be blamed for sinking the bill.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,282
32,777
136
Yup, this is where you wish Biden had had some foresight into this. Why remove the Remain in Mexico policy to give your opponents more ammo against you? And then you promote "bipartisan " legislation that may not have been even been necessary if the prior law had not been revoked in the first place. Silly run around games.

For once it would be nice to see the Dems try to proactively take away GOP talking points before letting it turn into a potential issue.
Remain in Mexico was started and stopped by Biden because it was tied up in the courts.

The new law would settle this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dave_5k

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,595
46,244
136
Remain in Mexico wasn't a law, it was an executive policy, and a fairly bad one at that.

Biden could now get points for trying to work in a bipartisan fashion, which idiots in this country really love, and Republicans get to be blamed for sinking the bill.

Mexico also has to agree to re-implement it and has thus far refused to consider doing so.
 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
15,952
11,103
136
How that?
By trying to be nice and respectful of the GOP's demands.

It's beyond time to appoint more scotus judges and ram our agenda through and make sure every republican loses by default!
Remain in Mexico wasn't a law, it was an executive policy, and a fairly bad one at that.

Biden could now get points for trying to work in a bipartisan fashion, which idiots in this country really love, and Republicans get to be blamed for sinking the bill.
You expect too much ability to reason from the idiots!

Biden gets the blame no matter what because Trump is the hero!
 
  • Like
Reactions: cytg111
Dec 10, 2005
28,609
13,703
136
By trying to be nice and respectful of the GOP's demands.

It's beyond time to appoint more scotus judges and ram our agenda through and make sure every republican loses by default!
Add more justices how? Last time I checked, that justice number is set by statute, so good luck passing a law at the current juncture. It's also very much an idea that you would want to make sure you could get passed, lest you burn all your political capital in a futile effort.


You expect too much ability to reason from the idiots!

Biden gets the blame no matter what because Trump is the hero!
Why is Biden going to get the blame here? The bill was basically reported as a bipartisan bill that had a laundry list of GOP-approved provisions, which then the GOP in the House said "no" to and sunk it.

Seems like you just want to wishcast/doomcast.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,119
15,562
136
Well even Fox is like : Are you guys real?

So, it might just tank the gop. Question might become how much are they gonna take with em down..