The Blue Wall is on life support after hillary can't even put away a hunched over old man. It's utterly pathetic that the DNC and hillary can't get him to concede by now, let alone still losing states to him.This just in:
National polls mean shit for the General Election.
Protip: The electoral college decides the Presidency.
The Blue Wall is alive and well.
Carry on.
The Blue Wall is on life support after hillary can't even put away a hunched over old man. It's utterly pathetic that the DNC and hillary can't get him to concede by now, let alone still losing states to him.
The Blue Wall is on life support after hillary can't even put away a hunched over old man. It's utterly pathetic that the DNC and hillary can't get him to concede by now, let alone still losing states to him.
The Blue Wall is on life support after hillary can't even put away a hunched over old man. It's utterly pathetic that the DNC and hillary can't get him to concede by now, let alone still losing states to him.
The Blue Wall is on life support after hillary can't even put away a hunched over old man. It's utterly pathetic that the DNC and hillary can't get him to concede by now, let alone still losing states to him.
The "anti trump crowd" is a huge minority if you're talking about Republicans. Look at the how the voting went, did we see any "anti Trump" in the Acela Corridor states or Indiana? No, because it's a very small percentage.
You don't get it. Hillary & Bernie are on the same side of the blue wall.
I don't think that Sen Sanders and his minions are buying that. If it were so, then Sanders would have suspended his campaign by now. I guess there is more than one wall. Clinton's dissing them several times in the last week, isn't going to bring her as many votes as she will need.
When Clinton says that in 2008, she says withdrew and didn't ask [demand] anything from Obama. What a bald faced lie. How else did she get to be Secretary of State?
44.2% of Republican primary voters in Indiana voted against Trump. The problem is, we have no idea how many of them hate him and would refuse to vote for him in the generals. Could be none of them, could be all of them - and that would hardly be a very small percentage.
The Blue Wall is on life support after hillary can't even put away a hunched over old man. It's utterly pathetic that the DNC and hillary can't get him to concede by now, let alone still losing states to him.
lol Democrats - when we do evil stupid things, it's the Republicans' fault.Pappy Bush was the one who set up NAFTA to begin with, the original idea for it was Saint Reagan.
I agree that Bernie is probably a stronger candidate, but maybe not. Clinton is certainly stronger in the states the Pubbies will win, which probably carries over to independents there, and may also be stronger in some swing states.Agree, check out my other thread where Huffpo and Salon authors attack Clinton in separate op eds today.
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2472063
Bernie is simply a stronger candidate and without a looming FBI investigation that can royally screw things up down the road for Democrats.
So if you flipped the 520 superdelegates to bernie's side, who would be winning? We can do math. Sanders would be winning by 200~ with the supers' support that hillary has.Can't put him away? She is absolutely dominating him, to a considerably greater extent than President Obama was beating her at this point in the process. http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/a-sanders-comeback-would-be-unprecedented/ I personally have no issue with Sanders staying in the race, both as a gesture of solidarity with his supporters and a way of influencing the Clinton campaign to move toward his position on the issues. He certainly is not doing it because he thinks he can win - he can't.
I don't think that Sen Sanders and his minions are buying that. If it were so, then Sanders would have suspended his campaign by now. I guess there is more than one wall. Clinton's dissing them several times in the last week, isn't going to bring her as many votes as she will need.
When Clinton says that in 2008, she says withdrew and didn't ask [demand] anything from Obama. What a bald faced lie. How else did she get to be Secretary of State?
If I were Trump, this would be my plan of attack....
I'd blame Bill's sexual transgressions on Hillary.
Especially his blatantly lying on TV to millions, denying Monica ever happened.
Except, for that "dress". DNA spots and all.
Damn that dress... (said Bill to Hillary).
I would link together their ability and easy at lying as typical of the Clintons.
Birds of a feather, if you get my drift.
The Bonnie and Clyde of American politics.
Then as candidate Donald Trump, I would bring up the mysterious death of their friend Vince Foster.
If Trump can suggest the father of Ted Cruz had a hand in the assignation of JFK, Trump could easily suggest the Clintons had Vince Foster knocked off because Foster was about to jump ship and spill the poop on the Clintons.
Remember, it had been suggested, back then, that Vince Foster was bisexual and had boyfriends.
And that park where Vince Foster was found dead in was considered a gathering place for gays and quick sex.
So Trump could suggest Vince Foster was lured to the park for a sexual lunch-time quickie, and the Clintons hired an assassin waiting in the park for Vince to show up.
A murder for hire by the Clintons, made to appear as a suicide.
Simply to avoid any risk to Bill's candidacy, plus to keep Vince Foster quiet.
And back to Monica Lewinsky.
Remember, back then BEFORE the dress, Bill Clinton emphatically denied he had anything to do with Monica Lewinsky.
And if people remember back then, the insinuation had just begun suggesting Monica Lewinsky was a nut job, infatuated with a president, Lewinsky had made up the entire affair because Monica Lewinsky was delusional. Sick. A love crazed female.
THAT was where this was heading, back then, before "the dress".
If that dress had never come to light, who really knows how far the Clintons would have gone to silence Monica Lewinsky?
If that dress had never come to light, Monica Lewinsky could have easily been found in some hotel room, dead from a self inflected gun shot or from an overdose, along with a suicide note. A suicide note not written by Lewinsky, but appearing to be.
All faked and orchestrated by... BILL and HILLARY CLINTON.
That could have all happened, if.... that dress had not existed.
For sure...
Trump has plenty of low down dirty laundry to stir up concerning the Clintons.
And we all know that for Donald, this would be easy to do.
Because as Donald would say, birds of a feather flock together.
Bill lies. Hillary lies. They are as one.
And who only knows the evil Bill and Hillary Inc. have gotten away with?
I mean, if someone like Bill Clinton could and would lie to the face of millions of Americans without ever once flinching, could the Clintons orchestrate a murder?
Would Monica Lewinsky have died from an apparent suicide?
Could Vince Foster have been murdered?
Donald, there you go.
Expect a bill for my services.![]()
Bill Clinton isn't running for President - Hilary is. Trump is guilty of the same dirt that Bill is. All Hilary has to do is remind people that she's not Bill. She's not the one guilty of philandering. Trump on the other hand, is on record on the Howard Stern show bragging about cheating, bragging about the Venereal Disease problem he had.
He would have to be a special sort of stupid to attack Bill for something that he is just as guilty of.
So if you flipped the 520 superdelegates to bernie's side, who would be winning? We can do math. Sanders would be winning by 200~ with the supers' support that hillary has.
Pledged delegates 1,682 1,361
Superdelegates 520 39
It's rigged.
Plus that article was written before Indiana which hillary was supposed to win, and it acknowledges that sample size is a problem and the fact that hillary's unfavorability rating is close to an all time high.
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/hillary-clinton-favorable-rating
So if you flipped the 520 superdelegates to bernie's side, who would be winning? We can do math. Sanders would be winning by 200~ with the supers' support that hillary has.
Pledged delegates 1,682 1,361
Superdelegates 520 39
It's rigged.
Plus that article was written before Indiana which hillary was supposed to win, and it acknowledges that sample size is a problem and the fact that hillary's unfavorability rating is close to an all time high.
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/hillary-clinton-favorable-rating
lol Democrats - when we do evil stupid things, it's the Republicans' fault.
It's this bizarre coincidence that happens over and over and over. Evil stupid things that happen when Democrats are in charge are always really done by Republicans. This happens continually. It's quite the phenomenon.lol Democrats - when we do evil stupid things, it's the Republicans' fault.