Transcript edited or in it`s entirety?

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,554
10,234
136
So you are telling me the Nancy did read and have access to the whistle blower complaint and the memo of the phone call to the Ukraine? What rational leader would declare action based on unknown information unless they are really just a figure head? Can't wait for you to counter facts with the truth.

Opening the impeachment inquiry was a response to obstruction, preventing acting DNI from bringing the complaint to Congress. Releasing the “transcript” and complaint after the fact doesn’t stop it once the ball gets rolling.

And like GOP Sen Kennedy said yesterday, not much has changed—still running 6 committee investigations.
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,365
1,223
126
No I’m calling you an NPC
You can call me whatever helps you be less triggered. The facts are very clear about what was and wasn't said to the Ukrainian President. You can ramble on about mafia boss code words and campaign finance violations but those are not the facts. You really should stop because every one knows that the impeachment inquiry is nonsense and based on politics. The Progressheviks want power and Trump has it.
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,365
1,223
126
Opening the impeachment inquiry was a response to obstruction, preventing acting DNI from bringing the complaint to Congress. Releasing the “transcript” and complaint after the fact doesn’t stop it once the ball gets rolling.

And like GOP Sen Kennedy said yesterday, not much has changed—still running 6 committee investigations.
You can't be a whistle blower because you claim a third party told you some information and some opinion pieces were published online. They can run a zillion investigations but each one turns up more evidence of Democrats working with or soliciting foreign governments in helping against Trump.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,554
10,234
136
You can't be a whistle blower because you claim a third party told you some information and some opinion pieces were published online. They can run a zillion investigations but each one turns up more evidence of Democrats working with or soliciting foreign governments in helping against Trump.

Who amongst these principals interacting with Ukraine is the secret Deep State Democrat??

- Giuliani?
- Pompeo?
- PENCE??
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,403
136
You can call me whatever helps you be less triggered. The facts are very clear about what was and wasn't said to the Ukrainian President. You can ramble on about mafia boss code words and campaign finance violations but those are not the facts. You really should stop because every one knows that the impeachment inquiry is nonsense and based on politics. The Progressheviks want power and Trump has it.

Haha triggered followed by a wall of text. I’ll summarize your wall of text


Whaaaa
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Since she is proceeding with the pre-impeachment inquiry based on the Ukraine stuff without have read the "evidence", it does seem like Nancy is no longer in charge.

It's perfectly clear that Trump solicited information from a foreign govt to support his political campaign, a "thing of value". That is specifically prohibited by statute. He also directed that a whistleblower complaint be hidden from congress, also prohibited by statute.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,403
136
It's perfectly clear that Trump solicited information from a foreign govt to support his political campaign, a "thing of value". That is specifically prohibited by statute. He also directed that a whistleblower complaint be hidden from congress, also prohibited by statute.

Careful you are violating Brandon’s safe space
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,365
1,223
126
It's perfectly clear that Trump solicited information from a foreign govt to support his political campaign, a "thing of value". That is specifically prohibited by statute. He also directed that a whistleblower complaint be hidden from congress, also prohibited by statute.
What campaign? So he asked the Ukrainian President for information to help his reelection campaign?
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,365
1,223
126
It is an absolute joke that you morons are going with the "getting help from a foreign government to help my campaign" angle. That has to be a joke.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,076
2,635
136
Also, NYT is saying the IC IG concluded that what Trump did amounted to soliciting an illegal campaign donation.

That’s the conclusion Barr replaced with his own analysis and withheld from Congress. Barr is an accessory to the crime.
This is a major point. A campaign donation isn't just money. The law actually states that a donation can be a thing of value which includes actions and services. The DOJ itself has a guideline statement which explains that actions or services that would take the effort and time of individuals (even if they are working for free it's at a cost to them) is a thing of value and if a campaign elicits it from a foreign government that is a crime. Asking someone to investigate something is a thing of value even if they are doing it allegedly for free. It's not free to them when you can easily put a monetary value on their time and efforts and expenses to do said investigation. If someone donates free blowjobs to a campaign that's is a freaking campaign finance violation. It's no different if they are donating a free investigation.
 

JTsyo

Lifer
Nov 18, 2007
12,031
1,131
126
Well that's about 2 percent of all articles I would expect.
Yea where's obstruction for firing Comey that he confessed on national TV was going to be done even without the recommendation of the DOJ. It was clear he was trying to obstruct the election investigation.
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,365
1,223
126
Yea where's obstruction for firing Comey that he confessed on national TV was going to be done even without the recommendation of the DOJ. It was clear he was trying to obstruct the election investigation.
Mueller and his report answered those questions. Sorry that you were sold a bill of goods about obstruction that wasn't true.
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,365
1,223
126
It's not a joke-

What election? 2016 is over and we know that Clinton and the DNC got information from the Russians. So now that Biden is attempting to become the DNC's nominee for the 2020 election, his son is immune from being investigated by a foreign government? Trump didn't ask the Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden because that was started years ago.
 

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,359
4,640
136
Mueller and his report answered those questions. Sorry that you were sold a bill of goods about obstruction that wasn't true.

You really don't know what you are talking about. Dispite being shown, and linked, to Mueller himself saying the exact opposite. You, I have notices, have no evidence of what you say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheVrolok
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,403
136
What election? 2016 is over and we know that Clinton and the DNC got information from the Russians. So now that Biden is attempting to become the DNC's nominee for the 2020 election, his son is immune from being investigated by a foreign government? Trump didn't ask the Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden because that was started years ago.

Bidens Son was never fucking investigated. Never.
The company he worked for was but no charges were made.
The Ukraine’s Government said Bidens Son was never under investigation.
What is so hard to understand about that.
 

snoopy7548

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2005
8,254
5,330
146
What election? 2016 is over and we know that Clinton and the DNC got information from the Russians. So now that Biden is attempting to become the DNC's nominee for the 2020 election, his son is immune from being investigated by a foreign government? Trump didn't ask the Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden because that was started years ago.

Maybe you should be more concerned about Trump than you are about Barbie dolls. :confused: