• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Tracking 64-layer SSDs

Bouowmx

Golden Member
Eventually, SSDs will become cheap, 1 TB/200 USD and under, one day.... Hopefully, 64-layer flash will take the market to that point.

So far, Intel SSD 545s has been released, in 512 GB and 2.5-in: Newegg

In the works are siblings Western Digital Blue 3D (Newegg) and SanDisk Ultra 3D (B&H), and Toshiba TR200 (AnandTech).

An alternative route to maximize capacity-to-price is Crucial BX300 (Tom's Hardware), a lower-cost implementation of the current MX300?


Thank you to members who contribute to this thread in the future.
 
Funny you mention the 1TB for $200 and under price point.

At one point, when NAND was getting cheaper and not more expensive, you could get Mushkin Reactor MLC 1TB SSDs for as low as $205 or $210 or so, on sale, at Newegg and Newegg on ebay.

Sad that this is now just a memory, and that we hope to reach that price-point again, with SSDs with even more dense geometries of NAND.
 
An alternative route to maximize capacity-to-price is Crucial BX300 (Tom's Hardware), a lower-cost implementation of the current MX300?

According to what I've read (and as it says in the link you included) the BX300 will likely use a DRAMless Silicon Motion controller.
So it's more like what the BX100 was to the MX100 (a budget unit using a Silicon Motion controller instead of a Marvell controller and using NAND binned a bit lower).
Don't know if it does use lower quality NAND than the MX300 (or others with the same NAND) (like the BX100) but if it is using a DRAMless controller it may not perform as well as the BX100.
 
Well, QLC NAND will make things cheaper...at least for the OEM.
If they will pass the cost savings onto us, no idea, and in this case, I am not so sure I would want to use a QLC device, until it has been proven to be solid.
 
Back
Top