- Aug 14, 2000
Interesting.The target is at least 50% higher performance than GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, and our sources are saying theyre now bound by the CPU. Even Core i7-6950X isnt enough to feed all the cards and in a lot of scenarios you could see an Intel Core i7-6700K, with its supreme clock (4.0 vs. 3.0 GHz) easily feed the GP100 more efficiently than Broadwell-E based Core i7 Extreme Edition. The running joke inside Nvidia is dont buy the 6950X buy 6700K and a Titan but were not sure that Nvidia will use this for an official tagline. Truth to be told, they might be right we need Intel to return to the 4-core next-gen mainstream/enthusiast and then X-core big-daddy part using the same architecture, rather than the current cadence which makes sense only if youre working for Intel. AMDs 8-core ZEN cannot come soon enough.
If all things go well, Nvidia should unveil GeForce GTX Titan P on Gamescom in Cologne, Germany August 17-21, 2016.
There's a 0% chance that Titan P is GP100 if it's coming out this fast, as GP100 won't be anywhere close to market saturation for the HPC (Tesla) and Workstation (Quadro) markets by that time.GP102 in-between Titan P & 1080? Not much room there to slot in. If GP102 exists, with low FP64, it will be outright faster than Titan P.
That's what makes more sense. If GP102 exists, it should be launched for consumers while HBM2 GP100 goes to expensive Teslas & then Quadros.There's a 0% chance that Titan P is GP100 if it's coming out this fast, as GP100 won't be anywhere close to market saturation for the HPC (Tesla) and Workstation (Quadro) markets by that time.
It would be completely illogical for them to do that.
It's either GP102 or it's not actually coming out that soon.
but it also has ~50% more shaders. I guess they could make a 430-450mm GP102 with around the same amount of shaders. The other thing agsint GP100 selling as a GPU is it has a lot of wasted die space with all the PCI-E interfaces.I think the titan will be gp102.
gp100 has the half and double precision features, but that's not going to help much in games.
Yes, I assume gp102 will be a 1080 +50%, like they did with maxwell.but it also has ~50% more shaders. I guess they could make a 430-450mm GP102 with around the same amount of shaders. The other thing agsint GP100 selling as a GPU is it has a lot of wasted die space with all the PCI-E interfaces.
Ten cards worldwideDoubt it will actually launch.
I'm expecting to see Jen-Hsun Huang up there with a HBM2 filled board asking the crowd "did we not promise you the power of ten?" and proceeding to drop a $10,000 price tag, The Price is Right style. Confetti everywhere. No way the card launches Q3, maybe Q4.
This has been gone over more that a few times, but so would I. The only way it would make sense to launch a GP100 based Titan before the PCIe based Tesla cards is if they have a large number of dies that can't even make P100 spec, and its a further cut part. 12GB, 3328CC (or 3200), and 1/4 or 1/3 DP performance.If Titan P is based on GP100, I would be stunned.
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|Question Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs 6GB, 2021 Revisit.||Graphics Cards||43|
|K||Discussion AMD FSR vs Nvidia DLSS2.0 vs Temporal Super Resolution (TSR)||Graphics Cards||36|
|OT: SYCL will replace CUDA||Graphics Cards||7|
|Question intel plus nVIdia?||Graphics Cards||13|
|Question Most Recent Nvidia/Geforce Drivers not showing FPS in game?||Graphics Cards||2|