Originally posted by: RichUK
Tom's hardware is flawed big time these days
Originally posted by: sandorski
eek, also note that the AMD systems used less power under Full Load than the Intel systems used while Idle.
Originally posted by: RichUK
Tom's hardware is flawed big time these days
Originally posted by: RichUK
Originally posted by: RichUK
Tom's hardware is flawed big time these days
Hmm i might be wrong on this account, the review does not see to be that bad, i mean its not an Intel Fanboing review.. its actually quite equal ish ..
Originally posted by: RichUK
Hah check this Link .. Prime 95 takes up 50% of CPU speed in task manager (its only testing one core) ...
what are we going to do now when trying to test fora stable OC on the X2's ... ofcourse i never thought of that (of course the app is single thresded) .. maybe prime might release a dual core multi threaded solution .. who knows
Here's the bottom line. If we had to recommend a single core processor, the choice would depend greatly on the type of applications in use. But in the dual core arena, though, there is not much that speaks for Intel: go with the Athlon 64 X2.
Originally posted by: bradley
Buy two Pentium D Processors, get one power generator FREE!
Originally posted by: sandorski
eek, also note that the AMD systems used less power under Full Load than the Intel systems used while Idle.
Originally posted by: n7
This review must been painful for Tommy Boy.
Here's the bottom line. If we had to recommend a single core processor, the choice would depend greatly on the type of applications in use. But in the dual core arena, though, there is not much that speaks for Intel: go with the Athlon 64 X2.
Best thing i've ever seen said at Tom's![]()
