• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Tom's Hardware in AMD's Pocket

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: DrMrLordX
The OP obviously does not recall the THG article in which they pimp an overclocked 805 with watercooling as a good budget overclock.

urk.

That kind of ignores the higher cost motherboard, RAM, and cooling needed to do it. Even worse is that they put overclocked Intel processors in their price/performance tables against stock AMD processors.
 
Originally posted by: BladeVenom
Originally posted by: DrMrLordX
The OP obviously does not recall the THG article in which they pimp an overclocked 805 with watercooling as a good budget overclock.

urk.

That kind of ignores the higher cost motherboard, RAM, and cooling needed to do it. Even worse is that they put overclocked Intel processors in their price/performance tables against stock AMD processors.
That's only because they're so biased toward AMD.:Q
 
Originally posted by: Zim
Originally posted by: Pale RiderYou read into things too much.

As an writer you generally give the "good news" first in any article reguardless of the topic.
That isn't an article about AMD... or Intel. It's a chart of relative performances of common CPUs. I find it strange that they choose about the only test where an AMD chip comes out top to display by default. It's not even as if it's the first test in the list.

I have never thought THG was biased towards Intel, at least not in recent years. AMD have been courting them and allowing them into their research labs etc., and no doubt giving them lots of nice goodies and treatment. Their bias is most obvious in their "AMD/Intel Shoot-Outs" where their conclusions often completely contradict their own test results.

I don't see any links in this thread.
 
Back
Top