Tommy Robinson Arrested For Filming Child Grooming Gang

[sdifox]

When harvey weinstein turned himself in there was loads of media present, same thing with Bill Cosby media all at the courthouse. Many other trials the media is there reporting sometimes even trying to get pictures or video of the accused. They never affected the trial so how does Tommy Robinson affect the trial?

This isnt about him filming and reporting, this is about him being politically targeted by the government and corrupt justice system because he brought the issue of grooming gangs to the public who had no idea what was going on. This is political payback for daring to speak out against the system.

Except this is in UK, not America. You know, on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean?

And violating parole conditions is go to jail directly on both sides of the pond.

Like I said, you are just freedumb

 

[Darwin333]

When harvey weinstein turned himself in there was loads of media present, same thing with Bill Cosby media all at the courthouse. Many other trials the media is there reporting sometimes even trying to get pictures or video of the accused. They never affected the trial so how does Tommy Robinson affect the trial?

This isnt about him filming and reporting, this is about him being politically targeted by the government and corrupt justice system because he brought the issue of grooming gangs to the public who had no idea what was going on. This is political payback for daring to speak out against the system.

You do realize that we are talking about a different country, right? And different countries have different laws?

So while you give some American examples that aren't considered "jury tampering" or whatever the British term is for it, that has nothing to do with UK law.

 

[Jhhnn]

When harvey weinstein turned himself in there was loads of media present, same thing with Bill Cosby media all at the courthouse. Many other trials the media is there reporting sometimes even trying to get pictures or video of the accused. They never affected the trial so how does Tommy Robinson affect the trial?

This isnt about him filming and reporting, this is about him being politically targeted by the government and corrupt justice system because he brought the issue of grooming gangs to the public who had no idea what was going on. This is political payback for daring to speak out against the system.

It seems highly unlikely that the Brits changed the rules for Tommy Robinson.

 

[zinfamous]

STFU You son of a bitch. I am not a fascist and Tommy Robinson isnt a nazi but you are though. Its only because people like him exposed the pedophiles that they're going to court. they weren't being arrested for a long time because of the police and politicians were afraid it would the community.

Heres a video of a Sikh man defending Tommy Robinson, Is he a fascist? No, Now STFU you neo-nazi motherfucker.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGRqhVLuqEw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qITyUwl8LxU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMSKIo9FcHY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWe33oCmzO0

lol. "I'm rubber you're glue"?

Are you fucking 8, you useless slime mold?

 

[zinfamous]

When harvey weinstein turned himself in there was loads of media present, same thing with Bill Cosby media all at the courthouse. Many other trials the media is there reporting sometimes even trying to get pictures or video of the accused. They never affected the trial so how does Tommy Robinson affect the trial?

This isnt about him filming and reporting, this is about him being politically targeted by the government and corrupt justice system because he brought the issue of grooming gangs to the public who had no idea what was going on. This is political payback for daring to speak out against the system.

He's a nazi that is helping pedophiles with his actions, and you support him.

Because you are a nazi.

......and possibly a pedophile? wtf, man. D:

 

[Veliko]

When harvey weinstein turned himself in there was loads of media present, same thing with Bill Cosby media all at the courthouse. Many other trials the media is there reporting sometimes even trying to get pictures or video of the accused. They never affected the trial so how does Tommy Robinson affect the trial?

This isnt about him filming and reporting, this is about him being politically targeted by the government and corrupt justice system because he brought the issue of grooming gangs to the public who had no idea what was going on. This is political payback for daring to speak out against the system.

Oh look, it's another Tommy Robinson fan who doesn't know what he's talking about.

 

[pmv]

When harvey weinstein turned himself in there was loads of media present, same thing with Bill Cosby media all at the courthouse. Many other trials the media is there reporting sometimes even trying to get pictures or video of the accused. They never affected the trial so how does Tommy Robinson affect the trial?

This isnt about him filming and reporting, this is about him being politically targeted by the government and corrupt justice system because he brought the issue of grooming gangs to the public who had no idea what was going on. This is political payback for daring to speak out against the system.

You miss the point (probably deliberately) that the restrictions on this trial were specific to this trial, and existed because it was directly related to other trials with other defendants. That does not seem to be the case with Weinstien.

Also, apparently the Cosby jury is sequestered. That's something the UK doesn't do, and it seems to me it's a sort of inverse of what UK law does, but to the same ends. Sequestration (or is it sequestering?) restricts the jurors in what they can read or speak to, the UK restricts the media in what they can say to everyone about this one specific thing. Strong restrictions on a small group of people (the jury can't really hear about anything) vs limited restrictions on a large group (the public can't hear about this one specific trial). You also seem to go in more for jury-vetting, which seems a related issue, insofar as it often seems to be about excluding jurors who had already decided their opinion based on the media.

Regardless of the rights-and-wrongs of the law, it seems clear Robinson was subject to exactly the same law as everyone else, and he chose to get himself into this situation.

 

[Incorruptible]

You do realize that we are talking about a different country, right? And different countries have different laws?

So while you give some American examples that aren't considered "jury tampering" or whatever the British term is for it, that has nothing to do with UK law.

But their law is wrong though, The UK is slowly losing more freedom. Why do they need to ban media and recording at the courthouse when all the time in the US they have media and it doesn't cause a problem. This is a bad law and needs to be changed. I suspect that the left doesn't want everyone in England to know about these grooming gangs otherwise it could cause them to lose votes, thats why they have this law.

 

[ch33zw1z]

But their law is wrong though, The UK is slowly losing more freedom. Why do they need to ban media and recording at the courthouse when all the time in the US they have media and it doesn't cause a problem. This is a bad law and needs to be changed. I suspect that the left doesn't want everyone in England to know about these grooming gangs otherwise it could cause them to lose votes, thats why they have this law.

Lol...like Britain cares more now what people in the US think.

Your concern trolling is pathetic.

How about they adopt our free speech laws, and we adopt their gun laws.

 

[Victorian Gray]

But their law is wrong though, The UK is slowly losing more freedom. Why do they need to ban media and recording at the courthouse when all the time in the US they have media and it doesn't cause a problem. This is a bad law and needs to be changed. I suspect that the left doesn't want everyone in England to know about these grooming gangs otherwise it could cause them to lose votes, thats why they have this law.

You simply don't have a fucking clue and are just parroting fascist propaganda. A word to the wise. People who simply parrot things they read or hear without bothering to research for themselves really aren't particularly bright or effective. It's a good thing that you are only a lowly sock and don't have to worry about little things like 'knowledge' and 'facts'. Now, the guy wearing you, he has a serious problem.

 

[Darwin333]

But their law is wrong though, The UK is slowly losing more freedom. Why do they need to ban media and recording at the courthouse when all the time in the US they have media and it doesn't cause a problem. This is a bad law and needs to be changed. I suspect that the left doesn't want everyone in England to know about these grooming gangs otherwise it could cause them to lose votes, thats why they have this law.

From what I understand of the law you can film at the courthouse all you want, you just can't call them "child groomers" or "rapists" or whatever until they have actually been convicted of the crime so you don't affect the jury.

Beyond that I'm not going to give many shits about other nations laws when we have a bunch of fucked up ones here in the US. We have almost 25% of all the worlds inmates, maybe you could get upset about that?

 

[Jhhnn]

From what I understand of the law you can film at the courthouse all you want, you just can't call them "child groomers" or "rapists" or whatever until they have actually been convicted of the crime so you don't affect the jury.

Beyond that I'm not going to give many shits about other nations laws when we have a bunch of fucked up ones here in the US. We have almost 25% of all the worlds inmates, maybe you could get upset about that?

He was previously busted for the same thing & a probationary sentence applied on the condition that he wouldn't do any encores for a period of time. He chose to defy the Court, rarely a good move. It's like Sheriff Joe except there's nobody to rescue him from justice.

 

[vi edit]

Some people really choose pretty rancid buckets of water to carry.

 

[WelshBloke]

But their law is wrong though, The UK is slowly losing more freedom. Why do they need to ban media and recording at the courthouse when all the time in the US they have media and it doesn't cause a problem.

I dunno. You've had a few "trial by media" cases that would have been better without so much press attention.

This is a bad law and needs to be changed. I suspect that the left doesn't want everyone in England to know about these grooming gangs otherwise it could cause them to lose votes, thats why they have this law.

I suspect that you make these posts because you're a fucking idiot. You genuinely think that this law was introduced in the knowledge that in the future it could be used against the knucklehead?

 

[Jhhnn]

I suspect that you make these posts because you're a fucking idiot. You genuinely think that this law was introduced in the knowledge that in the future it could be used against the knucklehead?

Of course he does. Because freedumb & shit.

 

[Incorruptible]

From what I understand of the law you can film at the courthouse all you want, you just can't call them "child groomers" or "rapists" or whatever until they have actually been convicted of the crime so you don't affect the jury.

Beyond that I'm not going to give many shits about other nations laws when we have a bunch of fucked up ones here in the US. We have almost 25% of all the worlds inmates, maybe you could get upset about that?

What if he says they were accused of it? What if there multiple members of the media lets say over 20, would all of them have been arrested?

Twill speak out when I see injustice, whether its in the US or around the world.

Check out my thread on ending the drug war which would easily lower the amount of inmates but the leftist scum are more interested in attacking the Constitution and freedom though.

https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/the-war-on-drugs-a-failure.2293658/

 

[sdifox]

What if he says they were accused of it? What if there multiple members of the media lets say over 20, would all of them have been arrested?

Twill speak out when I see injustice, whether its in the US or around the world.

Check out my thread on ending the drug war which would easily lower the amount of inmates but the leftist scum are more interested in attacking the Constitution and freedom though.

https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/the-war-on-drugs-a-failure.2293658/

What if you were smart? You wouldn't be making this argument.

 

[MixMasterTang]

What if he says they were accused of it? What if there multiple members of the media lets say over 20, would all of them have been arrested?

Twill speak out when I see injustice, whether its in the US or around the world.

Check out my thread on ending the drug war which would easily lower the amount of inmates but the leftist scum are more interested in attacking the Constitution and freedom though.

https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/the-war-on-drugs-a-failure.2293658/

In your scenario above, how many of those 20 members of the media were under a strict court order that banned them from doing so?

 

[Incorruptible]

In your scenario above, how many of those 20 members of the media were under a strict court order that banned them from doing so?

Tommy Robinson shouldn't have been under the court order though. This whole thing was about specifically targeting him and trying to shut him down because they dont want him to expose the rape gangs and sharia law. They were willing to do whatever it takes to shut him up. The leftists are working with the jihadists to stop him.

 

[sdifox]

Tommy Robinson shouldn't have been under the court order though. This whole thing was about specifically targeting him and trying to shut him down because they dont want him to expose the rape gangs and sharia law. They were willing to do whatever it takes to shut him up. The leftists are working with the jihadists to stop him.

Right, they made a law just for this fucktard. You seem to be a big fan. You should fly over and pick up where he left off and continue the fight.

 

[Darwin333]

What if he says they were accused of it? What if there multiple members of the media lets say over 20, would all of them have been arrested?

Twill speak out when I see injustice, whether its in the US or around the world.

Check out my thread on ending the drug war which would easily lower the amount of inmates but the leftist scum are more interested in attacking the Constitution and freedom though.

https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/the-war-on-drugs-a-failure.2293658/

I don't know about UK law but I assume that saying they are accused of a crime would be perfectly legit. Is that what he did?

Also the US often bars you from certain activities as a condition of your probation, activities that would otherwise be legal. He agreed to those restrictions and he broke them.

 

[Victorian Gray]

Tommy Robinson shouldn't have been under the court order though. This whole thing was about specifically targeting him and trying to shut him down because they dont want him to expose the rape gangs and sharia law. They were willing to do whatever it takes to shut him up. The leftists are working with the jihadists to stop him.

Bullshit you trolling sock puppet. You're defending a nazi for willfully breaking the law even after having been informed where your information is not only wrong but outright lies. So, where does that leave you? Are you a simple minded, useful idiot? Are you the same type of shit fascist/nazi that he is? Or, are you actually a supporter of the scum on trial and you're hoping that Yaxley fucks up the case so that they get off. Hmmmm?

 

[Darwin333]

Tommy Robinson shouldn't have been under the court order though. This whole thing was about specifically targeting him and trying to shut him down because they dont want him to expose the rape gangs and sharia law. They were willing to do whatever it takes to shut him up. The leftists are working with the jihadists to stop him.

Yet he agreed to those conditions after he broke the law the first time. He had the ability to refuse and chose not to.

 

[Jhhnn]

Tommy Robinson shouldn't have been under the court order though. This whole thing was about specifically targeting him and trying to shut him down because they dont want him to expose the rape gangs and sharia law. They were willing to do whatever it takes to shut him up. The leftists are working with the jihadists to stop him.

The reason he was under court order was that he plead guilty to breaking the law. The court gave him a break with probation. In the UK, they'll bust anybody who does what he did to get there. That's really pretty simple.

But he just had to do it again.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...tly-jailed-in-britain/?utm_term=.e175f3b39c50

"I'm livestreaming me harassing dark skinned guys going into the courthouse because they might be the accused! For the Children!"

 

[pmv]

Tommy Robinson shouldn't have been under the court order though. This whole thing was about specifically targeting him and trying to shut him down because they dont want him to expose the rape gangs and sharia law. They were willing to do whatever it takes to shut him up. The leftists are working with the jihadists to stop him.

Don't let the facts get in the way of your pity-me-poor-victim conspiracy-theories.