Literally everything you wrote was wrong, about the Ravens, about Aaron Rodgers love of overinflated balls past NFL spec, about the NFL even finding evidence of tampering. Why should i believe what you're writing now? If the refs tested the balls before the game, it would be virtually impossible for the pats to deflate the balls without getting caught and getting in trouble. You're an idiot.
I've mostly skimmed the last 100 or so posts, because this thread has jumped the full retard bandwagon and rushed balls-deep into drooling imbecile territory, but I'll indulge this comment of yours, anyway.
--All I have seen from your responses is a flat rejection of irrefutable evidence. such as:
--Aaron Rodgers: "Yeah, I love to push balls past the limit, often above the allowed tolerance and see if the refs notice it."
--Phokus: "LMAO! You lied about Aaron Rodgers saying that--he has never overinflated the balls! LMAO-U-R-RETARD!"
--NFL investigation: "We tested all of the balls used during the game before, and after. It is clear that 11 of the 12 balls used by NE were underinflated."
--Phokus: "LMAO! You lied about the NFL finding evidence of tampering! LMAO! NE never did that! LMAO!"
When someone posts the rules, straight from the NFL rulebook--a primary source of information that is, literally, immune from bias--you respond with some random jamoke's interpretation of the rulebook.
It baffles me that you consider any of your responses relevant to the discussion.
All this being said, this is the biggest sports farce that I can recall. Yes--there is a reason to address what certainly appears to be a flat violation of the rules, whether it is an understood truth among all athletes in the league that is simply done and so everyone is guilty, and perhaps the Patriots with their well-documented history of flaunting the rules appear as the scapegoats in all of this, it remains something that needs to be addressed.
I don't for a second think that the Patriots should be replaced in the superbowl, that they should lose draft pics, that the Colts had more than a 2% chance of winning that game anyway, but at some point you have to revise the standard that Manning and Brady lobbied for: either continue to let them treat the balls how they wish--I fail to see how this really is a real problem, if every MLB athlete gets to use their own bat, for example--or have the balls controlled by the officials at the beginning of the game, and controlled by their staff throughout.