Hugo Drax
Diamond Member
Demagogy aside, a problem is that (most likely) the majority of the people in the UK were for remaining in the EU.
If that is the case how do you explain the 52 vs 48
remain people to lazy to get in line and vote?
Demagogy aside, a problem is that (most likely) the majority of the people in the UK were for remaining in the EU.
You might want to check the voting stats for London on this referendum before talking out of your ass.
It's hard to educate people when the experts who could do the educating are brushed aside as fearmongering.maybe educate the people instead playing the racist and overused Nazi card things could have turned out different.
If that is the case how do you explain the 52 vs 48
remain people to lazy to get in line and vote?
It is non binding.The vote is over. The UK is out of the EU.
The vote is over. The UK is out of the EU.
Scottish Independence Round Two coming soon!
i.e. the 401K plansmeh, itll go back up
People who voted for Brexit are going to shit themselves when this precipitates the final breakup of the UK. Scotland is now decidedly headed for the door and Northern Ireland is rumbling about unification.
So what you would do to address the concerns of the 52%?
Wow 52% of people in the UK are nazi xenophobes. This according to what the 48% claim the other side represent.
I wonder of the whole Nazi meme and throwing out accusations of racism did not exactly help sell the remain in the EU program.
You dont close a sale if you insult your customer.
If that is the case how do you explain the 52 vs 48
remain people to lazy to get in line and vote?
To quote one comment: How about "No one wants to be enslaved by unelected bankers anymore"?
Another note of interest.
Soviet leader Putin and terrorist countries over in the middle east are celebrating this vote.
Why?
For the very same reason Bin Ladin sent terrorist to fly planes into the world trade center.
NOT to kill 3000+ Americans, oh no that was not his objective.
The planes were sent to attack buildings on American soil to hit America where it hurts.
In the Economy.
If Putin is celebrating this vote across the ocean, and if terrorist nations within the middle east are celebrating this vote, THAT is a true dire prediction of what is to come for freedom and democracy.
If those that hate America are celebrating, then what do they know that we don't?
And how does this tie in with our presidential election?
Could they believe, predict, rely on a president Donald Trump doing what terrorist flying airplanes could never do?
Sleep well. 😉
Bullshit, Brexit is not good for Russia at all. A global economic slowdown or European recession means depressed demand means lower prices for Russian oil and gas.
Putin is making these comments about Brexit and Trump to troll his rivals in Western Governments.
You are assuming that economics are the only thing in the world.
A quick glance at Soviet economic history, or the current Russian economy and politics, and what, where, and when the Russian government is concerning itself with, should be all that is needed to understand this.
I have no idea what that is supposed to mean. Russia is far more economically integrated with the rest of the world than the USSR was, and aside from beating up on old Soviet satellite states, or propping up the odd dictator, their military is irrelevant.
"You should really get yourself to the hospital because you just shot yourself in the dick, and even if they can't make it like it was before you shot yourself in the dick, smart, professionally trained people can at least minimize the damage of this stupid thing you did to yourself"
is a pretty good metaphor for the advice I'd give to Britain if it were a sentient being.
It is no-one's job to "sell" anything to a bunch of petulant children. I'm sorry you feel so insulted. Are these microagressions more than your fragile ego can handle?
I don't know... 'old angry racists outnumber young people that actually care about their futures' is probably how I'd explain it.
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley
My three reasons for departure, in strict order of precedence, were Democracy, Democracy, and Democracy. For the so-called “European Parliament” is no Parliament. It is a mere duma. It lacks even the power to bring forward a bill, and the 28 faceless, unelected, omnipotent Kommissars – the official German name for the shadowy Commissioners who exercise the supreme lawmaking power that was once vested in our elected Parliament – have the power, under the Treaty of Maastricht, to meet behind closed doors to override in secret any decision of that “Parliament” at will, and even to issue “Commission Regulations” that bypass it altogether.
Worse, the treaty that established the European Stability Pact gives its governing body of absolute bankers the power, at will and without consultation, to demand any sum of money, however large, from any member state, and every member of that governing body, personally as well as collectively, is held entirely immune not only from any civil suit but also from any criminal prosecution.
That is dictatorship in the formal sense. Good riddance to it.
Nah, it's not.
First, Brexit is a political platform. Like every other political platform, it actually has zero to do with the issue, which is just scaremongering - "we must DO THING, otherwise BAD THING happens". The Scottish independence campaign was the same thing.
Being in the EU has some practical and some non practical downsides, which those on the platform lament: practical, there's immigration, and we pay more for EU projects; non-practical, we might have a ban on prawn flavoured chips, because every government throws out some retarded law every now and then - they all do.
Immigration is done now; we already don't have jobs, more immigration now means just that the immigrants have a harder time getting *their* jobs. British jobs (those jobs that are gained through nepotism and connections) are not at risk; it's just the immigrant jobs which are at risk now, meaning if you work at Tesco, you will get even less money.
Leaving the EU creates potential for chaos, which is exactly what certain people want. There WILL be massive costs increases, just like there were when the Euro rolled out in 2000, not because of any influencing factor, but because any situation which creates change and confusion is a good chance for speculators - raise prices when everyone else does; and they do it when complex events occur.
i.e. if there was a meteor strike - prices would raise. "Q: why is this sandwich so expensive now? A: the meteor strike." ah ok.
obviously the meteor strike has nothing to do with the change in prices, it's just an excuse. but since every speculator does it, it's impossible to fight the price bump. It's also confusing to see everyone bump prices, and the move looks legit for a while.
During the last leg of the Yes campaign, about half the business leaders in the UK made it VERY CLEAR that if Yes was to pass, prices would go up. BECAUSE.
Britain is also .. honestly, not that great of a nation. They have huge overheads because of these "new" touchy-feely laws, they spend a ton of money on things no reasonable government would, and they no longer have an empire, which is what made britain great in the first place.
As a producer, it cannot compare to Germany, or even Poland. Or, to be correct .. they are on the way down. Their monetary worth is devaluing.
The pound losing a large portion of its worth was obvious from the first day; keeping the pound instead of adopting the euro is irrelevant - from a purely mathematical pov, they are two mintings of the same coin; both are freely exchangable with the other, and the pound no longer has a portion of its worth based on the political stability of the UK, as other EU countries are just as, if not more, stable.
Once a country melds itself to another, so much as we have done, coinage is irrelevant - the two systems will homogenize, if nothing, simply for the fact that as long as one money has more value, it will tend to move towards where it is worth more.
And really, the cold war is over; foreign investors are no longer worried that, idk, the president of Lithuania might want everyone to wear their underwear outside, thus making their money crash. Or force them to learn Swedish, to the same effect.
witty Bananas reference http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066808/reference
I doubt that Britain would have remained a major economical power even if they stayed out of the EU. But anyway, right now they are undeniably no more powerful, and important, than most EU countries; Poland for example, their GDP keeps increasing. Their economy is going up, they are politically stable. Investors believe there's money to be made (it's true) and therefore place more importance on investments located there rather than in the UK.
one last thing..
immigration, border control .. these things are simply impossible in the UK. You really need to live here to understand howthese people are, it's easily comparable to the URRS. The "humanistic" laws they have here prevent them from doing anything which could possibly harm a fly, yet they somehow want to magically go back to a time where the value of the pound was backed by colonialist trade regimes, exploitation, masses of workers without protection, minimal spending, the draft, and a huge imposing (and badly paid) army in a time of war.mentally fucked
It's not going to happen. They can't kick out of the country people who have arrived illegally and have been caught repeatedly scam the system (also illegal) because "it would hurt their feelings", they surely cannot go back to rum, sodomy and the lash.
if anything, they should stfu and let Angela Merkel tell them what to do, she seems to have far more sense than we do.
do i get any bonus for this post?
This kind of statement conveys layers of meaning. The first layer is the literal meaning of the words: I lack the knowledge to figure this out. But the second, intended meaning is the opposite: I am so vastly superior that I cannot even imagine the cognitive errors or moral turpitude that could lead someone to such obviously wrong conclusions. And yet the takeaway when I hear someone say this is a third meaning: I lack the empathy, moral imagination or analytical skills to attempt even a basic understanding of the people who disagree with me. In short, this argument says: "I'm stupid."