Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
I really want to get a Dyson. But I own two dirt devils that still work and the b/f went into a huge rant in the store about spending over $500 on a vacuum cleaner while already owning two and how I didn't need it, just vacuum more often and yada, yada, yada...
And I did not have a good enough justification to argue his points, so I did not get one.
But I still want one.
From what I hear they're good, but there are much cheaper vacuums that are just as good (~$200 range). Of course anyone who has one will insist they're worth the money, because nobody wants to admit to themselves that they wasted money.
That's always the truth in the end.
I've also read that while the Dyson excells on bare floors, they are mid-pack on carpet, which may not be so farfetched as, since it was designed in Britian, the Brits are not into wall-to-wall carpeting as we in the U.S. are, instead using area and throw rugs around their bare wood floors.
We've a Hoover Windtunnel self-propelled, a couple of years old, that pulls anythign and everything out of the carpet. I ran over an 18" length of chain made of 1/4"-long links, and that vacuum sucked it into its bag. Made a horrible racket getting passed the beater brush and motor, and I was sure I'd damaged the machine, but the chain disappeared.
Fortunately, the vacuum is still working quite well, as we have 3 dogs and 4 cats inside so hair control is a must. That little Hoover, actually isn't so little really, just makes all their hair disappear. And the bag system is MUCH cleaner to empty than those bagless systems. NO matter how well the bagless are designed, you have to pour the crap out, and you get bombed by a dust cloud. The bag.....just slides off its fitting, gets put into the trash bag, new bag slides on. No dirt, no dust.