lavaheadache
Diamond Member
- Jan 28, 2005
- 6,893
- 14
- 81
His card is "prematurely" throttling too
Are you saying NV's $1000 'uber priced' card is so flimsy and at the limits that it's ready to break with any extra voltage.
Or alternatively are you are beating the NV sales drum which is trying to limit what you can do with the card to enforce their absurd pricing strategy.
Either way it doesn't fly and you're right I won't buy this turd in it's current form. I may have to wait for an 8970, hopefully it will be out within a year (and potentially beat this card into just a bad memory).
Yeah the card itself is fine, but it's neutered and overpriced. I doubt the lightning will even be allowed to resurrect this cards flaws (actually NV's flaws, the card would otherwise likely be capable).
Jesus, if that doesnt sound like a whiny immature fanboi, I dont know what does....LMAO...classic!
Heh, don't tell him, but I had him pegged from his first GTX 690 Borderlands 2 post.
Jesus, if that doesnt sound like a whiny immature fanboi, I dont know what does....LMAO...classic!
Had a little time to play with mine. I think as a pair they top out at 1170 on the core, one is a little stronger and can do a hair over 1200.
1170/7000
![]()
I've had the Unigine demos last for hours at 7000 memory. 3DMark11 will crashing within a minute with the memory at 7000. Even at 6500 I can see artifacts now and then. Looping 3DMark11 is a really good stability test.
I've had the Unigine demos last for hours at 7000 memory. 3DMark11 will crash within a minute with the memory at 7000. Even at 6500 I can see artifacts now and then. Looping 3DMark11 is a really good stability test for Titans.
Can I get your honest opinion... Are you happy with them for the price?
I was thinking about selling my car audio system that has been sitting in my basement for one of these.
3DMark 11, Valley, Heaven & Crysis 3 are all running fine for me. I am using the BIOS from OCN that fixes the throttling though. So the cards have more available power to them. It's core overclock that will crash me.
I was never happy with the price, even when it was pre-release and rumoured to be $900 rather than $1000. Performance wise they are pretty much insane. With the overclock a single one of these Titans is equal to a GTX 690. Now that someone over at OCN figured out how to fix the artificial throttling the cards have before they hit their limits with the custom BIOS, there is some suspicion it is intentional by nvidia. They have said they're aware of the problem though and most likely they will wind up removing it via drivers or a BIOS release. If the cards were reviewed like they perform with this BIOS, they would of made the 690 look completely irrelevant. Look at how a 690 performs at your resolution, minus the multi-gpu headaches, then decide if that is worth $1000 to you.
There is no way you would be disappointed with the performance, that's for sure. The price is still disappointing though.. lol. Probably because even at 2560x1600 there are only a few games that actually needed the power increase over 680SLI.
edit: I should also say that from what people at OCN who are running this BIOS say; the cards run a lot hotter. Usually 80-85C even with a high fan speed. The artificial throttling may be there to maintain the cool and quiet characteristic they were pushing. I have mine water-cooled. The highest I've seen them get is 48C.
edit: I should also say that from what people at OCN who are running this BIOS say; the cards run a lot hotter. Usually 80-85C even with a high fan speed. The artificial throttling may be there to maintain the cool and quiet characteristic they were pushing. I have mine water-cooled. The highest I've seen them get is 48C.