A few weeks...or would you advise people to buy something
else rather than waiting a few times ?
Redacted
We can keep going in this circle, we're back to "wait".
True if november is the last month of this year , i likeA few more weeks and it's Q1.
Great but the claim still stand , AIB radeons
will be hardly if not at all matched by the 780ti.
Is that with or without Mantle in BF4 for example....JK
The NVidia loyalist will always buy what NVidia offers.
The AMD loyalist will always buy what AMD offers.
The bang for buck crowd has a open mind and shops price vs performance.
The educated buyer currently is in a holding pattern as there is currently too much dust in the air to get a clear picture.
If I was in the market currently I'd have to wait for the dust to settle.
A few more weeks and it's Q1.
Then few weeks more and press will likely be receiving their first Maxwell samples
Hardware.fr posted the numbers , 3 resolutions 15 games,
the results back my sayings and for thoses who think that
it s a biaised review keep on mind that the reviewer is known
to have a preference for Nvidia but when doing reviews he s
quite professional and neutral.
http://www.hardware.fr/articles/912-22/recapitulatif-performances.html
What's your point? I only was stating that there are more than one type of buyers in the GPU market is all.
Good things come to those who wait....So they say.
I'm all about bang for buck at time of need.
What's your point? I only was stating that there are more than one type of buyers in the GPU market is all.
Good things come to those who wait....So they say.
I'm all about bang for buck at time of need.
AMD's slogan should be "Just wait for us..."
It would cover their position against Intel AND Nvidia. Think of the marketing money they'd save. They can put their whole catalog under one banner and slogan. Haha.
Currently for thoses who cant wait the reference 290
is the better offering whatever the drama about its
cooler , price perf/ratio is the stronghold of this card,
even lower performing parts have trouble reaching
the same numbers in this matter.
Will you both say otherwise without stretching reality.?.
Currently for thoses who cant wait the reference 290
is the better offering whatever the drama about its
cooler , price perf/ratio is the stronghold of this card,
even lower performing parts have trouble reaching
the same numbers in this matter.
Will you both say otherwise without stretching reality.?.
If your stating that the r290 even in it's current configuration is the best bang for the buck currently I'd agree....Not sure why you took my statement as anti-r290.
Waiting it out also give the future r290 buyer a chance to get a peak at how Mantle will effect BF4's performance. If it's a pretty sizeable gain then it's going to be icing on the cake.
If your a NVidia fan then maybe it's best to hope Mantle lives up to the hype. I'd think if the r290's ridicule even the GTX 780Ti a price adjustment will follow.
I only speak for myself and no one else.
Saw the acoustics across various sites, owned a Ref HD 7970 that operated at lower temps (thus lower fan speed) and absolutely hated it.
Pass on Ref R9 290, and if you need to know, I'm Pro AMD. I sold my CFX 7970's and was ready to buy until I saw the results. I choked on my coffee and then said "nope, I'm not going to be your fool again." I'll wait.
While I'm waiting, I might just pick up a second 660 Ti and go SLI until 14nm, I mean, $150 (or less, haggle powers GO!) for a used 660 Ti versus $400+ for a R9 290 for about the same performance, less noise, less heat, less power consumption, and it's just a band aid since this is the end of the 20nm generation...why not.
Is that with or without Mantle in BF4 for example....JK
The NVidia loyalist will always buy what NVidia offers.
The AMD loyalist will always buy what AMD offers.
The bang for buck crowd has a open mind and shops price vs performance.
The educated buyer currently is in a holding pattern as there is currently too much dust in the air to get a clear picture.
If I was in the market currently I'd have to wait for the dust to settle.
This. After the Ti review I'm going to wait and see what the AIBs come up with for the 290. If the situation doesn't improve I will have to break down and purchase 2x Tis
You really should use google translate. Those cards are only available for preorder...Take a pick:
Inno3D iChill GeForce GTX 780 Ti HerculeZ X3 Ultra
Inno3D GeForce GTX 780 Ti HerculeZ 2000
EVGA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Superclocked ACX
I only speak for myself and no one else.
Saw the acoustics across various sites, owned a Ref HD 7970 that operated at lower temps (thus lower fan speed) and absolutely hated it.
Pass on Ref R9 290, and if you need to know, I'm Pro AMD. I sold my CFX 7970's and was ready to buy until I saw the results. I choked on my coffee and then said "nope, I'm not going to be your fool again." I'll wait.
While I'm waiting, I might just pick up a second 660 Ti and go SLI until 14nm, I mean, $150 (or less, haggle powers GO!) for a used 660 Ti versus $400+ for a R9 290 for about the same performance, less noise, less heat, less power consumption, and it's just a band aid since this is the end of the 20nm generation...why not.
Exactly my reasons for staying away from R9 290/X. Before anyone gets all upset I am only referring to the reference fan, not the actual GPU which is clearly excellent.
Odd. I have a retail XFX branded 290X and it has no problem hitting the advertised 1Ghz clock speeds and holding it.
I suspect after examination that the cooler is not the real
culprit of the retail cards unability to run within specs with
reduced speeds in respect of the ref cards..
A hint :
/snip