- Jan 4, 2001
- 41,596
- 19
- 81
I'm looking at this one. Thoughts? Suggestions? Ideas? Equations? Anything?
Just found this one too which includes the extension cable. Has anyone read anything about these, or used them? They sound really nifty.
I just hope Apacer does a better job making USB drives than they do at translating. From their product page: "Have you been trouble in taking a lot of 3.5 disks for business?"
I bought the Apacer drive, and so far I like it. Quick and easy - plugged it into the USB 2.0 port on my 8RDA+ motherboard; WinXP ID'd it right away, installed drivers, and it was ready in about 15 seconds. A subsequent plugin took only maybe 2 seconds to ready the drive. I just transferred 24.1MB of data (14 video files from this awesome site and it took 8.76s to complete; 2.751MB/sec, translates to about 22Mbit/sec transfer speed. Not exactly USB 2.0 specs, but it's fast enough for me.
It is quite light - almost feels like it's completely empty actually. It also gets a little warm when it's plugged in. The cable it comes with can be handy for those of us who don't have USB ports on the front of our PC's.
Win98 compatibility just tested: The USB drive needs a driver installed for this OS, downloadable from Apacer's website; I decompressed the ZIPfile's contents to a RAMdrive, burned it to a CD, and installed it on a P2 366 laptop running Win98, and rebooted. I stuck the USB drive into the laptop's USB port; it was ID'd, drivers installed, and it was ready, just like in WinXP. I was able to play the MPEG files directly off of the drive with no problems. It really is handy.
Update: The USB drive is still working just fine; the difference between USB 2.0 and 1.1 is quite significant, having tried it on both. It's pretty quick on USB 2.0, but USB 1.1 - much slower, which is to be expected.
Also, some of you inquired about booting off of a USB device. That may be possible; I've not yet explored that fully. However, I found this page, which says this:
Just found this one too which includes the extension cable. Has anyone read anything about these, or used them? They sound really nifty.
I just hope Apacer does a better job making USB drives than they do at translating. From their product page: "Have you been trouble in taking a lot of 3.5 disks for business?"
I bought the Apacer drive, and so far I like it. Quick and easy - plugged it into the USB 2.0 port on my 8RDA+ motherboard; WinXP ID'd it right away, installed drivers, and it was ready in about 15 seconds. A subsequent plugin took only maybe 2 seconds to ready the drive. I just transferred 24.1MB of data (14 video files from this awesome site and it took 8.76s to complete; 2.751MB/sec, translates to about 22Mbit/sec transfer speed. Not exactly USB 2.0 specs, but it's fast enough for me.
It is quite light - almost feels like it's completely empty actually. It also gets a little warm when it's plugged in. The cable it comes with can be handy for those of us who don't have USB ports on the front of our PC's.
Win98 compatibility just tested: The USB drive needs a driver installed for this OS, downloadable from Apacer's website; I decompressed the ZIPfile's contents to a RAMdrive, burned it to a CD, and installed it on a P2 366 laptop running Win98, and rebooted. I stuck the USB drive into the laptop's USB port; it was ID'd, drivers installed, and it was ready, just like in WinXP. I was able to play the MPEG files directly off of the drive with no problems. It really is handy.
Update: The USB drive is still working just fine; the difference between USB 2.0 and 1.1 is quite significant, having tried it on both. It's pretty quick on USB 2.0, but USB 1.1 - much slower, which is to be expected.
Also, some of you inquired about booting off of a USB device. That may be possible; I've not yet explored that fully. However, I found this page, which says this:
I guess it's like doing brain surgery on yourself - cut the wrong thing, and your arms are rendered useless, and so you're screwed.While having a bootable USB device may be handy for those needing to do extensive anti-virus cleanings or hardware testing, I do not recommend using the bootable feature for BIOS flashes; if a BIOS change involves USB accesses, the USB change could stop the flash from functioning properly and thus render your computer dead. This is true with every USB drive, not just this one ? be smart, flash from a floppy!