It seems to me that this is the first time you have proofread someone else's paper since you display a forceful and defensive attitude that possibly fears the daunting task of correcting such a malformed paper. Additionally, your comments in the essay contain their own mistakes.
Everyone writes differently by using the tools available in a manner different from others. Try to work with a person's writing style rather than force your style and you may learn a few new ways to communicate.
Additionally, a person puts a lot of personal effort into writing their paper. It is helpful to be pleasant and calm while limiting your comments to concepts you are absolutely certain on. Too many forceful changes over wording that could go either way will provide a reason for a person not to trust your comments.
Most papers contain the following:
- Introductory paragraph
- One to three body paragraphs
- Conclusion paragraph
with each paragraph containing at least three sentences.
The introductory paragraph contains the subject and the person's position.
The body paragraphs contain points supporting the stated position.
The conclusion combines the stated points to re-iterate the chosen position.
This reiteration of the structural basics of an essay may appear unneccessary but sticking with the basic structure makes it easier to write a good paper.
The use of
transition words between supporting concepts can be successfully utilized when used sparingly. Such words include "additionally", "furthermore", and "moreover". Such words always seemed pretentious to me but the best papers I have seen always used each of them once. I am not sure why this is but it could be because they are basic, well understood, and not ambiguous. I know the next point will be stated when I read one of those transition words.
The use of active verbs instead of passive verbs is also a
good lesson to learn. Unfortunately for me, this is still a weakness of mine.
Comment T1: The title "Essay 1" is as real as any other and does not really matter since it may have been selected by the professor.
Comment T4: The use of "friggin" displays immaturity as well as a lack of culture and a refined education.
Comment T15: The use of "much more" is redundant and unnecessary.
Other than that, some solid assistance is provided. Although, it should be mentioned that many things have been missed.
One thing I notice is this paper is filled with commonly spoken vernacular that is inappropriate for a written paper. For instance, the first paragraph states "At eighteen you are a legal adult...". At eighteen what? Who or what is "you"? People often use the term "you" when referring to various entities such as themselves or anyone in general when speaking. To restate my point, such conversational speech does not belong in a paper. The previous statement could be restated as follows. "At the age of eighteen, a (person/teenager/youth) legally transitions into an adult."
"... but society still has a hard time taking you seriously." Who is this statement directed to? Is it directed to me? Society does not have a hard time taking
me seriously. ... Well, sometimes.
I disagree with Leon Botstein's opinion that sixteen year olds are ready to graduate high school because they are not responsible enough to be in the real worlds as adults. In California, at the age of sixteen you can receive your drivers license and apply for your first job. Many sixteen year olds are entering their sophomore year of high school, making new friends, and trying to figure out to hold down a job while still keeping up with their studies on top of having a personal life. How could a sixteen year old who can barely handle their own responsibilities be able to hold the [resposnibilities] of an eighteen year old adult? At eighteen you are a legal adult who has more responsibilities than any sixteen year old. At eighteen you are a legal adult, but society still has a hard time taking you seriously. It would be close to almost impossible for our society to see a sixteen year old as a serious, responsible, adult. Most sixteen year olds have the high school mentality of wanting to party and that life is just all fun and games. Although most/many/some will say we are mature because puberty has started earlier than it did years ago, it does not mean our mind and maturity has developed at the same rate.
What is Leon Botstein's opinion?
- "that sixteen year olds are ready to graduate high school", or
- "that sixteen year olds are ready to graduate high school because they are not responsible enough to be in the real worlds as adults."
The first sentence confuses me. Is this Leon Botstein's opinion or Leon's opinion stated with an argument why the author disagrees with his opinion?
This first paragraph is too large. The introductory paragraph should introduce the subject and state the author's stance on the subject. The current introductory paragraph includes an ambiguous statement of the subject with the author's position, including an argument for the author's position.
How could a sixteen year old who can barely handle their own responsibilities be able to hold the resposnibilities of an eighteen year old adult?
Do not state questions in manner to implicitly state a point in the discussion. It is the author's responsibility to explicitly state a position and points to support that position. This is what writing is all about. Writing involves the communication of ideas and the writer loses control over the audiences direction of thought with ambiguously empty statements such as the statement of unanswered questions.
In my opinion, the author's chosen position is not the best position to take. Graduating high school is not about a person being ready to assume the responsibilities of an adult as much as it is about having obtained the most basic level of skills necessary to successfully interact with adults in a complex society. This position could be developed further through responsibility, having developed the ability to learn more, and a recognition of the basic components of our society.
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
A good writing style is something you have to develop by yourself.
Actually, I have found one of the best methods of learning is to see how someone else does something better than I did.
Please forgive me if my response is too wordy. Earlier this evening,
Syringer introduced a wonderful idea for the evening and I have been enjoying myself ever since.
I do not think there is need for me to continue, especially since my glass is now empty.
