This is exactly why modern art is complete trash.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

CptFarlow

Senior member
Apr 8, 2005
381
0
0
Originally posted by: Gobadgrs
I've also wondered if I could just crap in a box and put it on display.

Hell if they have a cricifix on display in a vat of piss, or a bottle filled full of the artist's blood, they should take my Poop in a box 05.


Yeah, and if any of it looks like the virgin Mary than the value triples.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
it's like American Eagle, Nike or anything else.

Slap a label on something and suckers will pay exorbitant amount of money for it.
 

silverpig

Lifer
Jul 29, 2001
27,703
12
81
It's stupid. I went to the art gallery here. There was some good stuff by the old dutch artists. Paintings of flowers and fruit bowls etc. Not my cup of tea, but I can definitely respect the talent required for that. Then I went to the modern section. Broken tvs sitting in stacks of tires... paint splattered all over the place... There was a red board leaning against a wall. Yeah, a board, painted red, leaning against the wall. WTF.
 

QuitBanningMe

Banned
Mar 2, 2005
5,038
2
0
I was watching some show (60 minutes I think) where they had kindergartners do some paintings and put them on display with "artists" paintings. It was funny to watch the "experts" talk about how much skill the "artists"(kindergartners) had.
 

QuitBanningMe

Banned
Mar 2, 2005
5,038
2
0
Originally posted by: NOLOVE
Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe
Originally posted by: NOLOVE
Not all 'art' is about skill, ignoramus.

What is it about?
Ask the artist, its different for each and every one.

Really? Do most people talk to the artist that painted the paintings they pay big bucks for?

I expected you might have a better explanation like it has to do with the thoughts/ emotions felt when individuals view the piece.
 

Lorn

Banned
Nov 28, 2004
2,143
0
0
Allow me to elaborate -

Where would we be today if artists, musicians, dancers, actors just did the same stuff as before? Where would we be without people who let go of the archaic figure drawings and let their own person take over? Where would we be without some of the avant garde actor movements in history? We'd still be scared of the edge of a flat earth, and we'd probably be way behind on acting as we laugh at Leave It To Beaver jokes.

Whether you like the work or not, it is changing the world around you.

Edit: Let me just say that I don't find this guy's work at all amusing, or even interesting, but I do respect what it is and what he is doing.
 

TitanDiddly

Guest
Dec 8, 2003
12,696
1
0
I'm going to staple my dirty underwear to a piece of plywood, then very carefully crate and ship it to the metropolitan museum of art with a torn, unreadable invoice. I wonder what they'd do.
 

Wuffsunie

Platinum Member
May 4, 2002
2,808
0
0
Modern art is not about beauty, skill, accuracy, or profound meaning.

It's about making a quick buck from people with too much moeny for their own good.

Modern art is like modern society, only more honest; it is cynical, dissillusioned, greatly inferior to what came before it, creates with simplistic forms and shapes that even the lower primates could master, cares virtually nothing for beauty and elegance except to mock it, and is more concerned with the price of the final product than anything else at all relating to it.

It might as well come with 50 foot flaming letters, screaming "True Art is dead!!" The ultimate goal of all moderm art is the same message that we all seem to agree on; it's complete and utter sh!t,but will fetch thousands to millious of dollars... for no reason whatsoever.

:|
 

QuitBanningMe

Banned
Mar 2, 2005
5,038
2
0
Originally posted by: NOLOVE
Allow me to elaborate -

Where would we be today if artists, musicians, dancers, actors just did the same stuff as before? Where would we be without people who let go of the archaic figure drawings and let their own person take over? Where would we be without some of the avant garde actor movements in history? We'd still be scared of the edge of a flat earth, and we'd probably be way behind on acting as we laugh at Leave It To Beaver jokes.

Whether you like the work or not, it is changing the world around you.

Edit: Let me just say that I don't find this guy's work at all amusing, or even interesting, but I do respect what it is and what he is doing.

Perpetrating a fad based fruad for class distinction? I wouldn't call it a fraud if the people who were drinking what he is selling could tell the difference between a few kindergartners splashing some paint and a modern art "masterpiece".


 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
:Q

I've gotta get into the art business.

One painting is all I'd need to sell.....
 

Lorn

Banned
Nov 28, 2004
2,143
0
0
Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe
Originally posted by: NOLOVE
Allow me to elaborate -

Where would we be today if artists, musicians, dancers, actors just did the same stuff as before? Where would we be without people who let go of the archaic figure drawings and let their own person take over? Where would we be without some of the avant garde actor movements in history? We'd still be scared of the edge of a flat earth, and we'd probably be way behind on acting as we laugh at Leave It To Beaver jokes.

Whether you like the work or not, it is changing the world around you.

Edit: Let me just say that I don't find this guy's work at all amusing, or even interesting, but I do respect what it is and what he is doing.

Perpetrating a fad based fruad for class distinction? I wouldn't call it a fraud if the people who were drinking what he is selling could tell the difference between a few kindergartners splashing some paint and a modern art "masterpiece".
Who are you to decide that his work is done for anyone besides himself? You assume that all modern artists are doing work because they are in it to win some quick cash, and that is incredibly ignorant. I agree that many 'artists' out there are doing this at the moment, but there is no need to generalize about something like this - especially when you are in no place to do so.

Point 1) Not all artwork is done for you or the public.
Point 2) Not all artwork needs to look 'good' to be 'good'.
Point 3) Shh.
 

AntiEverything

Senior member
Aug 5, 2004
939
0
0
The reason modern art exists is so that "art lovers" can put their nose in the air and tell the rest of us who think it's stupid how we're inferior to them, and that if we were their equal we'd understand.

It's mental masturbation.
 

QuitBanningMe

Banned
Mar 2, 2005
5,038
2
0
Originally posted by: NOLOVE
Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe
Originally posted by: NOLOVE
Allow me to elaborate -

Where would we be today if artists, musicians, dancers, actors just did the same stuff as before? Where would we be without people who let go of the archaic figure drawings and let their own person take over? Where would we be without some of the avant garde actor movements in history? We'd still be scared of the edge of a flat earth, and we'd probably be way behind on acting as we laugh at Leave It To Beaver jokes.

Whether you like the work or not, it is changing the world around you.

Edit: Let me just say that I don't find this guy's work at all amusing, or even interesting, but I do respect what it is and what he is doing.

Perpetrating a fad based fruad for class distinction? I wouldn't call it a fraud if the people who were drinking what he is selling could tell the difference between a few kindergartners splashing some paint and a modern art "masterpiece".
Who are you to decide that his work is done for anyone besides himself? You assume that all modern artists are doing work because they are in it to win some quick cash, and that is incredibly ignorant. I agree that many 'artists' out there are doing this at the moment, but there is no need to generalize about something like this - especially when you are in no place to do so.

Point 1) Not all artwork is done for you or the public.
Point 2) Not all artwork needs to look 'good' to be 'good'.
Point 3) Shh.

1. OK take out the artist intentions/ feelings

2. Now all you have is buyers who in general know nothing of the artist intentions dictating what is good art. Why? Class didstinction. The same for "delicacies". Find something rare and therefore expensive even though it taste like ass and call yourself sophisticated as you choke the sh!t down while discussing with your peers all the aspects of the flavor. :roll:

I'm an art fan but modern art is indeed a fruad.