Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I remember certain people in this forum complaining when the Bush campaign came to their town because it disrupted their lives for a whole half day. I wonder how many of those who were so angry at the disruption then have sympathy now for this guy's life being disrupted for days because of the actions of these fruit loops?
LOL, Toucan Sam calling others "Fruit Loops":roll:Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I remember certain people in this forum complaining when the Bush campaign came to their town because it disrupted their lives for a whole half day. I wonder how many of those who were so angry at the disruption then have sympathy now for this guy's life being disrupted for days because of the actions of these fruit loops?
LOL. I think of Toucan Sam every time I see Harvey's avatar.Originally posted by: Red Dawn
LOL, Toucan Sam calling others "Fruit Loops":roll:Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I remember certain people in this forum complaining when the Bush campaign came to their town because it disrupted their lives for a whole half day. I wonder how many of those who were so angry at the disruption then have sympathy now for this guy's life being disrupted for days because of the actions of these fruit loops?
Originally posted by: Tommunist
shooting guns for no reason into the air is REALLY smart. I don't care if he's annoyed - he's not accomplishing anything but showing himself to be irresponsible with firearms.
Originally posted by: ysperalda
Firing a gun in the air as a means of warning people, who BTW, aren't bothering him at all, is linked to protecting private property? They are merely, "blocking his view" and "road", as if the road is his. He has only been there 6 years and chose to live next to Bush, so he can whine all he wishes. If you don't care, why respond?
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: ysperalda
Firing a gun in the air as a means of warning people, who BTW, aren't bothering him at all, is linked to protecting private property? They are merely, "blocking his view" and "road", as if the road is his. He has only been there 6 years and chose to live next to Bush, so he can whine all he wishes. If you don't care, why respond?
It's not their road either.
At times, the protesters, their numbers swollen by crowds of reporters, have blocked the road
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: ysperalda
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
If the real thing isn't coming then what are you warning against? Nothing.
Disagree. You can warn someone without the real thing coming. I mean, the guy could be wary of going to prison, etc.
He was fvcking with them. Plain and simple.
Agree :thumbsup: Probably a combo of warning/fvcking with them.
You obviously don't understand the purpose of a warning shot. To call what he did a "warning shot" is idiotic.
Originally posted by: ysperalda
lol, fvcking with them would imply that hearing gunshots is meant as some sort of light thing that people just shrug off and are aware of. I seriously doubt shooting in the air around people you don't know is meant as "just fvcking with them". Get my vocabulary in order? LMAO, I'm not the one who thinks firing in the air is meant as "fvcking with others" in a sort of game. When a bank robber or any other person shoots a gun in the air, what reaction do people usually have? Do they laugh it off as if they are "just fvcking with them". No, they take it as a warning and either cooperate or try to protect themselves. He would know this and therefore use it for such a reaction. To imply that he wouldn't know this is ridiculous. Respond if you wish and argue your point all day, but it's meaningless to me, k.
Originally posted by: phantom309
Yeah, that's real brave. Firing birdshot into the air to scare a bunch of women and then running away. TEXAS TOUGH.
What's so "Liberal" about it and how does shooting a shotgun in the air on your own property qualify as a warning shot across the bow? It's no different that blowing off a large Firecracker on your property. It wasn't a warning because he wasn't threatening them with violence if they didn't move. It was just a simple expression of frustration.Originally posted by: Condor
And idiotic is so very liberal. Where is the confusion? They totally missed the "across the bow" part.
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
If the real thing isn't coming then what are you warning against? Nothing.
He was fvcking with them. Plain and simple.
Originally posted by: Stunt
There's nothing wrong with this i guess...but the first thing that came to mind was: shooting a gun in a public place is pretty damn hick...:laugh:
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
What's so "Liberal" about it and how does shooting a shotgun in the air on your own property qualify as a warning shot across the bow? It's no different that blowing off a large Firecracker on your property. It wasn't a warning because he wasn't threatening them with violence if they didn't move. It was just a simple expression of frustration.Originally posted by: Condor
And idiotic is so very liberal. Where is the confusion? They totally missed the "across the bow" part.
Originally posted by: cumhail
You know... those bullets have to land somewhere. And in some states (Arizona, for example), he'd be in a whole lot of trouble if they happened to hit someone when they do.
Just something to consider when "just [bleep]ing with" people.
Maybe, but shooting your gun on your own personal property - especially in a field on your own ranch in Texas - is pretty damn common (hick or not.)Originally posted by: Stunt
There's nothing wrong with this i guess...but the first thing that came to mind was: shooting a gun in a public place is pretty damn hick...:laugh:
"Conservatives" in rural Texas != "conservatives in urban Maine, or where ever that whole issue took place. I seriously doubt political affiliation trumps upbringing and social climate. Unless you think the *same* people who complain about this call to prayer would also be forgiving of random shotgun blasts in the town square?The question I have is, why conservatives support any type of noise coming from any property (ie. this guy and his gun, church bells), yet condemn the call to prayer by muslims in the United States. Can someone explain this?
Originally posted by: Stunt
There's nothing wrong with this i guess...but the first thing that came to mind was: shooting a gun in a public place is pretty damn hick...:laugh:
The question I have is, why conservatives support any type of noise coming from any property (ie. this guy and his gun, church bells), yet condemn the call to prayer by muslims in the United States. Can someone explain this?
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Here is what happens with "warning shots"
He was annoyed by the noise outside his window.
8-15-2005 Decorated U.S. Marine opens fire outside Mass. nightclub wounding 15 yr old girl & 20 yr man
Daniel B. Cotnoir will be arraigned on Monday on charges of assault and battery with a deadly weapon and assault with intent to murder after the incident early on Saturday in the city of Lawrence, The Boston Globe said.
Cotnoir had complained to police after a crowd of nearly 30 people gathered outside a nightclub and restaurant near his apartment. After someone hurled a bottle that shattered his bedroom window, Cotnoir fired "a warning shot," the newspaper said.
"He shot into what he thought was a safe area, but there was some ricochet effects that Mr. Cotnoir never intended," his lawyer, Robert F. Kelley, was quoted as saying.
"It was a military-type response to a threatening situation that was civilian in nature."
Cotnoir, a sergeant awarded the 2005 Marine of the Year by the Marine Corps Times, has been struggling psychologically since returning from Iraq in 2004, Kelley said.
