Engineer
Elite Member
Originally posted by: Frackal
I wonder why there couldn't be PRIVATE judicial review of what happened here by a judge cleared for this type of thing
Because the administration doesn't want it that way.
Originally posted by: Frackal
I wonder why there couldn't be PRIVATE judicial review of what happened here by a judge cleared for this type of thing
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Originally posted by: RichardE
Soooooooooooooo why isn't germany getting involved?
Probally because this guy is BS. "IF" it was true, you would see Germany at least saying something about one of there nationals being druged, raped and tortured by the US military.
Again, not the point. The case was not dismissed because it had no merit. It was because the merits of the case were not even allowed to be reviewed.
Why would the case be discussed to potentially leak government secrets to an individual whose country is not even vouching for his story.
There have been secret trials before. This would not be the first. The first phase could be to determine if there is enough evidence to even pursue it. If not, then no harm done. On the other hand, if this is happening then he is due reperations. You keep brining up Germany. Has it occured to you that they might want to stay out of this?
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Originally posted by: RichardE
Soooooooooooooo why isn't germany getting involved?
Probally because this guy is BS. "IF" it was true, you would see Germany at least saying something about one of there nationals being druged, raped and tortured by the US military.
Again, not the point. The case was not dismissed because it had no merit. It was because the merits of the case were not even allowed to be reviewed.
Why would the case be discussed to potentially leak government secrets to an individual whose country is not even vouching for his story.
There have been secret trials before. This would not be the first. The first phase could be to determine if there is enough evidence to even pursue it. If not, then no harm done. On the other hand, if this is happening then he is due reperations. You keep brining up Germany. Has it occured to you that they might want to stay out of this?
Than why would the guy not mention it? Really think this through here.
The US kidnapped and raped and tortured a german citizen. Refused to notify Germany according to his story. This is what is public, yet Germany will not even release anything. Not even a back down but keep face statement of condoning but we are working with American authorities like usually happens. Germany is not some third world country. I think this guys story is bs. And the government is right to give him the finger instead of making there practices public to a bs story.
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
What were the circumstances of his capture?
We don't know, that's the whole point.
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Originally posted by: RichardE
Soooooooooooooo why isn't germany getting involved?
Probally because this guy is BS. "IF" it was true, you would see Germany at least saying something about one of there nationals being druged, raped and tortured by the US military.
Again, not the point. The case was not dismissed because it had no merit. It was because the merits of the case were not even allowed to be reviewed.
Why would the case be discussed to potentially leak government secrets to an individual whose country is not even vouching for his story.
There have been secret trials before. This would not be the first. The first phase could be to determine if there is enough evidence to even pursue it. If not, then no harm done. On the other hand, if this is happening then he is due reperations. You keep brining up Germany. Has it occured to you that they might want to stay out of this?
Than why would the guy not mention it? Really think this through here.
The US kidnapped and raped and tortured a german citizen. Refused to notify Germany according to his story. This is what is public, yet Germany will not even release anything. Not even a back down but keep face statement of condoning but we are working with American authorities like usually happens. Germany is not some third world country. I think this guys story is bs. And the government is right to give him the finger instead of making there practices public to a bs story.
Ok, you think it's BS. Im leaning that way. Now do you KNOW it is? Is there a way that it can be determined as it is? If the government bothered to show up for this, why didn't they bother to investigate and show it's crap? Again, you know this didn't happen how?
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
What were the circumstances of his capture?
We don't know, that's the whole point.
You don't have to hold a hearing to answer that question. I just get suspicious when I read an article that is full of allegations and short on answers. The link is basically a bunch of allegations with no supporting information. The whole point of a news story is to answer the who, what, when, where, why and how questions that I'm asking now. The link leaves you with most of those questions unanswered.
I guess what I'm trying to get at is... was he just sitting in his back yard in Plano, TX, having a beer and minding his own business and turning the 'dogs on his barbeque when the FBI showed up and whisked him off to a secret prison in Afghanistan OR was he picked up on a raid of a Taliban camp?
Now that doesn't excuse his alleged mistreatment, but I'd be curious to know how he came be in the custody of the US and what proof he has of his mistreatment. If you're making kidnapping and false imprisonment charges there should be some sort of story to go along with the charges.
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
What were the circumstances of his capture?
We don't know, that's the whole point.
You don't have to hold a hearing to answer that question. I just get suspicious when I read an article that is full of allegations and short on answers. The link is basically a bunch of allegations with no supporting information. The whole point of a news story is to answer the who, what, when, where, why and how questions that I'm asking now. The link leaves you with most of those questions unanswered.
I guess what I'm trying to get at is... was he just sitting in his back yard in Plano, TX, having a beer and minding his own business and turning the 'dogs on his barbeque when the FBI showed up and whisked him off to a secret prison in Afghanistan OR was he picked up on a raid of a Taliban camp?
Now that doesn't excuse his alleged mistreatment, but I'd be curious to know how he came be in the custody of the US and what proof he has of his mistreatment. If you're making kidnapping and false imprisonment charges there should be some sort of story to go along with the charges.
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: zendari
Repost.
The actions of the Bush administration are quite proper; hence, this judge came to his conclusion.
Gotta love the liberals though. They whine about stuff being illegal, then when the judges who decide whether stuff is legal or illegal find it to be legal, they whine about the judge too.
You'll notice he didn't say the actions are legal or proper, the judge simply said that going ahead with the trial might harm "state secrets". That is a far cry from whatever the hell you are talking about.
He didn't say they were illegal either.
I never said he did, I was just pointing out that your conclusion (that the judge based his conclusion on the actions of the Bush administration being "quite proper") seems to be not quite based on the facts...as usual.
In our nation where people are typically innocent until proven otherwise its up to the liberals to make their case.
Originally posted by: RichardE
I don't, neither do you. The problem is, if this guy even has a chance of proving it, I would think that Germany would protect or at least give a saving face to a German national. I mean, Germany has pretty good relations with the US, even a token statement could be used. I mean, even Germany could have asked for a closed door, sealed, classified documment hearing. What this looks like is this guy is bs'ing. Making a sensational story to garnish press (Iran making Jews wear yellow?) . You are right, I don't know, We will never know, but in this case, with the US would be forced to disclose how it goes about capturing/handling potential terrorist/enemies I think we can safely assume this guy's story is bs.
Originally posted by: AAjax
May I point out that both Dems and Repubs dont seem to seem to mind this type of behaviour. Dont bee fooled, they are in fact the same thing, with the same agenda (just different bullet points)
Originally posted by: Aelius
The definition of evil (I happen to agree with):
"A lack of empathy. A genine incapacity to feel with their fellow man. Evil, I think is the absence of empathy." -Nuremberg
Originally posted by: Aelius
?In the present circumstances, al-Masri?s private interests must give way to the national interest in preserving state secrets,? Ellis wrote.
Truer words could not have come from any German court room in the 1930s and 40s.
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Aelius
The definition of evil (I happen to agree with):
"A lack of empathy. A genine incapacity to feel with their fellow man. Evil, I think is the absence of empathy." -Nuremberg
Accurate, but incomplete. What's left out is WHY...and most often the answer is that it's not a matter of empathy for your fellow man, it's an inability to see the object of your evil as a person at all. Every bit of evil in history begins with the dehumanization of your opponent, whether from religious, social, racial, whatever reasons, the evildoer paints the target as someone not quite human, and therefore an inappropriate target for compassion.
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
What were the circumstances of his capture?
We don't know, that's the whole point.
You don't have to hold a hearing to answer that question. I just get suspicious when I read an article that is full of allegations and short on answers. The link is basically a bunch of allegations with no supporting information. The whole point of a news story is to answer the who, what, when, where, why and how questions that I'm asking now. The link leaves you with most of those questions unanswered.
I guess what I'm trying to get at is... was he just sitting in his back yard in Plano, TX, having a beer and minding his own business and turning the 'dogs on his barbeque when the FBI showed up and whisked him off to a secret prison in Afghanistan OR was he picked up on a raid of a Taliban camp?
Now that doesn't excuse his alleged mistreatment, but I'd be curious to know how he came be in the custody of the US and what proof he has of his mistreatment. If you're making kidnapping and false imprisonment charges there should be some sort of story to go along with the charges.
I'm actually agreeing with you 😉 Well, sort of. We have too little information here to make an intelligent decision, which makes the judge blocking a trial all the more puzzling.
Originally posted by: Aelius
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Aelius
The definition of evil (I happen to agree with):
"A lack of empathy. A genine incapacity to feel with their fellow man. Evil, I think is the absence of empathy." -Nuremberg
Accurate, but incomplete. What's left out is WHY...and most often the answer is that it's not a matter of empathy for your fellow man, it's an inability to see the object of your evil as a person at all. Every bit of evil in history begins with the dehumanization of your opponent, whether from religious, social, racial, whatever reasons, the evildoer paints the target as someone not quite human, and therefore an inappropriate target for compassion.
Why depends on the circumstances but I think some factors are common. I also took this from Nuremberg as it was a more complete answer then what I had and again I agree with it.
-The country has to be one where the people do what they are told. You are brought up as a child not to question authority. You obey your parents, teachers, clergymen, superior officers and the government.
-The nation is bombarded with propaganda to dehumanize whomever the oppenent happens to be.
For German that was whomever was a Jew, Homosexual, Jehovah's Witness', Communist etc.
What we are seeing is a far more effective object. Terrorist. Anyone can be a terrorist regardless of race or creed. If right now today your parents were labeled as terrorists they would likely loose their friends and the only ones likely to belieave them is their own family and a select others.
Thankfully western nations are not an identical template to Nazi Germany and such moves are not 100% effective. If they were there would likely be mass disapearances and renditions.
Hopefully with us constantly questioning and educating others we can prevent it from ever taking the exact same form as Nazi Germany eventually became.
Sadly we are far closer to crossing that line then I ever care to imagine. It's an increadible shame considering what not just as nations but as Humanity itself have fought so hard against and gave up so much to try to wipe out.
Originally posted by: zendari
Repost.
The actions of the Bush administration are quite proper; hence, this judge came to his conclusion.
Gotta love the liberals though. They whine about stuff being illegal, then when the judges who decide whether stuff is legal or illegal find it to be legal, they whine about the judge too.
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: zendari
Repost.
The actions of the Bush administration are quite proper; hence, this judge came to his conclusion.
Gotta love the liberals though. They whine about stuff being illegal, then when the judges who decide whether stuff is legal or illegal find it to be legal, they whine about the judge too.
I hope they pick you up, spirit you off to a secret CIA prison, beat and sodomize you, and then you can tell us all how "quite proper" the actions of the bush administration are.
If they can do this to one person, they can do it to anyone.
This, America, is what we now stand for. We should all be so very proud.
Originally posted by: zendari
In our nation where people are typically innocent until proven otherwise its up to the liberals to make their case.
So there's no doubt the CIA violated this guy's rights and as a violation of the Geneva Convention . . . violated US law. When did the judicial branch of government become the defender of "state secrets", violations of international treaties, and total disregard of basic human rights?Yet while keeping the case low-profile is considered vital, some steps at resolution have been made. German Interior Minister Otto Schily, the only German minister who was a loyal friend to the US even during the Iraq war, headed to Washington recently to visit with CIA director Porter Goss. One of the points on Schily's agenda was likely an attempt to explore whether another "el-Masrigate" can be avoided in the future. Berlin wants assurance that this was a one-time lapse. At the request of the Justice Ministry, the Foreign Ministry, and the Chancellory, the German intelligence services had done their homework before Schily's visit. Sure enough, the Americans quietly admitted to kidnapping el-Masri and vaguely implied how the whole matter had somehow gotten out of hand.
that definitely sounds like the Bush Regime.In a city that el-Masri believes was Kabul, several masked men with American accents beat him, he claims. Tied up with handcuffs and foot shackles, a man of Lebanese descent relayed the cold, hard truth to him: "You are in a country where the laws don't apply to you."
I hope this guy wins an ICC case against Bush, Rumsfeld, Goss, and Tenet.But even without that help, the German investigators have made some progress. Because el-Masri claimed that he felt a trembler during his imprisonment, they checked for earthquakes in the Hindukush last year. Sure enough, the seismographs detected several quakes between Kabul and Kandahar, and that, in turn, corresponds with the preliminary result from the isotope analysis. It provides important information indicating that el-Masri was, in fact, in the region at the time. "That's a key part of the puzzle," say investigators.
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Democrats are terrorists in the eyes of Republicans, this kind of happening is justified or plain funny. I encourage you to read their OT posts. Chilling.