Lynn Cheneys Dirty Dick is cought in a vice, and we can impeach him. We have all heard a chorus of "Impeach Bush" lately, but I never hear "and Dick Cheney too!". Normally it would be a great idea to throw out a mentally challenged appointed president who is manipulated by neo-Nazi Straussian chickenhawks, however, it is not a good idea, when what you will get, will be the dirty neo-Nazi Straussian Chickenhawks figurehead, mainly "Dirty Dick" Cheney.
Below I lay out my argument in cutting the 'get Bush' proposition at the moment, and focus on getting his Dirty Dick in order defend our Republic from a Fascist and Imperial philosophical roots of the Straussians.
Point 1 (Dirty lies only a Dirty Dick would try): Dirty Dick is completely exposed on lying to Congress, manipulating and lying to the President, The American People, and the UN (I know, all of a sudden it's popular not to like the dirty 'UN'). To support these claims, I ask you all to look at this paper, which cuts right to the chase in a report, and a chronological order of Dirty Dick Cheney?s lies:
LaRouche Says Charges Against Cheney Constitute Grounds for Impeachment
Waxman (Head of the oversight committee) took up this opportunity after getting the material from the LaRouche movement, and wrote the White House a letter of his own, in which we also got the reply to all on the front page of: www.larouchepub.com[/L] In Brief, ...wsj_attack_lar.html"] EIR report on the story and Lyndon LaRouches reply to Barleys column .
The Chickenhawk/wallstreet Straussian financial establishment is freaking out over the influence and what they have done is too little, and too late. The chickenhawks are surrounded and ready to lay a big egg, possibly a 'dirty bomb' egg to get their rule by decree. Since they are exposed, we can move to actually impeach them, not make nice sounding rhythms and chants in protests.
Point 4 (Does Bush have the balls to reign in Sharon): George Bush realizes now that in order to get re-elected, he has to have peace in the middle east, and stand by his statement on a 'Palestinian State in 2005'. Bush might have thought he could work with Sharon, but he realizes that now, he has a problem. A good paper to read would be the Ha'aretz paper "Bush has a problem with Sharon" in which a small transcript of their meeting with Bush, Sharon, and Abu Mazen shows the inner conflict. In order for Bush to keep the Bulldog (or Bulldozer) Sharon under leash, he has to get rid of Sharon?s biggest supporters, specifically, the Jabotinsky-ite Zionist chickenhawks in Dick Cheney?s office and cabinet (lately, you would expect to find some of them even hiding in the closet). These people are the biggest backers of Sharon, and if there is enough movement to get rid of Sharon, you get something worse, a Yahoo named Netanyahu; whose father was a personal secretary of Vladamir Jabotinsky (Whom Israelis founder and first Prime Minister, David Ben Gurion called "Vladamir Hitler). Just like in Washington DC, impeach just the elected head official in Israel (Sharon), you will get something worse (Yahoo). In order to stop the 'Clash of Civilizations' in the middle east, we must clear the white house of this fascist coup, through a counter coup already in progress.
Point 5 ( Viagra doesn't work for the Economy :
Rumsfeld, Paul Volker, and Cheney it seems like, are out to destroy the US economy and cause an 'economic 9-11'. We don't mean planes crashing in Wall Street, but instead, a major meltdown. In times of crisis such as this, a major meltdown would greatly help the chickenhawks control the population and destroy civil services, just like Hitler did through Strausses teacher, Carl Schmitt, after the 'Reichstag fire' of 1933. Therefore, this has prompted LaRouche to ask:
LaRouche Calls The Question On Bush Administration Economics Policy Disaster: "Stupidity or Willfulness?"
With these 5 simple points and obvious points, I hope I have conveyed the urgency of not picking at the Scab (Bush), but cleaning the entire cancer (chickenhawks). Therefore, if you wish to fight for the continuity of this Republic and the inalienable rights of all men, help us clear the chickenhawks. It doesn't matter even if you don't like LaRouche, it doesn't mean you can't work with him if he is leading the fight against the Straussian Chickenhawks. Thank You.
LaRouche Leads Democratic Presidential Candidates In Number of Individual Contributions
Who would have ever guessed this would have happened?
[edit]
Had to edit the links so they would work.
Added the Lynn Cheneys Dirty Dick Part...
Below I lay out my argument in cutting the 'get Bush' proposition at the moment, and focus on getting his Dirty Dick in order defend our Republic from a Fascist and Imperial philosophical roots of the Straussians.
Point 1 (Dirty lies only a Dirty Dick would try): Dirty Dick is completely exposed on lying to Congress, manipulating and lying to the President, The American People, and the UN (I know, all of a sudden it's popular not to like the dirty 'UN'). To support these claims, I ask you all to look at this paper, which cuts right to the chase in a report, and a chronological order of Dirty Dick Cheney?s lies:
LaRouche Says Charges Against Cheney Constitute Grounds for Impeachment
Waxman (Head of the oversight committee) took up this opportunity after getting the material from the LaRouche movement, and wrote the White House a letter of his own, in which we also got the reply to all on the front page of: www.larouchepub.com[/L] In Brief, ...wsj_attack_lar.html"] EIR report on the story and Lyndon LaRouches reply to Barleys column .
The Chickenhawk/wallstreet Straussian financial establishment is freaking out over the influence and what they have done is too little, and too late. The chickenhawks are surrounded and ready to lay a big egg, possibly a 'dirty bomb' egg to get their rule by decree. Since they are exposed, we can move to actually impeach them, not make nice sounding rhythms and chants in protests.
Point 4 (Does Bush have the balls to reign in Sharon): George Bush realizes now that in order to get re-elected, he has to have peace in the middle east, and stand by his statement on a 'Palestinian State in 2005'. Bush might have thought he could work with Sharon, but he realizes that now, he has a problem. A good paper to read would be the Ha'aretz paper "Bush has a problem with Sharon" in which a small transcript of their meeting with Bush, Sharon, and Abu Mazen shows the inner conflict. In order for Bush to keep the Bulldog (or Bulldozer) Sharon under leash, he has to get rid of Sharon?s biggest supporters, specifically, the Jabotinsky-ite Zionist chickenhawks in Dick Cheney?s office and cabinet (lately, you would expect to find some of them even hiding in the closet). These people are the biggest backers of Sharon, and if there is enough movement to get rid of Sharon, you get something worse, a Yahoo named Netanyahu; whose father was a personal secretary of Vladamir Jabotinsky (Whom Israelis founder and first Prime Minister, David Ben Gurion called "Vladamir Hitler). Just like in Washington DC, impeach just the elected head official in Israel (Sharon), you will get something worse (Yahoo). In order to stop the 'Clash of Civilizations' in the middle east, we must clear the white house of this fascist coup, through a counter coup already in progress.
Point 5 ( Viagra doesn't work for the Economy :
Rumsfeld, Paul Volker, and Cheney it seems like, are out to destroy the US economy and cause an 'economic 9-11'. We don't mean planes crashing in Wall Street, but instead, a major meltdown. In times of crisis such as this, a major meltdown would greatly help the chickenhawks control the population and destroy civil services, just like Hitler did through Strausses teacher, Carl Schmitt, after the 'Reichstag fire' of 1933. Therefore, this has prompted LaRouche to ask:
LaRouche Calls The Question On Bush Administration Economics Policy Disaster: "Stupidity or Willfulness?"
With these 5 simple points and obvious points, I hope I have conveyed the urgency of not picking at the Scab (Bush), but cleaning the entire cancer (chickenhawks). Therefore, if you wish to fight for the continuity of this Republic and the inalienable rights of all men, help us clear the chickenhawks. It doesn't matter even if you don't like LaRouche, it doesn't mean you can't work with him if he is leading the fight against the Straussian Chickenhawks. Thank You.
LaRouche Leads Democratic Presidential Candidates In Number of Individual Contributions
Who would have ever guessed this would have happened?
[edit]
Had to edit the links so they would work.
Added the Lynn Cheneys Dirty Dick Part...
Facebook
Twitter