Originally posted by: Mermaidman
CRUISE CONTROL DOESN'T HAVE CANCEL BUTTON :| ARRRGH!
Yes, there is a main cruise control on/off switch, but if I hit Off, it takes two steps to re-establish cruise. Whereas with a cancel button, only one step is needed. It sounds trivial, but it ANGERS ME. ANd I don't like to use brakes.Originally posted by: Insane3D
Originally posted by: Mermaidman
CRUISE CONTROL DOESN'T HAVE CANCEL BUTTON :| ARRRGH!
It must. No off button? You can usually disengage any cruise control by hitting the brake, or pushing in the clutch on a MT equipped vehicle...
That reminded me of my very first car....a 76 Camaro with the same annoyancesOriginally posted by: sumdumbum
'02 Camaro:
-due to side window design (no frame around edge, just weathestriping around edge) doesn't seal perfect, so there's a slight wind noise at highway speeds and will occasionally leak water in VERY heavy rain
-car sits low, so all the floor had to be molded to fit all the underbody thigns (exhaust, driveshaft, etc). This means there's a "bump" in the passenger floorboard where the catalic converter is and the driveshaft tunnel is about 8" taller than the floor in the backseat ares
-"backseats" have absolutely no room. I guess for a sports car I can't really complain, especially considering I rarely drive any passengers around
-sits low so most people in their massive SUV's don't look for me/see me - I've nearly been sideswiped by Explorers and larger SUV's more than 3 times (all the times I can think of now)
Asside from these things (which are easy to overlook) I love the car.
Mark VIII. 3,800 pounds but the chassis (same as the late-model Thunderbird) is know for being poor in the snow.Originally posted by: Insane3D
What sort of Lincoln? I've got a modfied fox body Mustang that's well over 300ft/lbs, and I'm fine in these NH winters with a set of Blizzaks. Of course, it's not a FWD or AWD car, but it does amazingly well ever since the Blizzaks went on. I'm guessing your Lincoln is heavier..so it should be better.Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
The Lincoln: It's a sled. It's fast going straight but can barely corner. Also, terrible in the snow, even with Blizzaks. 285 ft/lbs and only 40% of the weight over the drive axle doesn't help.
ZV
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Mark VIII. 3,800 pounds but the chassis (same as the late-model Thunderbird) is know for being poor in the snow.Originally posted by: Insane3D
What sort of Lincoln? I've got a modfied fox body Mustang that's well over 300ft/lbs, and I'm fine in these NH winters with a set of Blizzaks. Of course, it's not a FWD or AWD car, but it does amazingly well ever since the Blizzaks went on. I'm guessing your Lincoln is heavier..so it should be better.Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
The Lincoln: It's a sled. It's fast going straight but can barely corner. Also, terrible in the snow, even with Blizzaks. 285 ft/lbs and only 40% of the weight over the drive axle doesn't help.
ZV
It's not un-manageable, but my 924S (also RWD, but only 2,700 pounds) did better in the snow on 3-season Bridgestones than the Mark did with Blizzaks.
ZV
Originally posted by: theman
got a 1995 bmw 525i. its a pretty nice car, except it has a lot of strange electrical problems. like, the sunroof opens some days, but doesnt open other days. the coolant level light keeps coming on, even though i replaced the sensor. and, once, the gas gauge stopped working for a day. and its rediculous how much these dealers charge. 200 dollars to change the oil? wtf is that?
Originally posted by: TNM93
Instrument gauges don't work right. Sometimes they will go to 140 mph and then go back to 0 on startup. I've taken it to be looked at, and they can't pinpoint the problem. Oh, and it used to stall too. :roll: