We sure do have our share of winners though.Some of the Reps here in New Hampshire sure have class, please don't judge all people from here based on these idiots.
We sure do have our share of winners though.Some of the Reps here in New Hampshire sure have class, please don't judge all people from here based on these idiots.
That's a silly argument. They did not say muskets. Repeating firearms have existed for quite literally hundreds of years before the 2A was authored, and our forefathers that were well versed in military arms still chose the wording they did.
So what? They were all black powder flintlocks.
Exactly what repeating firearms were being produced hundreds of years before the Constitution was written?
Hint: None
Oh, I got it.....the Constitution is currently being written as I type. D'oh!
Here is an example of a repeating firearm from 1597.
https://thornews.com/2014/03/27/the-worlds-oldest-existing-revolver-1597/
You are technically correct, this gun is only ~193 years prior to the 2A, so not technically "hundreds of years." That's the earliest I know of, but there are others that came to existence before the 2A was authored as well.
Exactly what repeating firearms were being produced hundreds of years before the Constitution was written?
Hint: None
Oh, I got it.....the Constitution is currently being written as I type. D'oh!
Exactly what repeating firearms were being produced hundreds of years before the Constitution was written?
Hint: None
Oh, I got it.....the Constitution is currently being written as I type. D'oh!
That is a man with a very small dick.Yes in support of a league that is equivalent of a WOMAN'S NRA!
And who wears a lapel button of an "assault weapon" except for extremist.
View attachment 3952
So what about that though? If you have a gun that can shoot multiple rounds, and those rounds will kill you just as dead as today's guns, the effect is pretty well the same.

 
				
		