Atomic Playboy
Lifer
- Feb 6, 2007
- 16,432
- 1
- 81
Tell that to most of Denver, amongst other places.
What, pray tell, isn't simple about 32F and 212F? What, pray tell, isn't simple about 12" = 1', 3' = 1yd, 1760yds = 1mi? What, pray tell, isn't simple about 16oz. = 1lb? Or 2000lbs = 1 short ton? It's no less simple than metric. Metric is for the arithmetically challenged. If you don't like it, move to Canukistan.
That's so unabashedly pig-ignorant and stupid that it bears repeating. Disclaimer: I'm American, I've been using the American units all my life, and I don't find them complicated. In any discussion of simplicity, metric wins, hands down. It's not even a contest. Not only is the math easier, but you have to remember arbitrary numbers depending on what units you happen to be looking at. 3, 12, 36, 5,280, 1,760, 16, 8, 32, 212, 128... all those numbers have some significance in the American system. 1, 10, 100, 1,000, 10,000, etc... Which is easier? And you have to remember which units are which. That's not a problem if you've grown up with it, but what about someone who needs 8 ounces of flour. Well is that 8 ounces in volume or in weight? Because ounces is both in the American system. And don't get me started on regional measurements, like using "stone" in Britain (14 pounds? How the fuck is that math easy?).
There's no rational reason to oppose the metric system outside of "I don't want to learn something new." Which is fine. It's an excuse borne of laziness, but I'm right there with you on that; I don't want to learn the metric system either. But don't act like the metric system is somehow "inferior." That's just idiotic. You're just lazy, like me, and what we have works well enough to get by.
