Theres apparently far more material

[agent00f]

You may want to post this in reply to those still posting "But she won the popular vote"

After a performance like this it's unclear how anyone can be expected to treat you as more than simple.

 

[JSt0rm]

You may want to post this in reply to those still posting "But she won the popular vote"

you voted for a russian plant.

 

[Londo_Jowo]

you voted for a russian plant.

Really? I didn't know John Kasich had Russian ties

 

[Perknose]

lol trump will get impeached and pence will be president. Still good for the republicans. I dont even know pence but Id take him over trump.

Pence? Get to know him and you'll change your mind. Trust me on this.

 

[Perknose]

Really? Let's say the report is revealed to be 100% fake, and our intelligence agencies (which Trump has a vendetta against) admit to taking it seriously, and CNN (which Trump has a vendetta against) admits to jumping the gun. You don't think that validates everything Trump has been accusing others of over the last several months?

You don't seem to have the first clue about how intelligence discovery works. There was ENOUGH there for them to "take it seriously" enough to look into, that's all. North of 90% of incoming intel deemed substantial enough to look into shakes out as not particularly valid in the end.That's what makes intel discovery so damn difficult, sifting the wheat from the chafe. This little "tidbit" is in that 90%.

This only validates Trump's whole cloth lies if you or the many low info idiots out there want to believe it will.

So my direct question to you is, "Do you want to believe it will?"

 

[NesuD]

Well, Trump is a close friend of ol' Epstein. Do people genuinely think Trump isn't a rapacious degenerate?

Even if he is I'm just trying to figure out what it has to do with his presidency. Country pretty much decided that stuff didn't matter 3 administrations ago.

 

[Thebobo]

Pence? Get to know him and you'll change your mind. Trust me on this.

Yea Pence is a true born again, the man believes the world is only 6000 years old.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

You may want to post this in reply to those still posting "But she won the popular vote"

she did. unfortunately the electoral vote matters more.
get over it

 

[senseamp]

What if the hookers were underaged? Then it's a crime, under the US law, even if it happened in Russia.

 

[Londo_Jowo]

she did. unfortunately the electoral vote matters more.
get over it

LMAO!!! What's there for me to get over. Maybe you talk to the one's making all the excuses why she lost

 

[ElFenix]

Don't we already have a thread on this?

 

[First]

Nah, a lot of people are watching those also.

You mean things like this, also ?

Republicans pass sweeping bill to reform 'abusive' U.S. regulation

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-congress-regulations-idUSKBN14W02N

Right there in the article dude:

Still, none of these bills may become law, as Democrats hold enough seats in the Senate to filibuster.

Derp.

 

[KMFJD]

http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity...-putin-relationship-in-2013-interview-w460547

"I do a have relationship," the real estate mogul, now 70, replied. "And I can tell you that he's very interested in what we're doing here today. He's probably very interested in what you and I am saying today, and I'm sure he's going to be seeing it in some form. But I do have a relationship with him."

so does he or doesn't he....

 

[feralkid]

Naw, it still makes me laugh

You don't uh...you don't get humor, do you?

 

[cytg111]

http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity...-putin-relationship-in-2013-interview-w460547

"I do a have relationship," the real estate mogul, now 70, replied. "And I can tell you that he's very interested in what we're doing here today. He's probably very interested in what you and I am saying today, and I'm sure he's going to be seeing it in some form. But I do have a relationship with him."

so does he or doesn't he....

2013 is within the alleged 5 year "grooming" period too.

 

[Londo_Jowo]

You don't uh...you don't get humor, do you?

I get humor just fine. The forum has been quite humorous since 11/9.

 

[Londo_Jowo]

After a performance like this it's unclear how anyone can be expected to treat you as more than simple.

Have you notice the vast majority of this forum ignores your posts. Much of the left in here feel you're a plant to make their side look bad.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Have you notice the vast majority of this forum ignores your posts. Much of the left in here feel you're a plant to make their side look bad.

wow, thanks for speaking for us silent folk on the left. good thing there are so many here making the right look like complete morons

 

[Londo_Jowo]

wow, thanks for speaking for us silent folk on the left. good thing there are so many here making the right look like complete morons

There are plenty on the right. However, I was repeating some of the posts I've seen from those on the left

 

[cytg111]

This is golden

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVYEuqr0hAI
https://youtu.be/VigvdWezawI?t=94
https://youtu.be/VigvdWezawI?t=132
https://youtu.be/VigvdWezawI?t=286

and here is the real kicker, even if this turns out to be false :

https://youtu.be/VigvdWezawI?t=403

Live by the sword die by the sword. So true. Very fair!

 

[HamburgerBoy]

You don't seem to have the first clue about how intelligence discovery works. There was ENOUGH there for them to "take it seriously" enough to look into, that's all. North of 90% of incoming intel deemed substantial enough to look into shakes out as not particularly valid in the end.That's what makes intel discovery so damn difficult, sifting the wheat from the chafe. This little "tidbit" is in that 90%.

This only validates Trump's whole cloth lies if you or the many low info idiots out there want to believe it will.

So my direct question to you is, "Do you want to believe it will?"

How many Americans do you think know in great detail how intelligence agencies work? The point is perception.

Since this document has been floated around to many both in politics and news over the last few months, and since there are still a lot of contradictory stories about it coming out, I don't know how this bodes for intelligence. Is it normal for the 90% to be presented to the President/President elect, assuming that has happened at all (story varies there right now)? For terrorist/national security threats I could imagine a lot would be just because of the risk of overlooking an unverified-but-true report, so if that's procedure then it would be hard to fault them. Does the ex-MI6 guy have a rock solid history or has he gone a bit crazy in recent years? That could change things. Did intelligence show the documents to people like Harry Reid or John McCain, leading to the reports in the news just prior to election day? That would make them look as bad as the reporting on Wiener's emails.

Whichever way it pans out, I'm excited. If the results take people down, whether Trump or the media or the CIA or all three, I'll be happy.

 

[Victorian Gray]

Regarding the credibility of the ex-MI6 guy, some info from The Guardian:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...redibility-donald-trump-russia-dossier-author

 

[rudder]

you voted for a russian plant.

Remind me which 2016 presidential candidate sold 20% of U.S. Uranium production to a Russian company.

 

[outriding]

Remind me which 2016 presidential candidate sold 20% of U.S. Uranium production to a Russian company.

Ohh. This one?

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

 

[Meghan54]

Remind me which 2016 presidential candidate sold 20% of U.S. Uranium production to a Russian company.

As was mentioned above....none. BTW...you do understand no matter who owns that mine, the uranium that comes out of it cannot leave U.S. shores. It's law, at least until Jan. 20th.