dank69
Lifer
Bober... where are you? Not like you to hit and run is it?
Of course it is, haha.
Bober... where are you? Not like you to hit and run is it?
So pretty much you can't face the truth that women can't learn certain topics or do certain tasks as well and thus the only way around that is to lower standards.LOL. No... I acknowledge your limitations for comprehension and am left with derision as a tempting option.
LOL. No... I acknowledge your limitations for comprehension and am left with derision as a tempting option.
Of course they don't. High minded ideals fall by the wayside when people don't tow the party line.Hey, Steinem told us they just want to find the "boys" and they're in Bernie's camp. Apparently people like her don't see any problem and the obvious sexism in the implication that women voters are driven by nothing but looking for boys and are incapable of making solid political decisions.
Women in IT. Not because men don't want them there, but because maths is hard.I think you will find over time that an overwhelmingly affluent, white, male message board doesn't exactly have an objective look at poor, minority, or women's issues.
In fact I'm not aware of a single woman that posts to this board regularly. There might be one here or there, but they are very rare.
So pretty much you can't face the truth that women can't learn certain topics or do certain tasks as well and thus the only way around that is to lower standards.
Not so surprisingly, one of the areas women have constantly fallen behind in is logic. It is why they find math difficult. Why programming has to be dumbed down. This is also where you fail. No so surprisingly.
Because, you know, feelings.
Yeah. That's it.Well, first of all, I disagree with your claim that standards have been lowered to accommodate women. It's a fallacious argument. You like to generalize women in ways that just aren't true. You'll have to show me how "programming has been dumbed down." Are computers now dumber? As a woman who knows how to "program" and pretty damn good in math, the women I know (and have known) are very intelligent and often more focused than males.
People aren't being taught less to accommodate women. Changes have been argued for (and won) to encourage girls that it's okay to speak up in class, rather than reinforcing the notion that boys are more valuable than girls.
But, like I said earlier, you bitch because you no longer get to stack the deck before we "play cards." I'm sorry you feel so put upon.
You claim "towing the party line," then in the same breath are praising the words one of your "party pals" put into the words of Gloria Steinem. See, in school... you know, where girls are dumb, we learned that is called "hypocrisy."Of course they don't. High minded ideals fall by the wayside when people don't tow the party line.
You certainly seem threatened by women in the workplace. Did a woman take a job from you and the only way you can square that is that she cheated?It is why they rabidly attack stay at home moms. Women can't have a choice to stay at home, they have to work to tear down men. Every job a woman gives up by staying at home is a job that evil man takes.
Personal choice? Maternal instinct? Doing what's best for your children?
Fuck that. Waste money on child care! No personal choice! Let others raise your kids and tell them that the only way to succeed is to bow to women and subjugate men! Fuck what is best for your kids, let the government raise them to be good little socialist sjws!
Women in IT. Not because men don't want them there, but because maths is hard.
It's why we need to get rid of math in it. Just dumb it down to sight words and wysiwyg editors. Fuck logical phonics where both genders do better.
Women in IT. Not because men don't want them there, but because maths is hard.
It's why we need to get rid of math in it. Just dumb it down to sight words and wysiwyg editors. Fuck logical phonics where both genders do better.
LOL... so women are the reason for wysiwyg?
Ever hear of progress? Products improve constantly under a free market system. Ease of use is generally seen as profit producing. But not by you. You see it as a feminist take-over conspiracy. Put down the foil hat and call a professional.
If anything I say a lot to support women. Just not what feminists like to hear.I'm not going to get into this nonsense with you, let's just say if you want I can go dig up loads and loads of insanely ignorant and incredibly bigoted statements you've made against women in the past. You're almost totally irrational on the issue.
I hope you can see the irony in complaining about people being illogical after you've said things like 'the purpose of feminism is the emasculation of men'. You're just a loony.
If anything I say a lot to support women. Just not what feminists like to hear.
My wife is just as smart as I am. She did very well in her career. I would like her to go back to work once kids are in school but if she wants to stay home and enjoy life that's okay too.
If anything I say a lot to support women. Just not what feminists like to hear.
My wife is just as smart as I am. She did very well in her career. I would like her to go back to work once kids are in school but if she wants to stay home and enjoy life that's okay too.
I am perfectly fine with it. From an early age I have raised her to be extremely independent and pushed her to be quantitatively focused, constantly counting everything. I also make her do the same chores as my oldest son and teach her consequence. I put up with no fake crying from her since it is just psychological manipulation.That's nice to hear. If you have a daughter, how would you feel about her watching what you're saying here? Would it make you proud? I'm sure she already knows your position more or less.
I am perfectly fine with it. From an early age I have raised her to be extremely independent and pushed her to be quantitatively focused, constantly counting everything. I also make her do the same chores as my oldest son and teach her consequence. I put up with no fake crying from her since it is just psychological manipulation.
No, it is very realist of me. I don't make it easy on her. I teach her phonetically.That's very feminist of you. On those points, I think you're doing marvelous. Kudos.
No, it is very realist of me. I don't make it easy on her. I teach her phonetically.
I don't lower the bar and I don't give her special treatment over my son's.
pre-edit:
No, it is very realist of me. I don't make it easy on her. Nor do I let her know that she doesn't need a man and will likely encourage her to get married in her twenties and have kids sooner rather than later. She has a nice pink room and wears lots of dresses and I enforce gender roles every day.
That isn't feminism.
Lol, ok there sparky.Yes, that is feminism.
Lol, ok there sparky.
Feminists teach women that the only way to do better is to make boys do worse.
Hence phonics vs sight words.
Being an idiot and voting democrat are not the same thing. You realize this, yes?You mean special places in hell like all those places where people have been voting Democrat for decades and they're still poor?
:thumbsup:I am perfectly fine with it. From an early age I have raised her to be extremely independent and pushed her to be quantitatively focused, constantly counting everything. I also make her do the same chores as my oldest son and teach her consequence. I put up with no fake crying from her since it is just psychological manipulation.