I thought everything else was rhetorical.
No, we dont want to adjust things to incorrect expectations.
As for the 2nd sentence, I don't understand what you mean I think. Desire may not come from consensus, but you can have a consensus in desires.
You can have a consensus in desires only if you have made the mistake of suggesting that the desire of one person comes into valid being only by the consent of another. Desires exist. They do not come into being by consent. Many of them we might wish we didn't have but they stay anyway. To offer sexual consent between two people is to offer consent to the act. This is why it is called sexual consent and not desire consent. So this consensus in desires that you speak of is only there because you are unwilling to admit you are wrong and no such wording makes any other real sense.
By the way, the fact that you are utterly completely and imbecilicly wrong about this, which makes you cravenly incapable of being actually honest doesn't bother me in the slights. I am not here to best you in logic or an any other way, but to show you how you get lost in the mundane modality of your thinking process and how you manage to irritate the shit out of people.
Last edited: