• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

There's a special place in hell for people who vote Democrat

Page 17 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I thought everything else was rhetorical.

No, we dont want to adjust things to incorrect expectations.

As for the 2nd sentence, I don't understand what you mean I think. Desire may not come from consensus, but you can have a consensus in desires.

You can have a consensus in desires only if you have made the mistake of suggesting that the desire of one person comes into valid being only by the consent of another. Desires exist. They do not come into being by consent. Many of them we might wish we didn't have but they stay anyway. To offer sexual consent between two people is to offer consent to the act. This is why it is called sexual consent and not desire consent. So this consensus in desires that you speak of is only there because you are unwilling to admit you are wrong and no such wording makes any other real sense.

By the way, the fact that you are utterly completely and imbecilicly wrong about this, which makes you cravenly incapable of being actually honest doesn't bother me in the slights. I am not here to best you in logic or an any other way, but to show you how you get lost in the mundane modality of your thinking process and how you manage to irritate the shit out of people.
 
Last edited:
Where's the honest conversation? You responded to the least important part of my post. You never answered that desire also a part of reality, can't exist out of consensus, but you happily dove in the cesspool with bshole.


For shame, RealiBrad. I always thought you were better than that. Now I know you are just as twisted and disgusting as me. Wanna do a wife swap?
 
Ah hell ya! Imma all in baby.

Your all in just reminded me of a joke.

So, the context of how I first heard this is important to the joke. This new guy had just started at my company. He was a brother of a friend of my boss. My boss was super uptight and when this guy started, he was super quite. He seemed super serious just like my boss. So, me and another guy are sitting in the room with the new guy just working away. The new guy out of nowhere sits back, and looks over at us and says...

"So she said she wanted 2 more inches, so I put in in twice"

As you can imagine we fucking lost it. Solid joke.
 
Your all in just reminded me of a joke.

So, the context of how I first heard this is important to the joke. This new guy had just started at my company. He was a brother of a friend of my boss. My boss was super uptight and when this guy started, he was super quite. He seemed super serious just like my boss. So, me and another guy are sitting in the room with the new guy just working away. The new guy out of nowhere sits back, and looks over at us and says...

"So she said she wanted 2 more inches, so I put in in twice"

As you can imagine we fucking lost it. Solid joke.

LoL! That's great! When my wife says she wants 2 more feet, I put it in twice.
 
Those right wing bible thumpers are at it again, telling people they're going to go to hell if they vote for a Democrat.

Oops, wait, I got that wrong. Only people that vote for Bernie Sanders are going to hell. Must be Fox News spinning the story again.

Wait, no, I got that wrong too. Apparently now Democrats are condemning each other to hell for not voting for the "correct" candidate.

http://www.commondreams.org/news/20...pecial-place-hell-women-who-dont-vote-clinton

This election cycle is amazing. Hollywood couldn't have written a better comedy.

based on this it appears you get a lot of things wrong....how bout this? What will happen to HC when the FBI release the rest of the emails? would really like to hear your thoughts on that....is she above the LAW?????
 
based on this it appears you get a lot of things wrong....how bout this? What will happen to HC when the FBI release the rest of the emails? would really like to hear your thoughts on that....is she above the LAW?????

I tried really hard to figure out why you posted your comment. He linked an article that fully fits his post. What he claimed was said was actually said.

Then you come in with emails?
 
based on this it appears you get a lot of things wrong....how bout this? What will happen to HC when the FBI release the rest of the emails? would really like to hear your thoughts on that....is she above the LAW?????

I'd venture a guess that your IQ is somewhere around 70...
 
I'd venture a guess that your IQ is somewhere around 70...

I'd venture a guess you need some new lines.

Your insults are getting repetitive. Just an observation from over time.

Not that I really didn't disagree with what you said earlier, but you're just in ranting insult mode again.
 
Last edited:
I'd venture a guess you need some new lines.

Your insults are getting repetitive. Just an observation from over time.

Unfortunately we all get repetitive. I often get bored with myself because of my own repetitiveness. It is damn near impossible for a simple human to not be repetitive. When was the last time something truly original or new was posted on this forum (if ever).
 
Unfortunately we all get repetitive. I often get bored with myself because of my own repetitiveness. It is damn near impossible for a simple human to not be repetitive. When was the last time something truly original or new was posted on this forum (if ever).

The fact that it's the insults are repetitive, is probably more the point I was pretty much trying to make.

I suppose.
 
Back
Top