RTX? DLSS 3? To play Witcher 3?The Witcher 3 is even nicer to play with RTX on too. Now that I got frame generation working without crashing, it looks really good.
DLSS 3 is there to boost framerates and yea I agree that now games are just put together with the most expensive options so they can sell the latest cards which those technologies are locked into.RTX? DLSS 3? To play Witcher 3?
Being serious; Linus' employees that were part of the challenge, either couldn't tell DLSS 3 was being used, or preferred it. Hence, this will be another feature where some love it, some hate it.
My own hot take is that needing to use it with expensive GPUs is hot garbage. FSR, XeSS, DLSS, and other implementations should be there for old cards to extend their useful lives. Which of course comes at the expense of some visual fidelity. That a $800 and higher card is being used with these technologies sucks. Makes me want to put on the tinfoil hat, as it seems like they are making these games run like ass, to force these features on users. Features that separate those cards from others, even within their own product stack.
@GodisanAtheist
I played with hairworks on. I figured since it was running flawlessly, even when I was playing on a setup with 4k max, why no use it?
I can easily tell the difference when DLSS is on with my display. I prefer native 4K over DLSS upscaling.DLSS 3 is there to boost framerates and yea I agree that now games are just put together with the most expensive options so they can sell the latest cards which those technologies are locked into.
Without dlss3 it still looks the same with dlss to me. Without dlss I can get 60fps at 4k but it dips in busy areas it still is playable with all rtx options on if you have a 4090.
Odd because they said Witcher 3 would be the last game. Who said there would be Witcher 4?