The US messed up AGAIN....

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Alistar7

Lifer
May 13, 2002
11,978
0
0
Originally posted by: prontospyder
Originally posted by: Jmman
Even better news. Some Iraqi Clerics have issued FATWAHS, or religoius declarations, supporting a US Coalition VICTORY......:)


They were probably impressed that the sacred shrine in Karbala was not destroyed and that the US colonel paid his respects to the local cleric there.

Freedom of religion and respect for the right to a dissenting opinion? Wow, they sound more like US citizens than Iraqi, at least they get to enjoy this new found way of life for them
 

exp

Platinum Member
May 9, 2001
2,150
0
0
Some Iraqi Clerics have issued FATWAHS, or religoius declarations, supporting a US Coalition VICTORY.
That's nice to see, but after Saddam is gone those very same clerics will undoubtedly issue fatwahs against the U.S. "occupiers". Ya gotta love those religious fundies...

 

Morph

Banned
Oct 14, 1999
747
0
0
Originally posted by: Jmman
Even better news. Some Iraqi Clerics have issued FATWAHS, or religoius declarations, supporting a US Coalition VICTORY......:)

Yep, I wonder how they were payed off. Money? Promises of power in the new government?
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Morph
Originally posted by: Jmman
Even better news. Some Iraqi Clerics have issued FATWAHS, or religoius declarations, supporting a US Coalition VICTORY......:)

Yep, I wonder how they were payed off. Money? Promises of power in the new government?

And just how is a Colonel going to make promises like that?
rolleye.gif
 

tweakmm

Lifer
May 28, 2001
18,436
4
0
Originally posted by: Alistar7

we had a great relationship with the Shah, was it our fault there was a revolt and the Islamic Republic was formed? Yeah, cheer the creation of modern terrorism...
We had a great relationship with the Shah because we took the rightful leader out of power and put the Shah to secure oil in the middle east(I am not implying that is what we are doing now)
The revolt was because the people of the land weren't too happy with our puppet government.

If you were being sarcastic then I apologize :)
If you weren't then I'm sorry;)
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,768
6,336
126
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: Jmman
Even better news. Some Iraqi Clerics have issued FATWAHS, or religoius declarations, supporting a US Coalition VICTORY......:)

I must admit that it's rather odd to see the word "ayatollah" used in a positive context. Those of us who were around in 1979 came to relalize that the Ayatollah Khomeini was the personification of evil, the Bin Laden of his time, as it were.

The Ayatollah was no worse than the Shah, if you were an Iranian. About the only difference between the 2 were which Iranians were more repressed. Strangely enough, after 20 years Iran has evolved to become relatively free and increasingly Democratic, that's without the revolution. Would the Shah have accomplished this?
 

swifty3

Banned
Nov 24, 2001
392
0
0
Originally posted by: Alistar7
The US had felt there would be a FIERCE battle for Karbala considering it's only 50 miles from Baghdad, however the town fell with little resistance and they drove down main street with thousands of Iraqi citizens cheering and welcoming them....................:D

More and more the Iraqi people are warming up to our presence, especially when their saefty is guranteed. We have to include a HUGE thank you to Saddam, for being such a horrible leader, you made our job very easy. The atrocities you have committed in the last two weeks will be the last reminder to your people about how much better off they are without you.

Don't count your chickens before they hatch. There is still plenty of time for US soldiers to get slaughtered in the streets of Bagdad.